Advertisement

BA Thesis Writing Process and Pre-service Teachers’ Beliefs on Teaching Writing

  • Łukasz SalskiEmail author
  • Weronika Szubko-Sitarek
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

This paper reports on a series of studies carried out among Polish students writing their BA theses in English as a foreign language. As their specialty area, the students chose teaching English as a foreign language, and they were, at the same time, receiving pre-service teacher training. With these studies, originally intended as action research on our classes, we aimed to shed some light not only on their writing processes, that is how their BA theses come into being, but also on how they develop as writers, and how this development influences their attitudes and beliefs regarding teaching writing skills in English as a foreign language.

References

  1. Atkinson, D. (2003). Writing and culture in the post-process era. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attardo, S., & Brown, S. (2005). What’s the use of linguistics? Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs towards language use and variation. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 91–102). New York: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Busch, D. (2010). Pre-service teacher beliefs about language learning: The second language acquisition course as an agent for change. Language Teaching Research, 14, 318–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching. A guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dahl, K., & Farnan, N. (1998). Children’s writing: Perspectives from research. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  6. Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar
  7. Florio-Ruane, S., & Lensmire, T. J. (1990). Transforming future teachers’ ideas about writing instruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Learning to teach writing: Does teacher education make a difference?. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kennedy, M. M. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 54–86). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Kent, T. (1999). Post-process theory. Beyond the writing process paradigm. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lo, Y.-H. G. (2005). Relevance of knowledge of second language acquisition: An in-depth case study of a non-native EFL teacher. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 135–158). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Lortie, D. C. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. MacDonald, M., Badger, R., & White, G. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning and teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsuda, P. K. (2003). Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porter, A. C., & Brophy, J. (1988). Synthesis of research on good teaching: Insights from the work of the Institute for research on teaching. Educational Leadership, 45, 74–85.Google Scholar
  18. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905–947). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  20. Tarone, E., & Allwright, D. (2005). Second language teacher learning and student second language learning: Shaping the knowledge base. In D. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 5–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Tobin, L. (2001). Process pedagogy. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper, & K. Schick (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies (pp. 1–18). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Zalewski, J. (2004). Epistemology of the composing processes: Writing in English for general academic purposes. Opole: University of Opole Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ŁódźŁódźPoland

Personalised recommendations