Skip to main content

Domain Oriented Interdisciplinarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Interdisciplinary Knowledge Organization

Abstract

We have often in preceding chapters stressed the complementarity of domain analysis with the sort of comprehensive classification advocated in this book. A classification such as we have proposed will work for scholars from different domains only if the terminology of those domains has been accurately translated into the terminology employed within the comprehensive classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We focus on those types of domain analysis with the greatest implications for classification. We do not, for example, discuss network analysis here because the purpose of network analysis is to identify the connections among researchers.

References

  • Association for Interdisciplinary Studies (AIS) (2013) About interdisciplinarity. http://www.oakland.edu/ais/

  • Bruschini C, Ardaillon D, Unbehaum S (1998) Tesauro para Estudos de Gënero e sobre Mulheres. Fundación Carlos Chagas, Sao Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan M, Pahre R (1990) Creative marginality: innovation at the intersection of social sciences. Westview, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenisson P, Glänzel W, Persson O (2005) Combining full-text analysis and bibliometric indicators. A pilot study. Scientometrics 63(1):163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze S (1996) Mapping of RandD structures in transdisciplinary areas: new biotechnology in Food Science. Scientometrics 37(2):313–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjørland B (2002) Domain analysis in information science. Eleven approaches—traditional as well as innovative. J Doc 58(4):422–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Information Centre and Archives for the Women’s Movement (IIAV) (1998) European Women’s thesaurus. IIAV, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto de la Mujer (España). Centro de Documentación (2002). Tesauro “Mujer”. Madrid, Instituto de la Mujer, 1999. 6ª ed. Rev. 2002. http://www.mtas.es/mujer/t2002.doc

  • Jacob S (2008) Cross-disciplinarization. A new talisman for evaluation? Am J Eval 29(2):175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien C-A, Tirilly P, Dinneen J, Guastavino C (2013) Reducing subject tree browsing complexity. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 64:2201–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobashi NY, Smit JW, Talamo MGM (2001) A função da terminologia na construção do objeto da Ciência da Informação. DataGramaZero–Revista de Ciência da Informação 2(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ (2006a) Análisis del dominio interdisciplinar para la representación y organización del conocimiento. Conferencia invitada en Memória, Informaçao e Organização do Conhecimento: Cruzando as fronteiras da identidade. UNIRIO-IBICT, Río de Janeiro, pp 209–236

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ (2006b) Thematic map of interdisciplinary domains based on their terminological representation. The gender studies. In: Budin G, Swertz C, Mitgutsch K (eds) Knowledge Organization for a Global Learning Society. Proceedings of the ninth international ISKO conference, Vienna. Ergon, Würzburg, pp 331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ (2006c) Aproximación a un modelo para la construcción de mapas temáticos en dominios interdisciplinares. First international conference on multidisciplinary information sciences and technologies, InSciT2006, Cáceres. Instituto Abierto del Conocimiento, Badajoz. pp 548–552

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ (2007) Comment on the León Manifesto. www.iskoi.org/ilc/leon.php

  • López-Huertas MJ (2008) Cultural impact on knowledge representation and organization in a subject domain. In: Arsenault C, Tennis J (eds) Culture and identity in Knowledge Organization, Proceedings of the 10th international ISKO conference, Montréal. Ergon, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ (2009) La terminología como método para representar y organizar dominios multidimensionales. 1er Simposio sobre Organización del Conocimiento: Bibliotecología y Terminología. UNAM, México

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ, Barité M (2002) Knowledge representation and organization of Gender Studies on the Internet: towards integration. In: López-Huertas MJ (ed) Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century. Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of 7th international ISKO conference, Granada. Ergon, Würzburg

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ, Jiménez Contreras E (2004) Spanish research in Knowledge Organization (1992–2001). Knowl Org 31(3):136–150

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Huertas MJ, Barité M, Torres I (2004) Terminological representation of specialized areas in conceptual structures: the case of Gender Studies. In: McIlwaine IC (ed) Proceedings of the 8th international ISKO conference. Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, pp 263–268

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine S (2014) Concept mapping model, academic disciplines, and interdisciplinarity. Crossing Border Int J Interdiscipl Stud 2(1):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya F, López-Huertas MJ (2000) An automatic model for updating the conceptual structure of a scientific discipline. In: Beghtol C, Howarth L, Williamson N (eds) Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization. Proceedings of the sixth international ISKO conference. Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, pp 55–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter AL, Rafols I (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81(3):719–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafols I, Meyer M (2010) Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case study of bio-nanoscience. Scientometrics 82:263–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repko AF (2012) Interdisciplinary research: process and theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwechheimer H, Winterhager M (2001) Mapping interdisciplinary research fronts in neuroscience: a bibliometric view to retrograde amnesia. Scientometrics 51(1):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastiá i Salat M (1988) Thesaurus d’història social de la Dona. Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiraglia RP (2012) Epistemology of domain analysis. In: Smiraglia RP, Lee H (eds) Cultural frames of knowledge. Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, pp 111–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostak R (2014) Classifying the humanities. Knowl Org 41(4):263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomov DT, Mutafov HG (1996) Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics 37(2):267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szostak, R., Gnoli, C., López-Huertas, M. (2016). Domain Oriented Interdisciplinarity. In: Interdisciplinary Knowledge Organization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30148-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30148-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30147-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30148-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics