Skip to main content

Redundant Information Rejection in Sensor Localisation Using System Gramians

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Topics in Modal Analysis & Testing, Volume 10

Abstract

Sensors placement is important in vibration testing. The method of effective independence, recently extended to account for triaxial sensors, is widely used for this purpose in case a finite element model of the structure is available. In this paper a criteria is added to reject redundant information that usually arises in symmetric structures or finite element models with high candidate sensor density. A sensor placement strategy is proposed in which, initially, the method of effective independence is used to select the best sensors from a candidate set by maximising the Fisher information matrix determinant. Next, the gramians of a balanced realisation is used to compare the information between systems consisting of only previously added sensors to the final set with systems of the previous and candidate sensors. Sensors with redundant information will have negligible effect on the gramian and can be rejected. The method is fast, as gramians of systems with only one or two outputs are evaluated. It is sub-optimal in the sense that all possible sensor placement combinations are not evaluated for optimality. A test case, consisting of a rectangular plate, is presented, but the method has been used on a large scale industrial model with good results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kammer, D.C.: Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 14, 251–259 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kammer, D.C., Tinker, M.L.: Optimal placement of triaxial accelerometers for modal vibration tests. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 18, 29–41 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kammer, D.C.: Sensor set expansion for modal vibration testing. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 19, 700–713 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, D.S., Li, H.N., Fritzen, C.P.: The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement. J. Sound Vib. 305, 945–955 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, D.-S., Li, H.-N., Fritzen, C.-P.: A note on fast computation of effective independence through QR downdating for sensor placement. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23, 1160–1168 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reynier, M., Abou-Kandil, H.: Sensors location for updating problems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 13, 297–314 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gawronski, W., Lim, K.B.: Balanced actuator and sensor placement for flexible structures. Int. J. Control 65, 131–145 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hac’, A., Liu, L.: Sensor and actuator location in motion control of flexible structures. J. Sound Vib. 167, 239–261 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lim, K.B.: Method for optimal actuator and sensor placement for large flexible structures. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 15, 49–57 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trendafilova, I., Heylen, W., Brussel, H.V.: Measurement point selection in damage detection using the mutual information concept. Smart Mater. Struct. 10, 528 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stephan, C.: Sensor placement for modal identification. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 27, 461–470 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Laub, A.J.: Matrix Analysis for Scientists and Engineers, p. 182. SIAM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, B.: Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability observability, and model reduction. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 26, 17–32 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kammer, D.C.: Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 19, 729–731 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Golub, G.H., Loan, C.F.V.: Matrix Computations, 738 pp. JHU Press, Baltimore (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gibanica, M., Abrahamsson, T.J.S., Olsson, M.: Calibration, validation and cross-validation of nominally identical car subframes. In: Proceedings of the 34th IMAC, Orlando, FL, January 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Volvo Car Corporation is gratefully acknowledged for providing the funding for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mladen Gibanica .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gibanica, M., Abrahamsson, T.J.S., Kammer, D.C. (2016). Redundant Information Rejection in Sensor Localisation Using System Gramians. In: Mains, M. (eds) Topics in Modal Analysis & Testing, Volume 10. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30249-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30249-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30248-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30249-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics