Skip to main content

Interfacing Belief-Desire-Intention Agent Systems with Geometric Reasoning for Robotics and Manufacturing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1304 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 640))

Abstract

Unifying the symbolic and geometric representations and algorithms used in AI and robotics is an important challenge for both fields. We take a small step in this direction by presenting an interface between geometric reasoning and a popular class of agent systems, in a way that uses some of the agent’s available constructs and semantics. We then describe how certain kinds of information can be extracted from the geometric model of the world and used in agent reasoning. We motivate our concepts and algorithms within the context of a real-world production system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    R is short for \( Robot \), F for \( From \), T for \( To \) and \( ti \) for \( table\; i \).

  2. 2.

    An action-rule’s body is adapted from STRIPS to be a sequence of functions that return a (possibly empty) set of literals, each of which is applied to the belief base B, i.e. the positive literals are added to B, and atoms associated with negative literals are removed from B.

  3. 3.

    For simplicity we omit the last parameters of \( {\text{INT}}(p, \varvec{v}) \), which may be \( null \) constants.

References

  1. Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Proceedings of the MAAMAW Workshop, pp. 42–55 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Silva, L., Pandey, A.K. Alami, R.: An interface for interleaved symbolic-geometric planning and backtracking. In: IROS, pp. 232–239 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Srivastava, S., Fang, E., Riano, L., Chitnis, R., Russell, S., Abbeel, P.: Combined task and motion planning through an extensible planner-independent interface layer, ICRA, pp. 639–646 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lagriffoul, F., Dimitrov, D., Saffiotti, A., Karlsson, L.: Constraint propagation on interval bounds for dealing with geometric backtracking, IROS, pp. 957–964 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erdem, E., Haspalamutgil, K., Palaz, C., Patoglu, V., Uras, T.: Combining high-level causal reasoning with low-level geometric reasoning and motion planning for robotic manipulation, ICRA, pp. 4575–4581, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Plaku, E. Hager, G.D.: Sampling-based motion and symbolic action planning with geometric and differential constraints, ICRA, pp. 5002–5008 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dornhege, C., Eyerich, P., Keller, T., Trüg, S., Brenner, M. Nebel, B.: Semantic attachments for domain-independent planning systems, ICAPS, pp. 114–121 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaschler, A., Kessler, I., Petrick, R., Knoll, A.: Extending the knowledge of volumes approach to robot task planning with efficient geometric predicates. ICRA, (2015) (To appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaelbling, L.P., Lozano-Pérez, T.: Integrated task and motion planning in belief space. IJRR 32(9–10), 1194–1227 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. LaValle, S.M.: Planning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Antzoulatos, N., Castro, E., de Silva, L., Ratchev, S.: Interfacing agents with an industrial assembly system for “plug and produce”. In AAMAS, pp. 1957–1958 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Amit Kumar Pandey and the reviewers for useful feedback. Felipe thanks CNPq for support within grant no. 306864/2013-4 under the PQ fellowship and 482156/2013-9 under the Universal project programs. The other authors are grateful for support from the Evolvable Assembly Systems EPSRC project (EP/K018205/1), and the PRIME EU FP7 project (Grant Agreement: 314762).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lavindra de Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Silva, L. et al. (2016). Interfacing Belief-Desire-Intention Agent Systems with Geometric Reasoning for Robotics and Manufacturing. In: Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Thomas, A., McFarlane, D. (eds) Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 640. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30337-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30337-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30335-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30337-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics