Skip to main content

Topic-Specific Stylistic Variations for Opinion Retrieval on Twitter

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9626))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Twitter has emerged as a popular platform for sharing information and expressing opinions. Twitter opinion retrieval is now recognized as a powerful tool for finding people’s attitudes on different topics. However, the vast amount of data and the informal language of tweets make opinion retrieval on Twitter very challenging. In this paper, we propose to leverage topic-specific stylistic variations to retrieve tweets that are both relevant and opinionated about a particular topic. Experimental results show that integrating topic specific textual meta-communications, such as emoticons and emphatic lengthening in a ranking function can significantly improve opinion retrieval performance on Twitter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: https://about.twitter.com/company/.

  2. 2.

    Available at:  http://terrier.org/.

  3. 3.

    Available at: http://snowball.tartarus.org/.

  4. 4.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_emoticons.

References

  1. Blei, D., Ng, A., Jordan, M.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brody, S., Diakopoulos, N.: Cooooooollllllllll!!!!!!!!!: using word lengthening to detect sentiment in microblogs. In: EMNLP 2011, pp. 562–570 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eguchi, K., Lavrenko, V.: Sentiment retrieval using generative models. In: EMNLP 2006, pp. 345–354 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Go, A., Bhayani, R., Huang, L.: Technical report, Standford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hofmann, T.: Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: SIGIR 1999, pp. 50–57 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong, L., Davison, B.D.: Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter. In: SIGKDD Workshop on SMA, pp. 80–88 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, L., Yu, M., Zhou, M., Liu, X., Zhao, T.: Target-dependent twitter sentiment classification. In: ACL, HLT 2011, pp. 151–160 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg!. In: ICWSM 2011, pp. 538–541 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krestel, R., Fankhauser, P., Nejdl, W.: Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation. In: RecSys 2009, pp. 61–68 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luo, Z., Osborne, M., Wang, T.: An effective approach to tweets opinion retrieval. In: WWW 2013, pp. 1–22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen, F.: A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis of microblogs. In: ESWC 2011 Workshop on ’Making Sense of Microposts’: Big Things Come in Small Packages, pp. 93–98(2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC 2010, pp. 1320–1326 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paltoglou, G., Buckley, K.: Subjectivity annotation of the microblog 2011 realtime adhoc relevance judgments. In: Serdyukov, P., Braslavski, P., Kuznetsov, S.O., Kamps, J., Rüger, S., Agichtein, E., Segalovich, I., Yilmaz, E. (eds.) ECIR 2013. LNCS, vol. 7814, pp. 344–355. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Paltoglou, G., Giachanou, A.: Opinion retrieval: searching for opinions in social media. In: Paltoglou, G., Loizides, F., Hansen, P. (eds.) Professional Search in the Modern World. LNCS, vol. 8830, pp. 193–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, M.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3), 130–137 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramage, D., Dumais, S., Liebling, D.: Characterizing microblogs with topic models. In: ICWSM 2010, pp. 1–8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Read, J.: Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification. In: ACL Student Research Workshop, pp. 43–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strunk, W.: The Elements of Style. Penguin, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Van Canneyt, S., Claeys, N., Dhoedt, B.: Topic-dependent sentiment classification on twitter. In: Hanbury, A., Kazai, G., Rauber, A., Fuhr, N. (eds.) ECIR 2015. LNCS, vol. 9022, pp. 441–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, X., Wei, F., Liu, X., Zhou, M., Zhang, M.: Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. In: CIKM 2011, pp. 1031–1040 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, L., Mimno, D., McCallum, A.: Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collections. In: SIGKDD 2009, pp. 937–946 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yi, J., Nasukawa, T., Bunescu, R., Niblack, W.: Sentiment analyzer: extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In: ICDM 2003, pp. 427–434 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, W.X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.-P., Yan, H., Li, X.: Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In: Clough, P., Foley, C., Gurrin, C., Jones, G.J.F., Kraaij, W., Lee, H., Mudoch, V. (eds.) ECIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6611, pp. 338–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under the project OpiTrack.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Giachanou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Giachanou, A., Harvey, M., Crestani, F. (2016). Topic-Specific Stylistic Variations for Opinion Retrieval on Twitter. In: Ferro, N., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30670-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30671-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics