Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) represents one of the most difficult tumors to treat and patient survival is dismal at the time of tumor recurrence. Surgical resection, radiation, and systemic chemotherapy do not offer a cure but can extend survival in patients with good prognostic factors. The recently FDA-approved Optune device emits medium frequency (200 kHz) alternating electric fields or Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) that disrupt mitosis of tumor cells. It was demonstrated to have comparable efficacy when compared to standard-of-care chemotherapy treatment for recurrent GBM patients in a randomized phase III trial (EF-11). However, the extent to which this device benefited patients in routine clinical settings was unclear. Therefore, the Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe) was developed to capture protected health information from 457 patients from 91 neuro-oncology treatment centers in the United States from October 2011 to November 2013. Major findings from analysis of this database included a significantly longer overall survival in PRiDe patients as compared to the TTField monotherapy-treated subjects in EF-11 study, 9.6 months versus 6.6 months, respectively. Favorable prognostic factors included patient treatment compliance ≥75 %, treatment at earlier recurrences, and higher Karnofsky performance status. Patients who failed bevacizumab did not benefit from TTFields as much as patients who were bevacizumab naïve. There were no unexpected adverse events and the most common device-related side effects were skin reactions, heat sensations, and electric sensitivities on the scalp. This chapter will review the available evidence supporting the use of TTFields in neuro-oncology with emphasis on the lessons learned from the use of the device in clinical practice after the 2011 FDA approval.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJB, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJB, Janzer RC, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:459–66.
Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Prados MD, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2572–8.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm152295.htm.
Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY, Mikkelsen T, Schiff D, Abrey LE, et al. Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4733–40.
Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K, Duic P, Royce C, Stroud I, et al. Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:740–5.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm251669.htm.
Kirson ED, Wasserman Y, Izhaki A, Mordechovich D, Gurvich Z, Dbaly V, et al. Modeling tumor growth kinetics and its implications for TTFields treatment planning. Neuro-Oncology. 2010;12 Suppl 4:iv48.
Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V, et al. NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2192–202.
Eichler HG, Pignatti F, Flamion B, Leufkens H, Brenckenridge A. Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:818–26.
Lenzer J. FDA committee votes to withdraw bevacizumab for breast cancer. BMJ. 2011;343:d4244.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm280536.htm.
Senderowicz AM, Pfaff O. Similarities and differences in the oncology drug approval process between FDA and European Union with emphasis on in vitro companion diagnostics. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1445–52.
Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS, Wefel JS, Blumenthal DT, et al. A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:699–708.
Chinot OL, Wick W, Mason W, Henriksson R, Saran F, Nishkawa R, et al. Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:709–22.
Tognoni G, Alli C, Avanzini F, Bettelli G, Colombo F, Corso R, et al. Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. BMJ. 1991;303:969–71.
Mrugala MM, Engelhard HH, Dinh Tran D, Kew Y, Cavaliere R, Villano JL, et al. Clinical practice experience with NovoTTF-100A™ system for glioblastoma: the Patient Registry Dataset (PRiDe). Semin Oncol. 2014;41 Suppl 6:S4–13.
Macdonald DR, Casino TL, Schold Jr SC, Cairncross JG. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1277–80.
Taal W, Brandsma D, de Bruin HG, Bromberg JE, Swaak-Kragten AT, Smitt PA, et al. Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide. Cancer. 2008;113:405–10.
Wong ET, Englehard HH, Tran DD, Kew Y, Mrugala MM, Cavaliere R, et al. NovoTTF-100A alternating electric fields therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: an analysis of patient registry data. Can J Neurol Sci. 2014;41:S9.
Wong ET, Englehard HH, Tran DD, Kew Y, Mrugala MM, Cavaliere R, et al. An updated analysis of patient registry data on NovoTTF-100A alternating electric fields therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16 Suppl 5:v74.
Mrugala MM, Graham CA, Rockhill JK, Silbergeld DL. Novo-TTF 100A System used successfully in a patient with a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt. Neuro-Oncology. 2014;16 Suppl 2:ii101.
Kirson ED, Dbalý V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Soustiel JF, Itzhaki A, et al. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:10152–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruzevick, J., Wong, E.T., Mrugala, M.M. (2016). Tumor Treating Fields in Clinical Practice with Emphasis on PRiDe Registry. In: Wong, E. (eds) Alternating Electric Fields Therapy in Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30576-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30576-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30574-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30576-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)