Advertisement

Body, Time and Subject

  • José Ignacio MurilloEmail author
Chapter
  • 305 Downloads
Part of the Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action book series (HSNA, volume 2)

Abstract

Is it possible to reconcile an objective, scientific description of the body with the subjective experience of being or having a body? This chapter argues that because an objective account understands subjectivity as a function of the biological organism, it fails to explain the complex and often paradoxical relation between subjectivity and corporeity. Contemporary philosophers such as Plessner, Heidegger and Jonas have pointed out the importance of the concept of life for understanding subjectivity. Moreover, through their analysis of life, they confirm Kant’s insight into the close relationship between subjectivity and temporality. It is no mystery that many attempts to reconcile subjectivity and the body fail to capture movement and time, as they often rely on definitions of living systems for which time is always extrinsic. A different and more successful strategy is to invoke the Aristotelian concept of enérgeia, or perfect activity, to describe the distinctive character of living processes. This notion also illuminates the role of consciousness, which at face value appears to be out of time, thus posing an even harder problem. For Aristotle, consciousness depends on a vital activity: the activity of the intellect (nous). Thus this chapter integrates the discoveries of contemporary biology with key Aristotelian concepts like enérgeia and nous to develop a concept of the living body as a center of coordinated vital activities, including the generation of consciousness, presence and temporality, and to grasp their characteristic temporality as synchrony. This view inspires both an understanding of the body as more than a mere thing, and a means of reconciling the atemporality of conscious experience with the instability and exteriority of our body.

Keywords

Aristotle enérgeia nous Subjectivity Corporeity Temporality Plessner 

References

  1. Aquinas, Th. 1888–1889. Pars Prima Summae Theologiae. Opera omnia, IV–V. Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, Th. 1961. In Summa Contra Gentiles, Books 2–3, ed. P. Marc, C. Pera, and P. Caramello. Turin/Rome: Marietti.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1924. Metaphysics. W.D. Ross, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reprinted 1953 with corrections.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle. 1983. Physics. Books III and IV, trans. with notes E. Hussey. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle. 2002. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. (with historical introduction) Ch. Rowe; philosophical introduction and commentary S Broadie. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Behnke, E. 2004. Edmund Husserl’s contribution to phenomenology of the body in Ideas II. In Phenomenology. critical concepts in philosophy. Volume II: Phenomenology: Themes and issues, ed. D. Moran and L.E. Embree. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carman, T. 1999. The body in Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophical Topics 27(2): 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craig, A.D. 2003. Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13(4): 500–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuchs, Th. 2000. Leib, Raum, Person. Entwurf einer phänomenologischen Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, Th. 2013. Das Gehirn – ein Beziehungsorgan: eine phenomenologische und ökologische Konzeption, 4th edn. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  11. Hegel, G.W.F. 1992. Gesammelte Werke. 20, Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse, (1830). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time. Trans. J. Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, E. 1984. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second Book. Studies in the phenomenology of constitution. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Jonas, H. 1992. Evolution und Freiheit. In Philosophische Untersuchungen und metaphysische Vermutungen. Frankfurt: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Jonas, H. 2001. The phenomenon of life: Toward a philosophical biology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, I. 1998. Critique of pure reason. Trans. A. Wood and P. Guyer. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Leder, D. 1990. The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. The philosopher and his shadow. In Signs. Trans. R. McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2010. Oeuvres. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  21. Metzinger, Th. 2003. Being no one. The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Murillo, J.I. 1999. ¿Son realmente autónomas las ciencias? In Fe y Razón. I Simposio Internacional Fe cristiana y cultura contemporánea, ed. J. Aranguren, J. Borobia, and M. Lluch. Pamplona: Eunsa.Google Scholar
  23. Murillo, J.I. 2008. Health as a norm and principle of intelligibility. In Natural law: Historical, systematic and juridical approaches, ed. A.N. García, M. Silar, and J.M. Torralba. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Murillo, J.I. 2009. ¿Comprender la libertad? Entre la biología y la metafísica. Anuario Filosófico, XLII/2: 391–418.Google Scholar
  25. Murillo, J.I. 2011. Apariencia y realidad del yo: una aproximación crítica a la propuesta de Thomas Metzinger. In Asalto a lo mental. Neurociencias, consciencia y libertad, ed. F. Rodríguez Valls, C. Diosdado, and J. Arana. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.Google Scholar
  26. Plessner, H. 1981. Gesammelte Schriften. IV: Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  27. Polo, L. 2003. Antropología trascendental. Tomo II: La esencia de la persona humana. Pamplona: Eunsa.Google Scholar
  28. Polo, L. 2006. Curso de teoría del conocimiento. Tomo I. Pamplona: Eunsa.Google Scholar
  29. Saborido, Ch, M. Mossio, and A. Moreno. 2011. Biological organization and cross-generation functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheler, M. 1973. Formalism in ethics and non-formal ethics of values. A new attempt toward the Foundation of an Ethical Personalism. Trans. M.S. Frings and R.L. Funk. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  31. von Schelling, F.W.J. 2000. System des Transzendentalen Idealismus. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  32. Schmitz, H., R.O. Müllan, and J. Slaby. 2011. Emotions outside the box—The new phenomenology of feeling and corporeality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10(2): 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sider, T. 2001. Four-dimensionalism. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snell, B. 2000. Die Entdeckung des Geistes: Studien zur Entstehung des europäischen Denkens bei den Griechen. Göttingen: Vadenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  35. Sokolowski, R. 2008. Phenomenology of the human person. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spaemann, R., and R. Löw. 2005. Natürliche Ziele: Geschichte und Wiederentdeckung des teologischen Denkens. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  37. von Bertalanffy, L. 1969. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  38. Welton, D. 1999. The body: Classic and contemporary readings. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mind-Brain Group, Institute for Culture and Society (ICS)University of NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations