Abstract
Many reports exist of courses in which a flipped classroom model was implemented, putting a much greater emphasis on conducting various learning activities during class. The redesign of existing university lecture courses as flipped classrooms, however, is limited by reports that simply describe learning activities and their effects on individual courses. In this study, two different university courses were redesigned as flipped classrooms and evaluated based on observation, survey, and interview data collected. The comparative analysis of the different course implementations and learner responses of each case showed that the type and amount of learning activities in the redesigned classrooms varied by levels of the learners, the subject matter, the teaching approaches of the previous course, and the types of activities that instructors thought were significant but insufficient. Moreover, surveys and interviews with learners on positive and negative aspects of the online video lectures, learning activities, assignments, and the overall flipped classroom model revealed differences based on characteristics of learners and composition of learning activities. This study is significant in demonstrating that flipped classrooms can be designed and managed according to the diverse composition of different courses, and in providing guidance on how to design a flipped course based on its unique features.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, J. W. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Proceedings from the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning. 9–17. Jacksonville, FL.
Bates, S., & Galloway, R. (2012). The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: A case study. Proceedings from the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference. Heslington, York: The Higher Education Academy.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flipped your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘Flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Education Digest, 78(1), 36.
Deslauriers, L., Schellew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large- enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862–864.
Frydenberg, M. (2013). Flipping excel. Information Systems Education Journal, 11(1), 63–73.
Gannod, G., Burge, J., & Helmick, M. (2008). Using the inverted classroom to teach software engineering. Proceedings from the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE.
Johnson, L. W. & Renner, J. D. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
Kang, K., Kim, C., Ahn, C., & Kim, S. (2014). Operating model and methods development of courses applied flipped learning for department of combined work and learning (Research Report 2014-2). Byungcheon, Korea.
Kim, B. (2014). Development of flipped classroom model for teaching profession courses. Education General Research, 12(2), 25–56.
Kim, N., Jeon, B., & Choi, J. (2014). A case study of flipped learning at college: Focused on effects of motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3), 467–492.
Kim, B., & Kim, B. (2014). Korean language culture and discussion class: Role-exchange discussion class based on flipped learning. Woorimal Research, 37, 141–166.
Lage, M. J., & Platt, G. J. (2000). The internet and the inverted classroom. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 11.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43.
Lee, T. (2012). Teaching & learning innovation at KAIST: Education 3.0 Initiative. Proceedings from the International Presidential Forum on Global Research Universities: Effective Education and Innovative Learning. Seoul, Korea
Lim, C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, H., & Han, H. (2014). Comparative case study on designing and applying flipped classroom at universities. Proceedings from the 11th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA).
Shin, J. (2014). A case analysis of the educational effect of ‘Flip’ teaching method using presentation and discussion videos—Focusing on the students participating the course of <Thinking and Expression 1> in Chosun University. General Education Research, 8(3), 133–163.
Stone, B. B. (2012). Flip your classroom to increase active learning and student engagement. Proceedings from the 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. Madison, WI.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the division of e-learning contents development and system management in the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) at Seoul National University (SNU) and funded by SNU. We would like to offer words of gratitude to Prof. Kwon and Prof. Shim are the instructors of the Calculus 2 and the Nonlinear Systems Theory. In addition, thanks to the teaching assistants, the research assistants, and the whole learners of the two courses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lim, C., Kim, S., Lee, J. (2016). Designing the Flipped Classroom in Higher Education. In: Spector, J., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Isaias, P. (eds) Competencies in Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30295-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30295-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30293-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30295-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)