Advertisement

Self-Consciousness, Personal Identity, and the Challenge of Neuroscience

  • Dieter SturmaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action book series (HSNA, volume 2)

Abstract

Contrary to popular belief, neuroscience poses no threat to human freedom, as there is no fundamental conflict between the manifest image of man and the naturalism of neurobiology and other neuroscientific disciplines. It cannot be denied that neuroscience does not leave our self-understanding untouched but it is difficult to ascertain how deep this influence reaches. While naturalistic approaches in general presuppose the ontological unity of reality and the formal unity of the sciences, scientific eliminativism takes the language of natural science as the ultimate semantics for describing what there is. This approach excludes the most important aspects of the mind: the epistemic, emotive and moral states of self-conscious persons. In contrast, varieties of integrative naturalism such as the one defended here do not give primacy to a particular scientific position, but rather distinguish between the space of reasons and the realm of causes and grant both a non-eliminable methodological status. Moreover, integrative naturalism takes account of the fact that the remarkable quality of self-consciousness consists in the fact that reference arises through an act of self-reference that in itself is referentially differentiated. In order to gain an understanding of the identity of a person over time in its entirety, one has to refer to psychological and physical constituents of her continuity in space and time. Thus, while neuroscience can identify aspects of the manifest mind, only an integrative naturalism can meet the requirements for explaining the phenomenon of self-conscious being in the world.

Keywords

Personal identity Consciousness Self-consciousness Space of reasons Integrative naturalism Neuroscience Manifestations of the Mind 

References

  1. Ayer, A.J. 1956. The problem of knowledge. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, L.R. 2000. Persons and bodies. A constitution view. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, M.R., and P.M.S. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Bermúdez, J.L. 1998. The paradox of self-consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cassam, Q. 1994. Self-knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Castañeda, H.-N. 1999. The phenomeno-logic of the I. Essays on self-consciousness. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chalmers, D. 1996. The conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chisholm, R.M. 1976. Person and object: A metaphysical study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Chisholm, R.M. 1981. The first person: An essay on reference and intentionality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crick, F. 1995. The astonishing hypothesis. The scientific search for the soul. London: Scribner.Google Scholar
  11. d’Holbach, P.Th. 1990. Système de la Nature, ed. J. Boulad-Ayoub. Paris: Librairie-Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
  12. de La Mettrie, J.O. 1960. L’Homme Machine. In La Mettrie’s L’Homme Machine. A study in the origins of an idea, ed. A. Vartanian. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dennett, D.C. 1981. Brainstorms. Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  14. Descartes, R. 1964. Meditationes de Prima Philosophia. In Œuvres de Descartes, VII, ed. Ch. Adam and P. Tannery. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, G. 1982. The varieties of reference. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  16. Feigl, H. 1967. The “mental” and the “physical”. The essay and a postscript. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hampshire, S. 1959. Thought and action. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  18. Hurley, S. 1998. Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kant, I. 1781/1787. 1956. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  20. Leibniz, G.W. 1704. Nouveaux Essais sur l’Entendement humain. In Philosophische Schriften, Bd. 5. Hildesheim: Olms 1978.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, D. 1970. An argument for the identity theory. Journal of Philosophy 63: 17–25.Google Scholar
  22. Locke, J. [1694]. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Moran, R. 2001. Authority and estrangement. An essay on self-knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, J. 2002. Identity, personal identity and the self. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  27. Schelling, F.W.J. 1856–1861. Fernere Darstellung aus dem System der Philosophie. In Sämmtliche Werke, IV, ed. K.F.A. Schelling. Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
  28. Sellars, W. 1963. Science, perception and reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Sellars, W. 1974. … this I or he or it (the thing) which thinks …. In Essays in philosophy and its history, 62–92. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sellars, W. [1956]. 1997. Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shoemaker, S. 1963. Self-knowledge and self-identity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Shoemaker, S. 1968. Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy 65: 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shoemaker, S., and R. Swinburne. 1984. Personal identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Strawson, P.F. 1959. Individuals. An essay in descriptive metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strawson, P.F. 1966. Self, mind and body. In Freedom and resentment and other essays. London: Methuen 1974.Google Scholar
  36. Sturma, D. 1985. Kant über Selbstbewußtsein. Zum Zusammenhang von Erkenntniskritik und Theorie des Selbstbewußtseins. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
  37. Sturma, D. 1997. Philosophie der Person. Die Selbstverhältnisse von Subjektivität und Moralität. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  38. Sturma, D. 1998. Reductionism in Exile? Herbert Feigl’s identity theory and the mind-body problem. Grazer Philosophische Studien 54: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sturma, D. 2005. Philosophie des Geistes. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
  40. Sturma, D. 2007. Person as subject. In Dimensions of personhood (Journal of Consciousness Studies), ed. H. Ikäheimo and A. Laitinen. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  41. Sturma, D. 2008. Die Natur der Freiheit. Integrativer Naturalismus in der theoretischen und praktischen Philosophie. Philosophisches Jahrbuch 115, 2: 385–396. Halbband.Google Scholar
  42. Swinburne, R. 1986. The evolution of the soul. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor, Ch. 1985. Human agency and language, Philosophical papers, 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tugendhat, E. 1975. Existence in space and time. Neue Hefte für Philosophie 8: 14–33.Google Scholar
  45. Wegner, D.M. 2002. The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: Bradford.Google Scholar
  46. Wiggins, D. 1967. Identity and spatio-temporal continuity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  47. Wiggins, D. 1980. Sameness and substance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Wiggins, D. 1987. Truth, invention, and the meaning of life. In Needs, values, truth. Essays in the philosophy of value. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  49. Wilkes, K.V. 1988. Real people. Personal identity without thought experiments. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, B. 1973. Problems of the self. Philosophical papers 1956–1972. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, B. 1978. Descartes: The project of pure enquiry. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  52. Williams, B. 1984. The scientific and the ethical. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 17: 209–228.Google Scholar
  53. Wright, C., B.C. Smith, and C. Macdonald. 1998. Knowing our own minds. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Philosophy, University of BonnInstitute of Science and Ethics (IWE), German Reference Centre of Ethics in the Life Sciences (DRZE)BonnGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Ethics in the Neurosciences (INM-8)Research Centre JülichJülichGermany

Personalised recommendations