Advertisement

Using Routine Quality of Life Assessment to Improve Effectiveness of Community Mental Health Care

  • Domenico GiaccoEmail author
  • Stefan Priebe
Chapter
  • 607 Downloads

Abstract

The assessment of quality of life (QoL) refers to how patients experience important domains of their life such as personal relationships, employment, housing, and physical and mental health. Such assessments can be meaningful to patients and helpful in routine mental health-care meetings.

Regularly assessing QoL during clinical meetings provides a framework for a structured and comprehensive evaluation of patients’ problems. This may facilitate patient involvement in selecting problems to be discussed and in taking action to tackle such problems.

We participated in the development and evaluation of intervention models based on these principles.

Their research evaluation showed that that routine QoL assessment and provision of feedback to patients and clinicians in itself do not improve outcomes. However, it can be an important part of more complex interventions. These interventions may involve a patient-centered approach, use of information technologies, and training of clinicians to a brief psychological intervention; they are effective in improving QoL and other patients’ outcomes.

In this chapter, we will describe the conceptual refinement over time of these interventions and their evidence base. The structural components of these interventions will be illustrated with quotes from patients and clinicians who have experienced them and a clinical vignette. We will then offer recommendations for further research in this field, within and beyond community mental health care.

Keywords

Quality of life Interventions Community mental health care 

References

  1. Bavelas J, De Jong P, Franklin C, et al. Solution focused therapy treatment manual for working with individuals (2nd version). Santa Fe: Solution Focused Brief Therapy Association; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Beitinger R, Kissling W, Hamann J. Trends and perspectives of shared decision-making in schizophrenia and related disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27:222–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Coulter A. Implementing shared decision making in the UK. London: Health Foundation; 2010. Retrieved at: http://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/ImplementingSharedDecisionMakingInTheUK.pdf.
  4. De Shazer S. Clues: investigating solutions in brief therapy. New York: Norton; 1988.Google Scholar
  5. Grant A, Townend M, Mulhern R, Short N. Cognitive behavioural therapy in mental health care. London: SAGE Publications; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77:219–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Levensky ER, Forcehimes A, O’Donohue WT, Beitz K. Motivational Interviewing: an evidence-based approach to counseling helps patients follow treatment recommendations. Am J Nurs. 2007;107:50–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. MacInnes D, Kinane C, Beer D, et al. Study to assess the effect of a structured communication approach on quality of life in secure mental health settings (Comquol): study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2013;14:257.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. McCabe RM, Priebe S. Focussing on quality of life in treatment. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2002;14:225–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McCabe R, Healey PG, Priebe S, Lavelle M, Dodwell D, Laugharne R, Snell A, Bremner S. Shared understanding in psychiatrist-patient communication: association with treatment adherence in schizophrenia. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:73–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Omer S, Golden E, Priebe S. Exploring the mechanisms of a patient-centred assessment with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) in the community treatment of patients with psychosis: a process evaluation within a cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148415.Google Scholar
  12. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiat. 1999;45:7–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Priebe S, McCabe R, Bullenkamp J, et al. Structured patient-clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare. Cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiat. 2007;191:420–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Priebe S, Watzke S, Hansson L, Burns T. Objective social outcomes index (SIX): a method to summarise objective indicators of social outcomes in mental health care. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;118:57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Priebe S, Reininghaus U, McCabe R, Burns T, Eklund M, Hansson L, Junghan U, Kallert T, van Nieuwenhuizen C, Ruggeri M, Slade M, Wang D. Factors influencing subjective quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a pooled analysis. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:251–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Priebe S, McCabe R, Junghan U, Kallert T, Ruggeri M, Slade M, Reininghaus U. Association between symptoms and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia: a pooled analysis of changes over time. Schizophr Res. 2011a;133:17–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Priebe S, Dimic S, Wildgrube C, Jankovic J, Cushing A, McCabe R. Good communication in psychiatry–a conceptual review. Eur Psychiatry. 2011b;26:403–7.Google Scholar
  18. Priebe S, Golden E, McCabe R, Reininghaus U. Patient-reported outcome data generated in a clinical intervention in community mental health care–psychometric properties. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:113.Google Scholar
  19. Priebe S, Kelley L, Golden EM, et al. The effectiveness of a patient-centred assessment with a solution focused approach (DIALOG+) for patients with psychosis – a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial in community care. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84:304–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Puschner B, Becker T, Mayer B, et al. Clinical decision making and outcome in the routine care of people with severe mental illness across Europe (CEDAR). Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016;25(1):69–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Slade M. Routine outcome assessment in mental health services. Psychol Med. 2002a;32:1339–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Slade M. What outcomes to measure in routine mental health services, and how to assess them: a systematic review. Aus New Zealand J Psychiat. 2002b;36:743–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slade M, McCrone P, Kuipers E, Leese M, Cahill S, Parabiaghi A, Priebe S, Thornicroft G. Use of standardised outcome measures in adult mental health services: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiat. 2006;18:330–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry(WHO Centre for Mental Health Service Development), Queen Mary University of London, East London NHS Foundation Trust, Newham Centre for Mental HealthLondonUK

Personalised recommendations