Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Paradigm Shift: From Static to Evolutionary/Dynamic/Transformational/Networked/Modular/Dynamic Business Model Concept

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foreign Direct Investment Inflows Into the South East European Media Market

Part of the book series: Media Business and Innovation ((MEDIA))

  • 493 Accesses

Abstract

In this modern digital world as opposed to the traditional one, translating business strategy into business processes has become much more of a challenge. Business processes are now mainly digitized and ICT enabled. Consequently, today's ICT-based businesses' environment and management are more dynamic, characterized by ongoing fast changes and severe stakeholders' pressure. Therefore, the dynamic BM has risen to prominence as a conceptual and contextual tool of “alignment” to fill the gap between corporate strategy and business processes including their web, Internet, and digital infrastructure, providing crucial harmonization among these organizational layers. A successful business should treat the business strategy, BM, and business processes along with their IS, as a harmonized package. Furthermore, the author argues that the BM is an essential conceptual tool of alignment in digital business. More specifically, it represents an intermediate layer between business strategy and ICT-enabled business processes, fulfilling the missing link created by the complex and digitized environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Achrol, R. S., & Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing in the network economy. The Journal of Marketing, 63, 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2001). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases (4th ed.). New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. (2003). Internet business models and strategies (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Debei, M. M., & Fitzgerald, G. (2010). The design and engineering of mobile data services: Developing an ontology based on business model thinking. In J. Pries-Heje, J. Venable & J. De Gross (Eds.), Human benefits through the diffusion of information systems design science research. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP 8.2+8.6). Boston: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, R., & Zimmermann, H. (2001). Introduction to special section—business models. Electronic Markets, 11(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., Håkansson, H., & Johanson, J. (1994). Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. The Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, L. M. (2001). Emerging E-business models: Lessons from the field. Boston: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, L. M., Austin, R. D., & McFarlan, F. W. (2003). Corporate information strategy and management (6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argoneto, P., & Renna, P. (2010). Production planning, negotiation and coalition integration: A new tool for an innovative e-business model. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1995). Changing the role of top management: Beyond systems to people. Long Range Planning, 28(4), 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwman, H., De Vos, H., & Haaker, T. (2008). Mobile service innovation and business models. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A. (1994). Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. (2010). Government funding cannot save journalism. The Nation, 19 April, www.thenation.com/doc/20100419/carr_video.

  • Chen, J. S., & Ching, R. K. (2002). A proposed framework for transitioning to an e-business model. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(4), 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. L. (2004a). Value creation from the application service provider e-business model: The experience of four firms. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 17(2), 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, W. (2004b). Value creation from E-business models. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahan, N. M., Doh, J. P., Oetzel, J., & Yaziji, M. (2010). Corporate-NGO collaboration: Co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 326–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., & Damanpour, J. A. (2001). E-business e-commerce evolution: Perspective and strategy. Managerial Finance, 27(7), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43, 227–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2011). Managing media work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, R., Ramaswamy, S., Stephenson, E., & Viguerie, S. P. (2014). Management intuition for the next 50 years. McKinsey Quarterly, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38, 1559–1570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubosson‐Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002). E‐business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird International Business Review, 44(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber, E., Ballon, P., Bouwman, H., Haaker, T., Rietkerk, O., & Steen, M. (2003). Designing business models for mobile ICT services. In Workshop on concepts, metrics & visualization, at the 16th Bled electronic commerce conference eTransformation, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, K., Ramaswamy, S., & Rassey, L. (2014). Next-shoring: A CEO’s guide. McKinsey Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J. (2003). Why visualization of e-business models matters. In 16th eCommerce conference eTransformation panel business models & the mobile industry: Concepts, metrics, visualization and cases (pp. 878–883).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J. (2004). E-business model ontologies. In W. Curry (Ed.), e-Business modelling using the e3value ontology (pp. 98–128).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J., & Akkermans, J. M. (2001). Designing and evaluating eBusiness models. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(4), 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J., Akkermans H., & Vliet H. V. (2000). What’s in an electronic business model? In 12th International conference on knowledge engineering and knowledge management, Juan-les-Pins, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordijn, J., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2005). Comparing two business model ontologies for designing e-business models and value constellations. In BLED 2005 Proceedings, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, E., Diego, P., & Pardo, A. (2013). Distributing audiovisual contents in the new digital scenario: Multiplatform strategies of the main Spanish TV networks. In M. Friedrichsen & W. Mühl-Benninghaus (Eds.), Handbook of social media management: Value chain and business models in changing media markets. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? The Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2002). IT and business models: Concepts and theories. Malmö: Liber Ekonomi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedman, J., & Kalling, T. (2003). The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huarng, K. H., & Yu, T. H. K. (2011). Entrepreneurship, process innovation and value creation by a non-profit SME. Management Decision, 49(2), 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., & Nishino, K. (2010). Killing two birds with one stone: Profit for now and learning for the future. Long Range Planning, 43, 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., Kuk, G., & Wagenaar, R. W. (2008). A survey of web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Tiller, E. H. (1999). Integrating market, technology, and policy opportunities in e-business strategy. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(3), 235–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, J., Tinnilä, M., & Tseng, A. (2006). An international comparison of operator-driven business models. Business Process Management Journal, 12(3), 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küng, L. (2011). Managing strategy and maximizing innovation in media organisations. Managing media work. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work (pp. 249–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. (2006a). A business model research schema. In 18th Bled eConference, 06–08 June, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S. (2006b). Do we need a ‘real’ taxonomy of E-business models? School of Commerce research paper series: 06-6, School of Commerce, Flinders University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, J., & Cantrell, S. (2000) Changing business models: Surveying the landscape (Working Paper). Accenture Institute for Strategic Change, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, I. (2005). Dynamic business model framework for emerging technologies. International Journal of Service Technology and Management, 6(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, J. (2010). Remodelling media: The urgent search for new media business models. Media International Australia, 137, 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business models for internet-based e-commerce: An anatomy. California Management Review, 42(4), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Y. (2000). Knowledge management for e-business performance: Advancing information strategy to “internet time”. Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, 16(4), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menasce, D. (2000). Scaling for e-business. In Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on modeling, analysis and simulation of computer and telecommunication systems (pp. 511–513). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. H., & Crane, F. G. (2010). Entrepreneurship: An innovator’s guide to startups and corporate ventures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., & Allen, J. (2005). The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(6), 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. The American Economic Review, 72, 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, D., & Kaplan, R. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. Doctoral thesis, Présentée à l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales de l’Université de Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2002, June 17–19). An e-business model ontology for modeling e-business. In C. Loebbecke, R. T. Wigard, J. Gricar, A. Pucihar & G. Lenart (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Bled electronic commerce conference—eReality: Constructing the eEconomy, Bled, Slovenia (pp. 75–91).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palo, T., & Tähtinen, J. (2011). A network perspective on business models for emerging technology-based services. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(5), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papakiriakopoulos, D., Poylumenakou, A. K., & Doukidis, G. J. (2001). Building e-business models: An analytical framework and development guidelines. In Proceedings of the 14th Bled electronic commerce conference (Vol. 25, p. 26).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2003). A framework for understanding and analyzing ebusiness models. In Proceedings of 16th Bled eCommerce conference on eTransformation, Bled, Slovenia (pp. 329–348).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2004). A research framework for analyzing eBusiness models. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), 302–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2005). Technology innovation-induced business model change: A contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(2), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrovic, O., Kittl, C., & Teksten, D. (2001). Developing business models for eBusiness. In Proceedings of the international conference on electronic commerce, Vienna (pp. 1–6), 31 October–4 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigneur, Y. (2000). The e-business model handbook. École des HEC–Université de Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2001). Strategy and the internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajala, R., & Westerlund, M. (2005). Business models: A new perspective on knowledge-intensive services in the software industry. In BLED 2005 proceedings, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajala, R., & Westerlund, M. (2007). Business models—a new perspective on firms’ assets and capabilities: Observations from the Finnish software industry. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(2), 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, J., & Park, Y. (2009). On the creation and evaluation of e-business model variants: The case of auction. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(3), 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2001). Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 838–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stähler, P. (2002). Business models as an unit of analysis for strategizing. In Proceedings of the 1st International workshop on business models, Lausanne, Suisse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swatman, P. M., Krueger, C., & van der Beek, K. (2006). The changing digital content landscape: An evaluation of e-business model development in European online news and music. Internet Research, 16(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2010). Business model, business strategy, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The new digital economy: How it will transform business: A white research paper produced in collaboration with AT&T, Cisco, Citi, PwC & SAP, Oxford Economics, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tikkanen, H., Lamberg, J. A., Parvinen, P., & Kallunki, J. P. (2005). Managerial cognition, action and the business model of the firm. Management Decision, 43, 789–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kranenburg, H., & Ziggers, G. W. (2013). How media companies should create value: Innovation centered business models and dynamic capabilities. In M. Friedrichsen & W. Mühl-Benninghaus (Eds.), Handbook of social media management: Value chain and business models in changing media markets (pp. 239–267). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vermolen, R. (2010). Reflecting on IS business model research: Current gaps and future directions. In Proceedings of the 13th Twente student conference on IT, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands (pp. 291–299).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2009). IT savvy: What top executives must know to go from pain to gain. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Place to space: Migrating to eBusiness models. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., & Woerner, S. L. (2013). Optimizing your digital business model. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 71–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of International Economics, Finance and Business, UDG – University of Donja Gorica, Podgorica, Montenegro

    Zvezdan Vukanović

Authors
  1. Zvezdan Vukanović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vukanović, Z. (2016). The Paradigm Shift: From Static to Evolutionary/Dynamic/Transformational/Networked/Modular/Dynamic Business Model Concept. In: Foreign Direct Investment Inflows Into the South East European Media Market. Media Business and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30512-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation