Advertisement

Conceptualizing the Urban System as a System of Flows

  • Pavel HolubecEmail author
Chapter
  • 940 Downloads
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

With increasing part of humanity living in cities and with the complexification of urban issues, there is a growing need of the theory of the urban. My question is, how to put the various strands of research on urban matters together. I suppose that a theory of complex self-referential systems is well equipped for this task. Therefore, I respecified Luhmann’s concepts in the urban realm. As a result, I suggest a theory of self-referential systems of flows. Such systems reduce the complexity that is resulting from spatial dispersal of people and social systems. What emerges as constraints of systems of flows are channels, accumulations and centers, that, when solidified, may become cities.

Keywords

Systems theory Self-referential Complexity Differentiation Flow City Urban Center Emergence System of flows Flow theory of cities Çatalhöyük 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No. SGS15/183/OHK1/3T/11 “Public spaces as an intersection and treatment of the problems of contemporary settlements.”

References

  1. Batty, M.: Building a science of cities. Current Research in Cities, online preprint. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008 (2011)
  2. Bertalanffy, L.: General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  3. Baynes, T.M.: Complexity in Urban Development and Management: Historical Overview and Opportunities. J. Ind. Ecol. 13(2) (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S.: The Laws of Form (2nd edn.) New York (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2013: http://www.catalhoyuk.com/downloads/Archive_Report_2013.pdf (2013)
  6. De Landa, M.: A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History. Swerve Editions, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  7. Harvey, D.: Possible Urban Worlds. The Fourth Megacities Lecture. Amersfoort, Twynstra Gudde Management Consultants (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Hodder, I.: Çatalhöyük: The Teopard’s Tale. Thames and Hudson, London (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Holubec, P.: Proces modernity a jeho artikulace v prostorové struktuře území [Dissertation thesis; translation of its title: The Process of Modernity and its Articulation in Spatial Structure of Territory], ČVUT v Praze (2013a)Google Scholar
  10. Holubec, P.: Cities facing gaia. In: Urban Environs in the Relation to Sustainable Development Agenda. Czech Technical University in Prague, pp. 10–21 (2013b)Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs, J.: The economy of cities. Vintage, New York (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Luhmann, N.: Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1995)Google Scholar
  13. Manson, S.M.: Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum 32(2001), 405–414 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maturana, H.R.: The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 7(3):313–332 (1975)Google Scholar
  15. Maturana, H.R.: Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit: Ausgewählte Arbeiten zur biologischen Epistemologie. Braunschweig (1982)Google Scholar
  16. Offe, C.: The utopia of the zero option. Modernity and modernization as normative political criteria. In: PRAXIS International, 1:1–24 (1987)Google Scholar
  17. Reitsma, F.: A response to simplifying complexity. Geoforum 34(2003), 13–16 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin III, F.S., Lambin, E.F., Lenton, T.M., Scheffer, M., et al.: Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:32 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. Silva, E., Wu, N.: Surveying models in urban land studies. J. Plann. Lit. 27(2):139–152. doi:  10.1177/0885412211430477 (2012)
  20. Santé, I., García, A.M., Miranda, D. Crecente, R.: Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: A review and analysis. In: Landscape and Urban Planning vol. 96, Issue 2, pp. 108–122. 30 May 2010Google Scholar
  21. Taylor, P.J.: Extraordinary cities: early ‘city-ness’ and the invention of agriculture and states. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 36.3:415–447. May 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01101.x (2012)
  22. United Nations.: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). ISBN 978-92-1-151517-6 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. von Foerster, H.: On self-organizing systems and their enviroment. In: Yovits, M.C., Cameron, S.: (eds.) Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 31–50. London (1960)Google Scholar
  24. von Foerster, H., Zipf, G.W.: (eds.) Principles of Self-Organization. Oxford (1962)Google Scholar
  25. von Foerster, H.: On constructing a reality. In: Preser, W.F.E.: (ed.) Environmental Design Research, vol. 2, pp. 35–46. Stroudsburg, Pa (1973)Google Scholar
  26. Yovits, M.C., Cameron, S. (eds.): Self-Organizing Systems. Oxford (1960)Google Scholar
  27. Yovits, M.C., Jacobi, G.T., Goldstein, G.G. (eds.): Self-Organizing Systems. Washington (1962)Google Scholar
  28. Zeleny, M. (ed.): Autopoiesis: A Theory of Living Organization. New York (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Urban Design, Town and Regional PlanningCzech Technical University in PraguePraha 6Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations