Skip to main content

Capturing Digest Emotions by Means of Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 639))

Abstract

Distilling sentiments and moods hidden in the written (natural) language is a challenging issue which attracts research and commercial interests, aimed at studying the users behavior on the Web and evaluating the public attitudes towards brands, social events, political actions. The understanding of the written language is a very complicated task: sentiments and opinions are concealed in the sentences, typically associated to adjectives and verbs; then the intrinsic meaning of some textual expressions is not amenable to rigid linguistic patterns. This work presents a framework for detecting sentiment and emotion from text. It exploits an affective model known as Hourglass of Emotions, a variant of Plutchik’s wheel of emotions. The model defines four affective dimensions, each one with some activation levels, called ‘sentic levels’ that represent an emotional state of mind and can be more or less intense, depending on where they are placed in the corresponding dimension. Our approach draws from the Computational Intelligence area to provide a conceptual setting to sentiment and emotion detection and processing. The novelty is the fuzzy linguistic modeling of the Hourglass of Emotions: dimensions are modeled as fuzzy linguistic variables, whose linguistic terms are the sentic levels (emotions). This linguistic modeling naturally enables the use of fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators (from Computing with Words paradigm), such as LOWA (Linguistic Ordered Weighted Averaging) that inherently accomplishes an aggregation of the emotions in order to get an emotional expression that synthesizes a set of emotions associated with different sentic levels and activation intensities. The whole process for the emotion detection and synthesis is described through its main tasks, from the text parsing up to emotions extraction, returning a predominant emotion, associated with each dimension of the Hourglass of Emotions. An ad-hoc ontology has been designed to integrate lexical information and relations, along with the Hourglass model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://sentiwordnet.isti.cnr.it/.

  2. 2.

    https://jena.apache.org/.

  3. 3.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/jwordnet/.

  4. 4.

    http://lodlive.it/.

  5. 5.

    http://jena.apache.org/documentation/serving_data/index.html.

  6. 6.

    Java WordNet Similarity Library: http://grid.deis.unical.it/similarity/.

  7. 7.

    Generalizing, the average calculation can be applied on all element whose value is greater than a fixed threshold.

  8. 8.

    http://www.affective-sciences.org/researchmaterial.

References

  1. Agarwal, A., Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O., Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media. LSM’11, pp. 30–38. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, B., Hu, M., Cheng, J.: Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the web. In: Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-05), pp. 342–351. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005). doi:10.1145/1060745.1060797

  3. Baccianella, A.E.S., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta, Malta (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barbosa, L., Feng, J.: Robust sentiment detection on twitter from biased and noisy data. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters. COLING’10, pp. 36–44. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cabrerizo, F.J., Martinez, M.A., Gijon, J.L., Esteban, B., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A new quality evaluation model generating recommendations to improve the digital services provided by the academic digital libraries. Word Congress of International Fuzzy System Association, Surabaya-Bali, Indonesia (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Camarda, D.V., Mazzini, S., Antonuccio, A.: Lodlive, exploring the web of data. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems, I-SEMANTICS’12, pp. 197–200. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012). doi:10.1145/2362499.2362532. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2362499.2362532

  7. Cambria, E., Hussain, A., Havasi, C., Eckl, C.: Sentic computing: Exploitation of common sense for the development of emotion-sensitive systems. In: Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5967, pp. 148–156. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cambria, E., Speer, R., Havasi, C., Hussain, A.: Senticnet: a publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cataldi, M., Ballatore, A., Tiddi, I., Aufaure, M.A.: Good location, terrible food: detecting feature sentiment in user-generated reviews. Soc. Netw. Anal. Mining, 1–15 (2013). doi:10.1007/s13278-013-0119-7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chuang, Z., Wu, C.: Multi-modal emotion recognition from speech and text. Int. J. Comput. Linguis. Chin. Lang. Process. 9(2), 1–18 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hussain, E.C.A., Havasi, C., Eckl, C.: Affectivespace: blending common sense and affective knowledge to perform emotive reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. El-Nasr, M.S., Yen, J., Ioerger, T.R.: Flamefuzzy logic adaptive model of emotions. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 3(3), 219–257 (2000). doi:10.1023/A:1010030809960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heradio, R., Cabrerizo, F.J., Fernandez-Amoros, D., Herrera, M., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A fuzzy linguistic model to evaluate the quality of library 2.0 functionalities. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33(4), 642–654 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic owa operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 79(2), 175–190 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kannan, K., Goyal, M., Jacob, G.: Modeling the impact of review dynamics on utility value of a product. Soc. Netw. Anal. Mining 1–18 (2012). doi:10.1007/s13278-012-0086-4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the OMG! In: ICWSM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, B.: Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synth. Lect. Human Lang. Technol. 5(1), 1–167 (2012). doi:10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loia, V., Senatore, S.: A fuzzy-oriented sentic analysis to capture the human emotion in web-based content. Know.-Based Syst. 58, 75–85 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.09.024

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miles, A., Matthews, B., Wilson, M., Brickley, D.: Skos core: simple knowledge organisation for the web. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications: Vocabularies in Practice, DCMI’05, pp. 1:1–1:9. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pang, B., Lee, L.: A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL’04. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J.: Wordnet: similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Demonstration Papers at HLT-NAACL 2004, pp. 38–41. Association for Computational Linguistics (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J.: WordNet: Similarity: measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: Demonstration Papers at HLT-NAACL 2004. HLT-NAACL-Demonstrations’04, pp. 38–41. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plutchik, R.: The nature of emotions. Am. Sci. 89(4), 344–350 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poria, S., Gelbukh, A., Hussain, A., Howard, N., Das, D., Bandyopadhyay, S.: Enhanced senticnet with affective labels for concept-based opinion mining. IEEE Intell. Syst. 28(2), 31–38 (2013). doi:http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.4

    Google Scholar 

  26. Saif, H., He, Y., Alani, H.: Semantic sentiment analysis of Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on The Semantic Web—Part I. ISWC’12, pp. 508–524. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strapparava, C., Mihalcea, R.: Learning to identify emotions in text. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC’08, pp. 1556–1560. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008). doi:10.1145/1363686.1364052

  28. Subasic, P., Huettner, A.: Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9(4), 483–496 (2001). doi:10.1109/91.940962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Suchanek, F.M., Kasneci, G., Weikum, G.: Yago: A large ontology from wikipedia and wordnet. Web Semant. 6(3), 203–217 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B.: The impact of online user reviews on hotel room sales. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 28(1), 180–182 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Inf. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Senatore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brenga, C., Celotto, A., Loia, V., Senatore, S. (2016). Capturing Digest Emotions by Means of Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation. In: Pedrycz, W., Chen, SM. (eds) Sentiment Analysis and Ontology Engineering. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 639. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30319-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30319-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30317-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30319-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics