Skip to main content

A Multidimensional Codifying of FDI Technological and Productivity Spillover Absorption Capacity and Threshold Effects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

Abstract

Understanding the channels and moderating factors of firms’ adoption of foreign technology has important policy implications, as a clearer understanding of the exact mechanisms of learning via foreign investment will allow policymakers to better target appropriate forms of FDI. Multinational media corporations investing in foreign developing countries are believed to possess advantages that enable them to compete with better informed domestic firms. These advantages include intangible productive assets such as technology know-how, management skills, and reputation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89, 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizenman, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (2002). Institutional efficiency, monitoring costs and the investment share of FDI (NBER Working paper No. 9324).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanyam, V. N. (1998). The MAI and foreign direct investment in developing countries (Discussion Paper EC10/98). Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, G., & Gertler, P. (2002). Technology diffusion from foreign direct investment through supply chain (Working paper). Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1996). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(2), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., Kokko, A., & Mucchielli, J. L. (2003). The economics of foreign direct investment incentives (pp. 37–60). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., Kokko, A., & Zejan, M. (1994). Host country competition and technology transfer by multinationals. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, 521–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., & Persson, H. (1983). Foreign investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped economy: Evidence from the Mexican manufacturing industry. World Development, 11(6), 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., & Wolf, E. (1994). Multinational corporations and productivity convergence in Mexico. In W. Baumol, R. Nelson, & E. Wolf (Eds.), Convergence of productivity: Cross-national studies and historical evidence (pp. 263–284). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1971). International corporations: The industrial economics of foreign investment. Economica, 38, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (1974). Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host country markets. Economica, 41(162), 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, Y. C., & Lin, C. M. (1999). Foreign direct investment, R&D and spillover efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing firms. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(4), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corden, W. M. (1967). Protection and foreign investment. Economic Record, 43, 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1992). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. J., & Saggi, K. (2002). Licensing versus direct investment: Implications for economic growth. Journal of International Economics, 56(1), 131–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S. (1979). Foreign direct investment and “spillover” efficiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries. Canadian Journal of Economics, 12(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2001). Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis. Economic Journal, 111(475), 723–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, M., & Harrison, A. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?: Evidence from panel data for Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(3), 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43(2), 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (1996). Productivity spillovers from competition between local firms and foreign affiliates. Journal of International Development, 8(4), 517–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A. (2003). Globalization and FDI policies. The development dimension of FDI: Policy and rule-making perspectives (pp. 29–40). New York: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, F. H. (2009). Does foreign direct investment improve the productivity of domestic firms? Technology spillovers, industry linkages, and firm capabilities. Technology Spillovers, Industry Linkages, and Firm Capabilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebscher, K., Christl, J., Mooslechner, P., & Ritzberger-Grunwald, D. (2007). Foreign direct investment in Europe: A changing landscape. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E. (2004). Home-and host-country effects of foreign direct investment. In R. E. Baldwin & W. Alan (Eds.), Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics (pp. 333–382). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, R. E., & Sjöholm, F. (2005). The impact of inward FDI on host countries: Why such different answers. Does foreign direct investment promote development (Working Paper No 192). pp 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, G. D. A. (1960). The benefits and costs of private investment from abroad: A theoretical approach. Economic Record, 36, 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T. H. (2005). How does FDI affect host country development? Using industry case studies to make reliable generalizations. In T. H. Moran, E. M. Graham, & M. Blomström (Eds.), Does foreign direct investment promote development. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöholm, F. (1999). Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: Evidence from establishment data. Journal of Development Studies, 36(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takii, S. (2005). Productivity spillovers and characteristics of foreign multinational plants in Indonesian manufacturing 1990–1995. Journal of Development Economics, 76(2), 521–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todo, Y., & Miyamoto, K. (2002). Knowledge diffusion from multinational enterprises: The role of domestic and foreign knowledge-enhancing activities (Technical Papers No. 196). OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytell, I., & Yudaeva, K. (2006). The role of FDI in Eastern Europe and new independent states: New channels for the spillover effect. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. M., & Peri, G. (2004). Catching-up to foreign technology? Evidence on the “Veblen-Gerschenkron” effect of foreign investments (NBER Working Paper, w10893).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. Y., & Blomström, M. (1992). Foreign investment and technology transfer: A simple model. European Economic Review, 36(1), 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukowska-Gagelmann, K. (2000). Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment in Poland. Economics Systems, 24(3), 232–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vukanović, Z. (2016). A Multidimensional Codifying of FDI Technological and Productivity Spillover Absorption Capacity and Threshold Effects. In: Foreign Direct Investment Inflows Into the South East European Media Market. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30512-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics