Abstract
This paper applies spatial dynamic panel data models to analyse the labor market dimension of interregional population flows among German federal states in the period 1993–2009. Making use of recent improvements in the estimation of space-time dynamic panel data models and the computation of meaningful scalar summary measures for the obtained regression coefficients, the empirical results show that the network of German interregional gross migration flows is subject to serial and spatial autocorrelation patterns, which affect the interpretation of the considered regional labor market signals. Using a time-dynamic spatial Durbin model as preferred empirical specification, the results indicate that regional differences in real income growth, the labor participation rate and real-estate prices impact on interregional out-migration flows. The estimated coefficients signs of the obtained space-time summary measures thereby hint at the validity of the neoclassical migration model in predicting gross out-migration flows. In order to take a closer look at the dynamic evolution the direct and indirect network effects over time, cumulative multipliers for a time horizon of up to 10 years have been computed for each variable. The results show that the speed of adjustment of the migration response towards the long-run impact of labor market signals is fast and mostly occurs within the first 3 years. Regarding the interplay of the direct and indirect effects, the estimation results uniformly hint at additive linkages for all variables. Overall, the obtained results underline the importance of a decomposition of the total effects of labor market signals on interregional migration flows by means of their spatial and temporal network dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the migration literature, typically the terms ‘interregional’ and ‘internal’ migration are used interchangeably to define pairwise migratory movements between different regions of a national territory. Throughout the remainder of this manuscript, I will use the former term.
- 2.
- 3.
For a general classification scheme of different combination including time-space lags in a regression framework, see Anselin et al. (2007).
- 4.
Additionally, it reduces the likely problem of multicollinearity among the regressors given that spatial dependence tends to arise from temporal dependence.
- 5.
The first two sample years after German re-unification are dropped due to missing data and structural breaks in the time series.
- 6.
A description of variable definitions and data sources is given in the appendix (see Table A.1).
- 7.
Regression details for the auxiliary wage equation can be obtained from the author upon request.
- 8.
Distance between two states is thereby calculated as the road distance in kilometers between a population weighted average of combination of pairs among the (up to three) major cities for each federal state.
- 9.
For T = 19, the sample range includes all available time periods from 1991–2009. As outlined above, for estimation purposes, the first 2 years after German re-unification will be dropped later on.
- 10.
Detailed test results can be obtained from the author upon request.
- 11.
- 12.
For static SARAR specifications, Zimmer (2008) reports values for ρ ranging from 0.23 to 0.48.
- 13.
Detailed test results are given in Table A.2 the appendix.
- 14.
As Elhorst (2011) points out, although the calculation of the above effects is straightforward, no direct statistical inference on these measures can be performed. The reason is that they are composed of different coefficient estimates according to complex mathematical formulas and the dispersion of the effects depends on the dispersion of all coefficient estimates involved. This paper thus follows LeSage and Pace (2009), Elhorst (2011) and simulates the distribution of the effects using the estimated variance-covariance of the regression analysis.
- 15.
We restrict the computation of weight matrices to a minimum threshold distance of d = 175 km in order to avoid modelling network flows without neighbors in the network.
References
Alecke B, Mitze T, Untiedt G (2010) Internal migration, regional labour market dynamics and implications for German East-West disparities: results from a panel VAR. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft/Rev Reg Res 30(2):159–189
Anselin L, Le Gallo L, Jayet H (2007) Spatial panel econometrics. In: Matyas L, Sevestre P (eds) The econometrics of panel data fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin
Arbia G, Fingleton B (2008) New spatial econometric techniques and applications in regional science. Pap Reg Sci 87(3):311–317
Brücker H, Trübswetter P (2004) Do the best go West? An analysis of the self-selection of employed East-West migrants in Germany. IZA Discussion Papers No.986
Büchel F, Schwarze J (1994) Die Migration von Ost- nach Westdeutschland - Absicht und Realisierung. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung 27(1):43–52
Burda MC (1993) The determinants of East-West German migration. Some first results. Eur Econ Rev 37:452–461
Burda MC, Hunt J (2001) From reunification to economic integration: productivity and the labour market in East Germany. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:1–92
Burridge P (1981) Testing for a common factor in a spatial autoregression model. Environ Plan A 13(7):795–800
Chun J (1996) Interregional migration and regional development. Avebury Press, Aldershot
Chun Y (2008) Modelling network autocorrelation within migration flows by eigenvector spatial filtering. J Geogr Syst 10(4):317–344
Chun Y, Griffith D (2011) Modelling network autocorrelation in space-time migration flow data: an eigenvector spatial filtering approach. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(3):523–536
Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial and temporal analysis: autocorrelation in space and time. In: Wrigley N, Bennett R (eds) Quantitative geography: a British view, Chap. 10 Routledge, London, pp 104–110
Debarsy N, Ertur C, LeSage J (2011) Interpreting dynamic space-time panel data models. Stat Methodol, online first
Destatis (2012) Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Wanderungen. Fachserie 1, Reihe 1.2, various issues. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis), download from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Bevoelkerung/Wanderungen/Wanderungen.html
Devillanova C, Garcüa-Fontes W (2004) Migration across Spanish provinces: evidence from the social security records (1978–1992). Investig Econ 28(3):461–487
Elhorst JP (2010) Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer M, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 377–407
Elhorst JP (2011) Matlab software for spatial panels. In: IVth world conference of the spatial econometrics association (SEA), Chicago, 9–12 June 2010. Revised version in Spring 2011, download from: http://www.regroningen.nl/elhorst/software.shtml
Elhorst JP (2012) Dynamic spatial panels: models, methods and inferences. J Geogr Syst 14:5–28
Etzo I (2011) The Determinants of recent interregional migration flows in Italy: a panel data analysis. J Reg Sci 51(5):948–966
Fisher M, Griffith DA (2008) Modelling spatial autocorrelation in spatial interaction data: an application to patent citation data in the European union. J Reg Sci 48(5):969–989
Fotheringham A (1983) A new set of spatial-interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environ Plan A 15:15–36
Griffith DA (1981) Interdependence in space and time: numerical and interpretative considerations. In: Griffith DA, MacKinnon R (eds) Dynamic spatial models. Plenum, New York, pp 258–287
Hagen-Zanker J (2008) Why do people migrate? A review of the theoretical literature. MPRA Paper 28197, University Library of Munich, Germany
Harris JR, Todaro MP (1970) Migration, unemployment and development: a two sector analysis. Am Econ Rev 60:126–142
Hu P, Pooler J (2002) An empirical test of the competing destinations model. J Geogr Syst 4:301–323
Hunt J (2006) Staunching emigration from East Germany: age and the determinants of migration. J Eur Econ Assoc 4(5):1014–1037
Im K, Pesaran M, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74
Kiviet J (1995) On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 68:53–78
Lee L, Yu J (2010) A spatial dynamic panel data model with both time and individual fixed effects. Econ Theory 26(2):564–597
LeSage J, Pace RK (2008) Spatial econometric modeling of origin-destination flows. J Reg Sci 48(5):941–967
LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, New York
LeSage J, Pace RK (2010) The biggest myth in spatial econometrics (December 1, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1725503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1725503.
Lopez F, Matilla-Garcia M, Mur J, Ruiz M (2011) Testing for the hypothesis of independence in spatio-temporal data. Pap Reg Sci 90(3):663–685
Lütkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin
Mutl J, Pfaffermayr M (2010) A note on the Cliff and Ord test for spatial correlation in panel models. Econ Lett 108(2):225–228
Parikh A, Van Leuvensteijn M (2003) Interregional labour mobility, inequality and wage convergence. Appl Econ 35:931–941
Pesaran H (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J Appl Econ 22:265–312
Rainer H, Siedler T (2009) Social networks in determining migration and labour market outcomes: evidence from the German Reunification. Econ Transit 17(4):739–767
Roos M (2006) Regional price levels in Germany. Appl Econ 38(13):1553–1566
Schwarze J, Wagner G (1992) Abwanderung von Arbeitskrüften und Einkommenspolitik. DIW Wochenbericht 59:58–61
Sjaastad L (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 70(5):80–93
Südekum J, Blien U (2004) Wages and employment growth: disaggregated evidence for West Germany. IZA Discussion Papers 1128, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Tzavalis E (2008) Structural breaks and unit root tests for short panels. In: 15th international conference on panel data, Bonn
VGRdL (2012) Volkswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnungen der Bundesländer (Regional Accounts for German States), download from: http://www.vgrdl.de/VGRdL/
Wagner G (1992) Arbeitslosigkeit, Abwanderung und Pendeln von Arbeitskrüften der neuen Bundeslünder. In: Sozialer Fortschritt, pp 84–89
Zierahn U (2012) The importance of spatial autocorrelation for regional employment growth in Germany. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft/Rev Reg Res 31(1):19–43
Zimmer M (2008) Network effects on domestic migration flows across Germany – A spatial autoregressive perspective with spatially structured origin and destination effects and heteroskedastic innovations. In: Seventh workshop on spatial econometrics and statistics, Paris, 9–10 June 2008
Acknowledgements
I thank the editors of this book, Giuseppe Arbia and Roberto Patuelli, as well as an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments. Moreover, I acknowledge the help from Gordon Hughes by sharing his Stata code.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitze, T. (2016). On the Mutual Dynamics of Interregional Gross Migration Flows in Space and Time. In: Patuelli, R., Arbia, G. (eds) Spatial Econometric Interaction Modelling. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30196-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30196-9_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30194-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30196-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)