Skip to main content

Development of a Musculotendon Model Within the Framework of Multibody Systems Dynamics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multibody Dynamics

Part of the book series: Computational Methods in Applied Sciences ((COMPUTMETHODS,volume 42))

Abstract

Human movement is the result of a complex and synergistic interaction between the musculoskeletal and the central nervous system. As result, muscles contract coordinately to produce forces that are transmitted by tendons to the skeletal system, causing its movement or keeping its pose. Often neglected in current muscle models, the elastic properties of tendons play a significant role in the dynamic interaction between the muscular and skeletal systems, influencing the force transmission, energy storage and transfer, and joint control. The aim of this work is to present in detail the necessary steps to incorporate a musculotendon model in the framework of a multibody systems dynamics formulation. A methodology to compute the musculotendon forces and activations is presented based on the use of a Hill-type muscle model assembled in series with a spring-like element defined according to the elastic properties of the tendon. The proposed methodology can be applied, without significant changes, to both inverse and forward dynamic analyses of biomechanical systems. Three daily activities with different levels of musculotendon recruitment are analyzed from an inverse dynamics perspective. The selected activities are walking, running and jumping. The movement data characterizing these activities were acquired experimentally in a movement laboratory. A 3D biomechanical model of the human body, described with natural coordinates and encompassing 43 musculotendon actuators per leg, is proposed to assess the performance of the presented musculotendon model and of its incorporation on the referred multibody dynamics framework. The influence of the introduction of a compliant tendon model on the produced muscle forces and activation patterns is analyzed in face of those same results produced by the same biomechanical model defined with infinitely stiff (or rigid) tendons. Results revealed that the introduction of the tendon model allows muscles to work, predominantly, on their optimal configuration as the dynamic equilibrium generated between muscle and tendon prevents the muscle from support all musculotendon deformation. This not only reduces the activations needed to perform the required contractile forces but it also considerably prevents the development of non-physiological passive forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hoy MG, Zajac FE, Gordon ME (1990) A musculoskeletal model of the human lower extremity: the effect of muscle, tendon, and moment arm on the moment-angle relationship of musculotendon actuators at the hip, knee, and ankle. J Biomech 23(2):157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luzio de Melo P, da Silva MT, Martins J, Newman D (2015) A microcontroller platform for the rapid prototyping of functional electrical stimulation-based gait neuroprostheses. Artif Organs 39(5):E56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Magnusson SP, Narici MV, Maganaris CN, Kjaer M (2008) Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo. J Physiol 586(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thelen DG, Chumanov ES, Best TM, Swanson SC, Heiderscheit BC (2005) Simulation of biceps femoris musculotendon mechanics during the swing phase of sprinting. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(11):1931–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7:255–318

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 126(843):136–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buchanan T, Lloyd D (2004) Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces and joint moments and movements from measurements of neural command. J Appl Biomech 20(4):367–395

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zajac FE (1989) Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 17(4):359–408

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin CF, Schovanec L (1999) The control and mechanics of human movement systems. Dynamical systems, control, coding, computer vision. Springer, New York, pp 173–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Millard M, Uchida T, Seth A, Delp SL (2013) Flexing computational muscle: modeling and simulation of musculotendon dynamics. J Biomech Eng 135(2):21005-1-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira AR (2014) Development of a musculotendon model within the framework of a multibody systems dynamics, MSc thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade Técnica de Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  12. Komura T, Prokopow P, Nagano A (2004) Evaluation of the influence of muscle deactivation on other muscles and joints during gait motion. J Biomech 37(4):425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salinas-Avila A, Moreno-Valenzuela J (2009) Switched control of mechanical systems by using musculotendon actuators. In: 2009 American Control Conference. IEEE, pp 331–336

    Google Scholar 

  14. Delp SL, Loan JP (1995) A graphics-based software system to develop and analyze models of musculoskeletal structures. Comput Biol Med 25(1):21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva MT (2003) Human motion analysis using multibody dynamics and optimization tools. Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade Técnica de Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pereira AF (2009) Development of a hill-type model with fatigue for the calculation of the redundant muscle forces using multibody dynamics. MSc thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico - Universidade Técnica de Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hall JE, Guyton A (2010) Textbook of medical physiology. Elsevier Health Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pandy MG, Barr RE (2004) Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook

    Google Scholar 

  19. Romero F, Melo PL, Silva MT, Alonso FJ (2015) Validation of an artificially activated mechanistic muscle model by using inverse dynamics analysis. Mech Mach Theory 93:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ambrósio JA, Silva M (2005) A biomechanical multibody model with a detailed locomotion muscle apparatus. Adv Comput Multibody Syst 155–184

    Google Scholar 

  21. Garner BA, Pandy MG (2000) The obstacle-set method for representing muscle paths in musculoskeletal models. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 3(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan ML (2000) Efficient optimal control of large-scale biomechanical systems. PhD thesis, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thelen DG (2003) Adjustment of muscle mechanics model parameters to simulate dynamic contractions in older adults. J Biomech Eng 125(1):70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Winters JM (1990) Hill-based muscle models: a systems engineering perspective. Multiple muscle systems. Springer, New York

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. De Jalon JG, Bayo E (1994) Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yamaguchi GT (2005) Dynamic modeling of musculoskeletal motion: a vectorized approach for biomechanical analysis in three dimensions. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P, Kirtley C, Leardini A, Rosenbaum D, Whittle M, D’Lima DD, Cristofolini L, Witte H et al (2002) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 35(4):543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Winter DA (1991) Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological, University of Waterloo Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blaya JA, Herr H (2004) Adaptive control of a variable-impedance ankle-foot orthosis to assist drop-foot gait. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 12(1):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Herzog W, Leonard T (2002) Force enhancement following stretching of skeletal muscle a new mechanism. J Exp Biol 205(9):1275–1283

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meijer K, Grootenboer HJ, Koopman HFJM, van der Linden BJJJ, Huijing PA (1998) A Hill type model of rat medial gastrocnemius muscle that accounts for shortening history effects. J Biomech 31(6):555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rall JA, Woledge RC (1990) Influence of temperature on mechanics and energetics of muscle contraction. Am J Physiol 259(2 Pt 2):R197–203

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stephens JA, Taylor A (1972) Fatigue of maintained voluntary muscle contraction in man. J Physiol 220(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xia T, Frey Law LA (2008) A theoretical approach for modeling peripheral muscle fatigue and recovery. J Biomech 41(14):3046–3052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pereira AF, Silva MT, Martins JM, de Carvalho M (2011) Implementation of an efficient muscle fatigue model in the framework of multibody systems dynamics for analysis of human movements. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-body Dyn 225(4):359–370

    Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor DC, Dalton JD, Seaber AV, Garrett WE (1990) Viscoelastic properties of muscle-tendon units: The biomechanical effects of stretching. Am J Sports Med 18(3):300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) for the support given through Ph.D. grant (SFRH/BD/51574/2011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel T. Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oliveira, A.R., Gonçalves, S.B., de Carvalho, M., Silva, M.T. (2016). Development of a Musculotendon Model Within the Framework of Multibody Systems Dynamics. In: Font-Llagunes, J. (eds) Multibody Dynamics. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30614-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30614-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30612-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30614-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics