Skip to main content

Detoxification of Acid Drainage Using Inorganic pH Buffers in a Constant Flow Bioreactor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 290 Accesses

Part of the book series: Environmental Earth Sciences ((EESCI))

Abstract

To substantially reduce the acclimatization period for SRB in a highly acidic medium, we studied some effective pH buffers for flowing AMD. Silicate buffers increased pH before SRB was introduced. A mixture of AMD and sewage-sludge-impregnated ryegrass from a previous incubation contained an enriched strain of Desulfovibrio vulgaris, one of two major SRBs. They were active at a pH above 5 at 30 °C for six days, producing a black coloration probably because of the precipitation of sulfide, thereby initially suggesting the concentrated presence of viable SRB. The in situ pH was 6.3. The odor of H2S was detected from the inoculants. An up-flow bioreactor made from rigid PVC tubing with sampling ports placed 5 cm apart in the column was plugged with rubber seals. The treatment consisted of ground ryegrass mixed thoroughly with a mollisol soil. Freshly cut ryegrass ground to <1 mm diameter was hand-mixed with the mollisol in 1:5 ratio (w/w) and the mixture placed on the sand in the column to occupy the column volume, except for a 10 cm wide space at the top of the column. An electrically powered peristaltic pump slowly pumped the AMD into the column from the bottom, until the top of the treatment material in the column was just covered with the influent. The pH was measured after 1 day. At the end of 20 days without any added lime, the oxide achieved the highest pH increase of all the buffers. The bioreactor supported sulphate reduction at continuous flow rates of 30, 60, 90, and 180 ml day−1. The results of this study show that it is possible to establish an SRB population in a constant flow reactor, using readily decomposable material and a fast-acting soil-based buffer. It was concluded that cation exchange capacity (CEC), and not merely free lime, was the crucial buffer characteristic at the low pH level of <3.0 units. The CEC of the substrate used in this study was three times that of a sludge buffer used by Harris and Ragusa (2000). The only effective substrate difference (excluding the influent flow rate) between the present study and that of Harris and Ragusa (2000) is that of the buffers used. Hence, it was concluded that for pH increases, and decreases of soluble cations in AMD, CEC is a major determining factor among the buffering materials. Where sources of lime are insufficient, the use of medium to high organic C soil-based buffers with small quantities of lime can be an effective alternative for activating SRB in a reactor.

Original article: Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using decomposable plant material in a constant flow bioreactor. Environmental Geology Volume 40, Issue 10, pp. 1192–1204.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander M (1976) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation. In: Alexander M (ed) Introduction to soil microbiology. Wiley, New York, pp 305–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander M (1977) Soil microbiology, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, pp 362–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ, Bowden JW (1987) A comparison of models for describing the adsorption of anions A on a variable charge mineral surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 119(1):236–250. doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(87)90263-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell FG, Donnelly LJ (2006) Mining and its impact on the environment. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt GH, Bruggenwert MGM (eds) (1976) Soil Chemistry. Part A. Basic Elements, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p 281

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruggenwert MGM, Hiemstra T and Bolt GH (1991) Proton sink in soil controlling soil acidification. In: Ulrich B, Sumner ME (eds) Soil acidity. Springer, Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro JM, Moore JN (2000) Pit lakes: their characteristics and the potential for their remediation. Environ Geol 39:1254–1260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang IS, Shin PK, Kim BH (2000) Biological treatment of acid mine drainage under sulphate-reducing conditions with solid waste materials as substrate. Water Res 34:1269–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen NL, et al. (1996) The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol Appl (6)3: 665–691

    Google Scholar 

  • Church CD, Wilkin RT, Alpers CN, Rye RO, McCleskey RB (2007) Microbial sulfate reduction and metal attenuation in pH 4 acid mine water. Geochem Trans 8(10):297–300. http://www.imwa.info/docs/imwa_2008/IMWA2008_076_Martins.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Connel WE, Patrick WH Jr (1968) sulphate reduction in soil: effects of redox potential and pH. Science 159:86–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravotta CA (2003) Ecosystem restoration: size and performance of anoxic limestone drains to neutralize acidic mine drainage. J Environ Qual 32:1277–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JG, Bosqui FL, Lanouetle KH (1972) Removing heavy metal from waste waters. Environ Sci Technol 6:518–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande TL, Greenland DJ, Quirk JP (1964) Role of iron oxides in the bonding of soil particles. Nature 201:107–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz de Villalvilla L, Milia I, Santa-Cruz M, Aguirre G (2003) Formación Los Pasos: Geología, Geoquímica y su comparación con el Caribe. In: Estudios sobre los Arcos Volcánicos de Cuba. Centro Nacional de Información Geológica. I.G.P. CD, Cuba, pp. 54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bray E (2004) Preliminary compilation of descriptive geoenvironmental mineral deposit models. U.S Geological Survey. Open File Report. 95–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak DH, Hedin RS, Edenborn HM, McIntire PB (1992) Treatment of metal-contaminated water using bacterial sulphate reduction: results from pilot-scale reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 40(5):609–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott P, Ragusa S, Catcheside D (1998) Growth of sulphate reducing bacteria under acidic conditions in an upflow anaerobic bioreactor as a treatment system for acid mine drainage. Water Res 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa L, Seyler J, Wildeman T (2004) Characterization of organic substrates used for anaerobic bioremediation of mining impacted waters. In: Proceedings of the international mine water association conference, Newcastle, pp 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Frömmichen R, Kellner S, Friese K (2003) Sediment conditioning with organic and/or inorganic carbon sources as a first step in alkalinity generation of acid mine pit lake water (pH 2–3). Environ Sci Tech 37:1414–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil A (1998) Drinking water in developing countries annual review of energy and the environment, vol 23 pp 253–286 (Volume publication date November 1998) doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.23.1.253

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibert O, de Pablo J, Cortina JL, Ayora C (2002) Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulphate-reducing bacteria using permeable reactive barriers: a review from laboratory to full-scale experiments. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1:327–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gyure RA, Konopka A, Brooks A, Doemel W (1990) Microbial sulphate reduction in acidic (pH 3) strip-mine lakes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:193–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Handreck K (1996) Losses of iron in leachates from organic components of potting media. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 27(9–10):1996. doi:10.1080/00103629609369688

    Google Scholar 

  • Hard B, Friedrich CS, Babel W (1997) Bioremediation of acid mine water using facultatively methylotrophic metal-tolerant sulphate reducing bacteria. Microbiol Res 152:65–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MA, Ragusa S (2000) Bioremediation of acid drainage using decomposable plant material and sludge. Environ Geol 40(1/2):195–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris MA, Ragusa S (2001) Bioremediation of acid mine drainage using decomposable organic matter in a constant-flow bioreactor. Environ Geol 40:1192–1240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herhily AT, Mills AL (1985) sulphate reduction in freshwater sediments receiving acid mine drainage. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Herhily AT, Mills AL, Hornberger GM, Bruckner AE (1987) The importance of sediment sulphate reduction to the sulphate budget of an impoundment receiving acid mine drainage. Water Resources Research 23(2):287–292. doi:10.1029/WR023i002p00287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hore-Lacy I (1978) Sulphide ores: an overview of the effect of mining. In: Rummery RA, Howes KMW (eds) Management of lands affected by mining. Division of Land Resources Management, CSIRO, Australia, pp 111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • James AL, Mrost MJ (1965) Control of acidity of tailings dams and dumps as a precursor to stabilization by vegetation. Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 65:488–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaksonen AH, Franzmann PD, Puhakaka JA (2003) Performance and ethanol oxidation kinetics of a sulphate-reducing fluidized-bed reactor treating acidic metal-containing wastewater. Biodegradion 14:207–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalin M, Fyson A, Smith MP (1993) ARUM acid reduction using microbiology. In: Biohydrometallurgical technologies. http://origin-ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0883292710000533-si1.gif. Accessed 1 June 2015

  • Katyal JC (1977) Influence of organic matter on the chemical and electro-chemical properties of some flooded soils. Soil Biol Biochem 9:259–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivaisi AK (2001) The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review. Ecol Eng 16:545–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschorreck M (2008) Microbial sulphate reduction at a low pH. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:329–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koschorreck, Boehrer B, Friese K, Geller W, Schultze M, Wendt-Potthoff K (2011) Oxygen depletion induced by adding whey to an enclosure in an acidic mine pit lake. Ecol Eng 37(12):1983–1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschorreck M, Frömmichen R, Herzsprung P, Tittel H, Wendt-Potthoff K (2002) The function of straw for in situ remediation of acidic mining lakes: results from an enclosure experiment. Water Air Soil Pollut 2:97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuck PH (2009) Nickel: U.S. geological survey mineral commodity summaries 2009, pp 110–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar RN, McCullough CD, Lund MA (2011) How does storage affect the quality and quantity of organic carbon in sewage for use in the bioremediation of acidic mine waters? Ecol Eng 37:1205–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Clint R, McCullough D, Lund MA (2013) Upper and lower Concentration thresholds for Bulk Organic Substrates in Bioremediation of Acid Mine Drainage. Mine Water Environ 32:285–292. doi:10.1007/s10230-013-0242-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen VJ, Schierup H (1981) The use of straw for removal of heavy metal from waste water. J Environ Qual 10(2):188–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • López JM, Moreira J, Pantaleon GJ, Lavandero RM, Montano J, Cruz-Martín J (1998) Tipos mineralógicos de algunos yacimientos auríferos de Cuba. III Congreso Cubano de Geología y Minería (GEOMIN 98). Geología y Minería 98. La Habana, pp 371–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyew D, Knowles R, Sheppard J (1994) The biological treatment of acid mine drainage under continuous flow conditions in a reactor. Trans Inst Chem Eng 72:42–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti SK (2003) Moef report, an assessment of overburden dump rehabilitation technologies adopted in CCL, NCL, MCL, and SECL mines (Grant no. J-15012/38/98-IA IIM)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough CD, Lund MA (2011) Bioremediation of acidic and metalliferous drainage (AMD) through organic carbon amendment by municipal sewage and green waste. J Environ Manage 92:2419–2426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough CD, Lund MA, May JM (2006) Microcosm testing of municipal sewage and green waste for full-scale remediation of an acid coal pit lake, in semi-arid tropical Australia. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD). American society of mining and reclamation (ASMR), St Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller AG, Hall GC, Nemchin AA, O’Brien Darren (2008) Chronology of the Pueblo Viejo epithermal gold-silver deposit, Dominican Republic—Formation in an Early Cretaceous intra-oceanic island arc and burial under ophiolite: Minera Deposita, Nov 2008, vol 43(8), pp 873–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Muga HE, Mihelcic JR (2008) Sustainability of wastewater treatment technologies. J. Environ. Manage. 88:437–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muyzer G, Stams AJM (2008) The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:441–454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpal S, Chuichulcherm S, Livingston A, Peeva L (2000) Ethanol utilization by sulphate-reducing bacteria: an experimental and modeling study. Biotechnol Bioeng 70:533–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro JA, Lopez Caloma, Perez Garcia A (2000) Characterization of groundwater flow in the Bailin hazardous waste-disposal site (Huesca, Spain). Environ Geol 40(1, 2):217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton SA, Kahl JS, Henriksen A, Wright RF (1990) Buffering of pH depressions by sediments in streams and lakes. In: Norton SA, Lindberg SE, Page AL (eds) Acidic precipitation, vol 4., Soils, aquatic processes and lake acidificationSpringer, Berlin, pp 132–157

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnamperuma FM (1972) The chemistry of submerged soils. Adv Agron 24:29–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postgate J (1984) The Sulphate-Reducing Bacteria, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Primelles L, Alvarado B, Torres M (2003) Campo Mineral Maclama. Breve Caracterización Geológica y Mineralógica de la mineralización Oro-Telurídica. Tipos esperados de depósitos. In: Estudios sobre los Arcos Volcánicos de Cuba. CD. Centro Nacional de Información Geológica. I.G.P, Cuba, pp 33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Primelles L, Barroso A, Lugo R, Escobar E (1998) Geología y Metalogenia del Campo Mineral Guaimaro. Enfoque actual. III Congreso Cubano de Geología y Minería (GEOMIN 98). La Habana. pp 390–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Redwood SD (2009) Dominican Republic packs a punch: Mining Journal, Jan 23, p. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P (2010) Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: a review. Int J Soil Sediment Water 3(2), Article 13, ISSN 1940-3259

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon G, Kessler SE, Russell N, Hall CM, Bell D, Piñero E (1999) Epithermal gold mineralization in an old volcanic arc: the Jacinto deposit, Camagüey District. Cuba. Economic Geology. 94:487–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh B, Odeh IOA, McBratney AB (2003) Acid buffering capacity and potential acidification of cotton soils in northern New South Wales. Aust J Soil Res 41:875–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh Y, Singh B, Khind CS (1992) Nutrient transformations in soils amended with green manures. Adv Soil Sci 20:238–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HA, Stephenson PR (2011) Pueblo Viejo gold project Dominican Republic Technical Report for Pueblo Viejo Dominicana Corporation, Barrick gold corporation. Goldcorp Inc, AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HA, Stephenson PR, Butcher MG, Carr CA (2008) Pueblo Viejo Gold Project: Dominican Republic Technical Report. Canadian Securities Administration. https://www.sec.gov/.../o40716exv99w1.htm

  • Strosnider WH, Nairn RW (2010) Effective passive treatment of high strength acid mine drainage and raw municipal wastewater in Potosí, Bolivia using simple mutual incubations and limestone. J Geochem Explor 105:34–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strosnider WH, Winfrey BK, Nairn RW (2009) Performance of an ecologically-engineered multi-stage acid mine drainage and municipal wastewater passive co-treatment system. Paper was presented at the 2009 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation, Billings, MT. In: Barnhisel RI (ed) Revitalizing the environment: proven solutions and innovative approaches, 30 May–5 June 2009. Published by ASMR, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdall JM, Oades JM (1982) Organic matter and water-stable aggregates in soils. J Soil Sci 33:141–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toth J (1968) Deposition of submarine crusts rich in manganese and iron. Geological Society of America Special Paper 521(91)1, pp. 44–54, doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1980)9

  • Tsukamoto TK, Killion HA, Miller GC (2004) Column experiments for microbiological treatment of acid mine drainage: low-temperature, low-pH and matrix investigations. Water Res 38:1405–1418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Breemen N, Mulder J, Driscoll CT (1983) Acidification and alkalization of soils. Plant & Soil 75(3):283–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacaster S (2010) The mineral industries of the islands of the Caribbean Aruba, The Bahamas, Barbados, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, and Other Islands. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. August 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlaf GR, Kairies CL and Schroeder KT (2003) Flushing of metals from reducing and alkaline producing systems. Paper presented at the 2003 National Meeting of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation and the 9th Billings Land Reclamation Symposium, Billings, MT, June 3–6, 2003. Published by ASMR, 3134 Montavesta Rd., Lexington, KY 40502

    Google Scholar 

  • Waybrant KR, Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ (1998) Selection of reactive mixtures for use in permeable reactive walls for treatment of mine drainage. Environ Sci Tech 32:1972–1979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitbread-Abrutat PH (2008) Mining legacy survey: informing the background paper [cited 2012 August 7]. Post-Mining Alliance, Eden Project. Available from: http://www.postmining.org/documents/surveysummaryreportFINAL25Feb08.pdf

  • Younger PL, Banwart SA, Hedin RS (2002) Mine Water: Hydrology, Pollution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Remediation

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Tian-ren (1985) Physical chemistry of paddy soils. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Anglin Harris .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, M.A., Ragusa, S. (2016). Detoxification of Acid Drainage Using Inorganic pH Buffers in a Constant Flow Bioreactor. In: Geobiotechnological Solutions to Anthropogenic Disturbances. Environmental Earth Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30465-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics