Skip to main content

Clinical Efficacy of Tumor Treating Fields for Recurrent Glioblastoma

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 485 Accesses

Abstract

Recurrent glioblastoma is defined by growth of the enhancing areas on MRI according to the Macdonald’s or Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria but the extent of the tumor is much larger than that can be seen on neuroimaging. Patient prognosis is poor and survival is short. The Optune device is an FDA-approved treatment for recurrent glioblastoma and it uses Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to disrupt tumor cells as they undergo mitosis. In the pivotal EF-11 phase III trial that compared TTFields with Best Physician’s Choice chemotherapy, the two treatments had comparable efficacy with a respective median overall survival of 6.6 and 6.0 months and a hazard ratio of 0.86 (p = 0.27). The median progression free survival of TTFields and chemotherapy was 2.2 months and 2.1 months, respectively, with a hazard ratio of 0.81 (p = 0.16). The most common adverse events associated with the device were grade 1 or 2 scalp dermatitis, and shifting of the arrays slightly during array change and applying topical corticosteroid can minimize this irritation. There were far less hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities when compared to chemotherapy. In post hoc analyses of EF-11, secondary glioblastomas and low dexamethasone usage were notable prognostic factors for survival. In the TTField monotherapy cohort, the median overall survival was 11.0 months among subjects who used ≤4.1 mg/day dexamethasone and 4.8 months among those who took >4.1 mg/day (χ 2 = 34.6, p < 0.0001). This dexamethasone effect was also found in the chemotherapy cohort but in a less robust fashion, with subjects who used ≤4.1 mg/day of dexamethasone having a median overall survival of 8.9 months as compared to those who used >4.1 mg/day having a median overall survival of 6.0 months (χ 2 = 10.0, p = 0.0015). Other prognostic factors include a compliance rate of ≥80 %, no prior treatment with bevacizumab, and Karnofsky performance status ≥80. Therefore, multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors can modulate the outcome of the recurrent glioblastoma under the influence of TTFields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bleeker FE, Molenaar RJ, Leenstra S, et al. Recent advances in the molecular understanding of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2012;108:11–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Hortsmann S, Nishikawa T, Di Patre PL, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res. 2004;64:6892–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Macdonald DR, Casino TL, Schold Jr SC, Cairncross JG. Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1277–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen G, Galanis E, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1963–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong ET, Brem S. Antiangiogenesis treatment for glioblastoma multiforme: challenges and opportunities. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6:515–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Wit MCY, de Bruin HG, Eijkenboom W, Sillevis Smitt PAE, van den Bent MJ. Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression. Neurology. 2004;63:535–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong ET. Tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis in malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2006;77:295–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong ET, Hess KR, Gleason MJ, Jaeckle KA, Kyritsis AP, Prados MD, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2572–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bloch O, Han SH, Cha S, Sun MZ, Aghi MK, McDermott MW, et al. Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:1032–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brem H, Piantadosi S, Burger PC, Walker M, Selker R, Vick NA, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of safety and efficacy of intraoperative controlled delivery by biodegradable polymers of chemotherapy for recurrent gliomas. Lancet. 1995;345:1008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw E, Scott C, Souhami L, Dinapoli R, Kline R, Loeffler J, et al. Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG 90-05. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:291–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Biswas T, Okunieff P, Schell MC, Smudzin T, Pilcher WH, Bakos RS, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2009;4:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Reardon DA, Herndon JE, Peters KB, Desjardins A, Coan A, Lou E, et al. Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwamoto FM, Fine HA. Bevacizumab for malignant glioma. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:285–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R, Dekel E, Itzhaki A, Wasserman Y, et al. Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res. 2004;64:3288–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gera N, Yang A, Holtzman TS, Lee SX, Wong ET, Swanson KD. Tumor treating fields perturb the localization of septins and cause aberrant mitotic exit. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SX, Wong E, Swanson K. Disruption of cell division within anaphase by tumor treating electric fields (TTFields) leads to immunogenic cell death. Neuro-Oncology. 2013;15 Suppl 3:iii66–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Felder CE, Prilusky J, Silman I, Sussman JL. A server and database for dipole moments of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:W512–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sirajuddin M, Farkasovsky M, Hauer F, Kuhlmann D, Macara IG, Weyand M, et al. Structural insight into filament formation by mammalian septins. Nature. 2007;449:311–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yvon AM, Wadsworth P, Jordan MA. Taxol suppresses dynamics of individual microtubules in living human tumor cells. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:947–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kirson ED, Dbaly V, Tovarys F, Vymazal J, Soustiel JF, Itzhaki A, et al. Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:10152–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rulseh AM, Keller J, Klener J, Sroubek J, Dbaly V, Syrucek M, et al. Long-term survival of patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme treated with tumor treating fields. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA, Steinberg D, Engelhard H, Heidecke V, et al. NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomized phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2192–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lacouture ME, Davis ME, Elzinga G, Butowski N, Tran D, Villano JL, et al. Characterization and management of dermatologic adverse events with the NovoTTF-100A System, a novel anti-mitotic electric field device for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Semin Oncol. 2014;41 Suppl 4:S1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong ET, Lok E, Swanson KD, Gautam S, Engelhard HH, Lieberman F, et al. Response assessment of NovoTTF-100A versus best physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma. Cancer Med. 2014;3:592–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong ET, Lok E, Gautam S, Swanson KD. Dexamethasone exerts profound immunologic interference on treatment efficacy for recurrent glioblastoma. Br J Cancer. 2015;113:232–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Back MF, Ang EL, Ng WH, See SJ, Lim CC, Chan SP, et al. Improved median survival for glioblastoma multiforme following introduction of adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36:338–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rutz HP, Hofer S, Peghini PE, Gutteck-Amsler U, Rentsch K, Meier-Abt PJ, et al. Avoiding glucocorticoid administration in a neurooncological case. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4:1186–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pitter KL, Tamagno I, Alikhanyan K, Hosni-Ahmed A, Pattwell SS, Donnola S, et al. Corticosteroids compromise survival in glioblastoma. Brain. 2016;139:1458–1471.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kanner AA, Wong ET, Villano JL, Ram Z, et al. Post hoc analyses of intention-to-treat population in phase III comparison of NovoTTF-100A System versus best physician’s choice chemotherapy. Semin Oncol. 2014;41:S25–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric T. Wong M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wong, E.T. (2016). Clinical Efficacy of Tumor Treating Fields for Recurrent Glioblastoma. In: Wong, E. (eds) Alternating Electric Fields Therapy in Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30576-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30576-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30574-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30576-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics