Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rhizomania

Abstract

The use of beets as a sugar-producing crop is rather recent, dating to a little over two centuries ago. However, domestication of beets dates back to prehistoric times. The history of the crop is summarized and represents an outstanding example of agricultural accomplishment. Sugar beet is subjected to a number of biotic and abiotic factors that more or less severely limit both sugar yield and processing quality. As it is for industrial purposes with specific requirements, sugar beet cultivation has been always more difficult than other crops. It is believed that agricultural innovation was introduced to accommodate cropping systems (e.g., crop rotation, row cropping) and technology to improve the sucrose production and its extraction (e.g., progeny testing). Among the diseases affecting the crop, rhizomania is certainly the most dangerous. Currently, the cropping of sugar beet would be difficult without the availability of some source of rhizomania resistance. The economic damage caused by rhizomania and its rapid spread across the world are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achard FC (1803) Anleitung zum Anbau der zur Zuckerfabrication anwendbaren Runkelrüben und zur vortheilhaften Gewinnung des Zuckers aus denselben. Reprinted in: Ostwald’s Klassiker der exacten Wissenschaft (1907) Engelmann, Lipsia Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher MJC (1993) Rhizomania. in: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop: Science into practice. Chapmann & Hall, London, UK pp 311–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Alghisi P, D’Ambra V (1966) Ricerche sulla rizomania della bietola. Riv Patol Veg 2:3–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud JF, Fenart S, Gode C, Deledicque S, Touzet P, Cuguen J (2009) Fine‐scale geographical structure of genetic diversity in inland wild beet populations. Mol Ecol 18:3201–3215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D (2010) Gene flow in sugar beet. Sugar Tech 12:201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Brand U (1998) Saline soil condition decreases rhizomania infection of Beta vulgaris. J Plant Pathol 80:219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Schuphan I (2002) Lessons we can learn from ecological biosafety research. J Biotechnol 98:71–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch D, Lehnen M, Clegg J, Pohl‐Orf M, Schuphan I, Ellstrand NC (1999) Impact of gene flow from cultivated beet on genetic diversity of wild sea beet populations. Mol Ecol 8:1733–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, De Biaggi M (eds) (2005) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers, Enfield NH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Biancardi E, Panella LW, Lewellen RT (eds) (2012) Beta maritima: the origin of beets. Springer, Heidelberg Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn F (ed) (1984) Sugar-cane. Longman, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongiovanni GC (1965) Prove di lotta a pieno campo con un fumigante clorurato contro la rizomania della bietola. Notiziario Malattie Piante 72:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bor M, Özdemir F (2003) The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation and antioxidants in leaves of sugar beet Beta vulgaris L. and wild beet Beta maritima L. Plant Sci 164:77–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Büttner G, Mangold B (1998) Tolerance, resistance, immunity. Terms and their significance with reference to rhizomania. Zuckerindustrie 123:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell LG, Klotz KL, Smith LJ (2008) Postharvest storage losses associated with rhizomania in sugar beet. Plant Dis 92:575–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark MF, Adam AN (1977) Characteristics of microplate method of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J Gen Virol 34:475–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke DD (1986) Tolerance of parasites and disease in plants and its significance in host-parasite interactions. Adv Plant Pathol 5:161–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke N, Hetschkun H, Jones C, Boswell E, Marfaing H (1993) Identification of stress tolerance traits in sugar beet. In: Interacting stresses on plants in a changing climate, vol 16. Springer, Heidelberg Germany, pp 511–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (1994) Potential ecological and evolutionary problems of introducing transgenic crops into the environment. In: Krattiger AF, Rosemarin A (eds) Biosafety for sustainable agriculture: sharing biotechnology regulatory experiences of the western hemisphere. SEI, Stockholm Sweden, pp 33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Coons GH, Owen FV, Steward D (1955) Improvement of sugar beet in the United States. Adv Agron 7:89–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambra V, Mutto S (1975) Ultrastruttura di Polymyxa betae Keskin. Plasmodio, sporangio e cistosoro. Riv Patol Veg 11:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • De Biaggi M (1987) Methodes de selection – Un cas concret. Proc IIRB 50:157–161

    Google Scholar 

  • De Biaggi M, Giunchedi L, Poggi-Pollini C, Dradi D (1986) Use of the ELISA technique to assess tolerance to the rhizomania virus in beet genotypes grown in the greenhouse. Sementi Elette 32:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vilmorin L (1856) Note sur la création d’une nouvelle race de betteraves a sucre - Considérations sur l’hérédité dans les végétaux. C R Acad Sci, France, 43:113

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vilmorin JL (ed) (1923) L’Hérédité de la betterave cultivée. Gauthier-Villard, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Doney D, Whitney E (1990) Genetic enhancement in Beta for disease resistance using wild relatives: a strong case for the value of genetic conservation. Econ Bot 44:445–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol 24:17–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7043–7050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer HE (1989) Origin of the ‘Weisse Schlesische Rübe’ (White Silesian Beet) and resynthesis of sugar beet. Euphytica 41:75–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV (2005) Sources of genetic variation in Genus Beta. In: Biancardi E, Campbell LG, Skaracis GN, De Biaggi M (eds) Genetics and breeding of sugar beet. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Lloyd BV, Williams ALS, Williams JT (1975) A revision of Beta section Vulgares (Chenopodiaceae) with new light on the origin of cultivated beets. Bot J Linn Soc 71:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis SA, Luterbacher MC (2003) Identification and exploitation of novel disease resistance genes in sugar beet. Pest Manag Sci 59:225–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RSS (1990) The genetics of resistance to plant viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2:179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese L (2004) Rationale for in situ management of wild Beta species. Crop Wild Relat 2:4–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentili P, Poggi G (1986) Ritmo: esperienze italiane contro rizomania e cercospora. Tecn Bull, Maribo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepts P, Papa R (2003) Possible effects of (trans) gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives. Environ Biosafety Res 2:89–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giunchedi L, Poggi-Pollini C, De Biaggi M (1985) Evaluation of ELISA technique for the screening of rhizomania-tolerant sugar beet genotypes. Proc IIRB 48:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunchedi L, De Biaggi M, Poggi-Pollini C (1987) Correlation between tolerance and beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Phytopathol Mediterr 26:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf A (1984) Studie über das Verhalten von toleranten und anfӓlligen Zuckerrübensorten auf standhorten mit und ohne Rhizomania Befall. Jahrbuch Bundesanstalt Pflanzenbau, Vienna Austria, pp 143–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf A (1987) Was kann in Zukunft von Rizomania toleranten Sorten erwarted werden? Zuckerindustrie 112:405–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Harveson RM, Rush CM (2002) The influence of irrigation frequency and cultivar blends on the severity of multiple root disease in sugar beet. Plant Dis 86:901–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, Van Dijk H (2001) Investment in survival and reproduction along a semelparity–iteroparity gradient in the Beta species complex. J Evolut Biol 14:795–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker RJ, Ruppel EG (1975) Inheritance of resistance to Rhizoctonia root rot in sugar beet. Crop Sci 15:487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeester Y, Tuitert G (1989) Development of rhizomania in an artificially infested field mededeling. Instituut Rationele Suikerproductie 21:469–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann S, Kadereit JW, Kadereit G (2006) Understanding Mediterranean-Californian disjunctions: molecular evidence from Chenopodiaceae-Betoideae. Taxon 55:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen R, Stibbe C (2007) Impact of plant breeding on the profitability of sugar beet production. Int Sugar J 109:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe TH (1990) Genetical studies in relation to breeding objectives in sugar beet. Doctoral dissertation, University of East Anglia, Norwich UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadereit G, Hohmann S, Kadereit JW (2006) A synopsis of Chenopodiaceae subfam Betoideae and notes on the taxonomy of Beta. Willdenowia 36:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyro HW (2000) Effect of high NaCl-salinity on plant growth leaf morphology and ion composition in leaf tissues of Beta vulgaris ssp maritima. J Appl Bot 74:67–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koyro HW, Huchzermeyer B (1999) Influence of high NaCl salinity on growth water and osmotic relations of the halophyte Beta vulgaris ssp maritima. Development of the quick check. In: Liethe Moschenko M, Lohmann M, Koyro HW, Hamdy A (eds) Progress in biometeorology; halophyte uses in different climates, vol 1. Bakchuys Publishers, Leiden The Netherlands, pp 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange W, Brandenburg WA, De Bock TSM (1999) Taxonomy and cultonomy of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Bot J Linn Soc 130:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Cochec F, Soreau P, Retailleau JM (1989) Mode d’action des gènes et hétérosis pour le caractère montée à graines dans le croisement de deux lignées fixées de betterave à sucre (Beta vulgaris L.). Agronomie 9:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach LD, Bainer R (1942) Seed treatment of segmented seed. Proc ASSBT 3:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiva-Eriksson N, Pin PA, Kraft T, Dohm JC, Minoche AE, Himmelbauer H, Bülow L (2014) Differential expression patterns of non-symbiotic hemoglobins in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris). Plant Cell Physiol 55:834–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Letschert JPW (1993) Beta section Beta: biogeographical patterns of variation and taxonomy. Dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen RT (1997) Registration of 11 sugarbeet germplasm C79 lines with resistance to rhizomania. Crop Sci 37:1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen RT (2006) Registration of CN12 and CN72 sugar beet germplasm population with resistance to cyst nematode. Crop Sci 46:1414–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen RT, Biancardi E (1990) Breeding and performance of rhizomania resistant sugar beet. Proc IIRB 53:69–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen RT, Schrandt JK (2001) Inheritance of powdery mildew resistance in sugar beet derived from Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima. Plant Dis 85:627–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood T, Rush CM (1999) Evidences of crop protection between beet soil-borne mosaic virus and beet necrotic yellow vein virus in sugar beet. Plant Dis 83:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Märländer B, Hoffmann C, Koch HJ, Ladewig E, Merkes R, Petersen J, Stockfisch N (2003) Environmental situation and yield performance of the sugar beet crop in Germany: heading for sustainable development. J Agron Crop Sci 189:201–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin K, Sauerborn J (eds) (2013) Agroecology. Springer, Heidelberg Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli LA, Filoso S (2008) Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecol Appl 18:885–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jury S, Kell S, Scholten M (2006) Towards a definition of a crop wild relative. Biodivers Conserv 15:2673–2685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott JM, McDonald BA (1993) Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane JS (1971) Variety development. In: Johnson RT (ed) Advances in sugar beet production: principles and practices. The Iowa State University Press, Ames IA, USA, pp 402–435

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane JS, Price C, Owen FV (1948) Strains of sugarbeets extremely resistant to bolting. Proc ASSBT 5:151–153

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrann GRD, Grimmer MK, Mutasa-Göttgens ES, Stevens M (2009) Progress towards the understanding and control of sugar beet rhizomania disease. Mol Plant Pathol 10:129–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JM, Townsend BJ (2015) Sugar beet energy beet and industrial beet. In: Cruz VMV, Dierig DA (eds) Industrial crops handbook of plant breeding, vol 9. Springer Science, New York, USA, pp 81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JM, Saccomani M, Stevanato P, Biancardi E (2007) Beet. In: Kole C (ed) Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants, vol 5, Vegetables. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 191–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Munerati O (1946) Il problema della barbabietola. Consulta Regionale Veneta dell’ Agicoltura e delle Foreste. Stamperia Editrice Zanetti, Venice Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy AM (1946) Sugar beet and curly top history in Southern Idaho, 1912–1945. Proc ASSBT 4:408–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Luterbacher MC (2002) Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. Ann Bot 89:917–924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Rajabi A (2010) Abiotic stress in sugar beet. Sugar Tech 12:294–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ober ES, Le Bloa M, Royal A, Jaggard KW, Pidgeon JD (2005) Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crop Res 91:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1942) Male sterility in sugar beet produced by complementary effects of cytoplasmic and mendelian inheritance. Am J Bot 29:69

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen FV (1945) Cytoplasmically inherited male-sterility in sugar beets. J Agric Res 71:423–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Panella LW, Kaffka SR, Lewellen RT, McGrath M, Metzger MS, Strausbaugh CA (2014) Sugarbeet. In: Smith S, Diers B, Specht J, Carver B (eds) Yield gains in major US field crops. ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp 245–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltier C, Hleibieh K, Thiel H, Klein E, Bragard C, Gilmer D (2008) Molecular biology of the beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Plant Viruses 2:14–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen LJ, Trnka M, Olesen JE, Calanca P, Eckersten H, Eitzinger J, Gobin A, Kersebaum KC, Kozyra J, Kumar S, Dalla Marta A, Micalel F, Schaap B, Bernard Seguin B, Skjelvag A, Orlandini S (2010) Coincidence of variation in yield and climate in Europe. Agr Ecosyst Environ 139:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pferdmenges F (2007) Occurrence spread and pathogenicity of different beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) isolates, vol 23. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Pferdmenges F, Korf H, Varrelmann M (2009) Identification of rhizomania-infected soil in Europe able to overcome Rz1 resistance in sugar beet and comparison with other resistance-breaking soils from different geographic origins. Eur J Plant Pathol 124:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pin PA, Benlloch R, Bonnet D, Wremerth-Weich E, Kraft T, Gielen JJ, Nilsson O (2010) An antagonistic pair of FT homologs mediates the control of flowering time in sugar beet. Science 330:1397–1400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pin PA, Zhang W, Vogt SH, Dally N, Büttner B, Schulze-Buxloh G, Müller AE (2012) The role of a pseudo-response regulator gene in life cycle adaptation and domestication of beet. Curr Biol 22:1095–1101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson J, Levan A (1939) Tetraploid sugar beets from colchicine treatments. Hereditas 25:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J, Bannayan M, Nezami A, Mehrvar M, Mahmoodi B (2014) Growth analysis of rhizomania infected and healthy sugar beet. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 17:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard-Molard M, Cariolle M (2001) Water and abiotic stresses and genetic improvement. Proc IIRB 64:153–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimpau W (1891) Kreuzungproducte landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen. Landwirtschaft Jahrbuch, vol 20. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush CM, Liu HY, Lewellen RT, Acosta-Leal R (2006) The continuing saga of rhizomania of sugar beets in the United States. Plant Dis 90:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell GE (1969) Different forms of inherited resistance to virus yellows in sugar beet. Proc IIRB 4:131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccomani M, Stevanato P, Trebbi D, McGrath JM, Biancardi E (2009) Molecular and morpho-physiological characterization of sea, ruderal and cultivated beets. Euphytica 169:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghian SY, Johansson E (1992) Genetic study of bolting and stem length in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) using a factorial cross design. Euphytica 65:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitsky VF (1950) Monogerm sugar beets in the United States. Proc ASSBT 7:156–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholten OE, Lange W (2000) Breeding for resistance to rhizomania in sugar beet: a review. Euphytica 112:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanitz F (1938) Die Herstellung polypoider Rassen bei Beta-Rüben und Gemüsearten durch Behandlung mit Colchicin. Züchter 10:278–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Schӓufele WR (1983) Die Viröse Wurzelbӓrtigkeit (Rizomania) der Zuckerrübe – Eine ernste Gefahr für den Rübenbau. Gesunde Pflanz 35:269–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw B, Thomas TH, Cooke DT (2002) Response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) to drought and nutrient deficiency stress. Plant Growth Reg 37:77–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit AL (ed) (1983) Influence of external factors on growth and development of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM, Inman-Bamber NG, Thorburn PJ (2005) Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Res 92:169–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava HM (1996) Genetic diversity for high-temperature tolerance in sugar beet. In: IBGR (ed) Proc IBGR Workshop and WBN Conference. Biodiv Inter 12:67

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanato P, Biscarini F (2015) Digital PCR as new approach to SNP genotyping in sugar beet. Sugar Tech. doi:10.1007/s12355-015-048-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanato P, Zavalloni C, Marchetti R, Bertaggia M, Saccomani M, McGrath JM, Panella LW, Biancardi E (2010) Relationship between subsoil nitrogen availability and sugarbeet processing quality. Agron J 102:17–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanato P, Gui G, Cacco G, Abenavoli MR, Biancardi E, Romano A, Sorgonà A (2013) Morpho–physiological traits of sugar beet exposed to salt stress. Int Sugar J 115:800–809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanato P, Trebbi D, Panella L, Richardson K, Broccanello C, Pakish L, Saccomani M (2014) Identification and validation of a SNP marker linked to the gene HsBvm-1 for nematode resistance in sugar beet. Plant Mol Biol Rep 33:474–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strausbaugh CA, Eujayl I, Rearick E, Foote P, Elison D (2009) Sugar beet cultivar evaluation for storability and rhizomania resistance. Plant Dis 93:632–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sukopp U, Pohl M, Driessen S, Bartsch D (2010) Feral beet-with help from the maritime wild? In: Gressel J (ed) Crop ferality and volunteerism. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1999) Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:5995–6000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuitert G (1994) Epidemiology of rhizomania disease of sugar beet. Dissertation, University Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulbrich E (1934) Chenopodiaceae. In: Engler A, Harms H (eds) Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp 375–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Viard F, Arnaud JF, Delescluse M, Cuguen J (2004) Tracing back seed and pollen flow within the crop–wild Beta vulgaris complex: genetic distinctiveness vs. hot spots of hybridization over a regional scale. Mol Ecol 13:1357–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (ed) (1925) Geschichte der Rübe (Beta) als Kulturpflanze. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • von Lippmann EO (ed) (1929) Geschichte des Zuckers. Verlag Julius Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk CE, Tick JJ (1991) Onderzoek naar tarravermindering door middel van een ronde bietvorm Jaarboek 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner C (1988) Terminologische Fragen in der Rizomaniaforschung. Zuckerindustrie 113:597–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner C (1993) History of the crop. In: Cooke DA, Scott RK (eds) The sugar beet crop: science into practice. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 1–35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RR (1952) Selection for cold tolerance and low temperature germination in sugar beet. J ASSBT 8:407–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann B, Zeddies J (2000) Review: productivity development in sugar beet production and economic evaluation of progress in breeding. Agrarwirtschaft 49:195–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziska LH, McConnell LL (2015) Climate change, carbon dioxide, and pest biology: monitor, mitigate, manage. J Agric Food Chem. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/jf506101h

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Biancardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Biancardi, E., Lewellen, R.T. (2016). Introduction. In: Biancardi, E., Tamada, T. (eds) Rhizomania. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30678-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics