Skip to main content

Liver Resection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Liver Disorders

Abstract

Liver resection has been transformed from a high-risk procedure to one that is now performed frequently with a minimal mortality and acceptable morbidity. In-depth preoperative assessment and risk stratification of patients undergoing liver surgery, in addition to advancements in perioperative care and surgical techniques, play a significant role in risk reduction. This chapter aims to emphasize important aspects of preoperative evaluation such as assessment of liver function and prediction of the future liver remnant. Operative guidelines and essential techniques, such as minimal invasive liver surgery, are also addressed in addition to alternative management for nonsurgical candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Belghiti J et al. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191(1):38–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruix J, Sherman M, Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005;42(5):1208–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Srinevas K, Andrew S, Ryan S, Gamblin TC, et al. Major liver resection in elderly patients: a multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(5):787–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho S, Steel J, Tsung A, et al. Safety of liver resection in the elderly: how important is age? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(4):1088–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordlinger B et al. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: a prognostic scoring system to improve case selection based on 1,568 patients. Association Française de Chirurgie. Cancer. 1996;77(7):1254–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagao T et al. Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical features and long-term prognosis. Ann Surg. 1987;205(1):33–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Child CG et al. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pugh RN et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60(8):646–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamath PS et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology. 2001;33(2):464–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam CM et al. Major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with an unsatisfactory indocyanine green clearance test. Br J Surg. 1999;86(8):1012–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shoup M et al. Volumetric analysis predicts hepatic dysfunction in patients undergoing major liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(3):325–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shindoh J, Tzeng CW, Aloia T, et al. Optimal future liver remnant in patients treated with extensive preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azoulay D et al. Percutaneous portal vein embolization increases the feasibility and safety of major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in injured liver. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):665–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, et al. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling 2-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):405–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubin GD. 3-D imaging with MDCT. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45 Suppl 1:S37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmucci S et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary pathology. Radiol Med. 2010;115:732–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strasberg S. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jarnagin WR et al. A prospective analysis of staging laparoscopy in patients with hepatobiliary primary and secondary malignancies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:34–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kooby DA et al. Influence of transfusions on perioperative and long-term outcome in patients following hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2003;237(6):860–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jarnagin W et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg. 2002;236:397–407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Balaa FK, Gamblin TC, Tsung A, et al. Right hepatic lobectomy using the staple technique in 101 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(2):338–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc. 1992;6:97–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection: 2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Buell JF et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):619–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen KT et al. Minimally invasive liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional, international report of safety, feasibility, and early outcomes. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):842–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Clark Gamblin M.D., M.S. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fathi, A.H., Gamblin, T.C. (2017). Liver Resection. In: Saeian, K., Shaker, R. (eds) Liver Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30103-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30103-7_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30101-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30103-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics