Advertisement

Designing and Implementing Mixed Approaches to Shadow Education Research: Experiences and Lessons in Hong Kong

  • Mark BrayEmail author
  • Ora Kwo
Chapter
Part of the CERC Studies in Comparative Education book series (CERC, volume 32)

Abstract

This chapter reports on dimensions of a research journey. The journey was a project entitled ‘Private Supplementary Tutoring: Scale, Nature and Implications for Secondary Schooling in Hong Kong’.

Keywords

Team Member Private Tutoring Mixed Approach Mainstream Schooling Student Questionnaire 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bray, Mark (2010): ‘Researching Shadow Education: Methodological Challenges and Directions’. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.11, No.1, pp.3‐13.Google Scholar
  2. Bray, Mark (2013): ‘Benefits and Tensions of Shadow Education: Comparative Perspectives on the Roles and Impact of Private Supplementary Tutoring in the Lives of Hong Kong Students’. Journal of International and Comparative Education, Vol.2, No.1, pp.18-30.Google Scholar
  3. Bray, Mark & Kobakhidze, Magda Nutsa (2015): ‘Evolving Ecosystems in Education: The Nature and Implications of Private Supplementary Tutoring in Hong Kong’. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, in press.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, Mark; Zhan, Shengli; Lykins, Chad; Wang, Dan & Kwo, Ora (2014): ‘Differentiated Demand for Private Supplementary Tutoring: Patterns and Implications in Hong Kong Secondary Education’. Economics of Education Re-view, Vol.38, No.1, pp.24-37.Google Scholar
  5. Creswell, John W. (2014): Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. della Porta, Donatella & Keating, Michael (eds.) (2008): Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, Burke & Christensen, Larry (2012): Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Jokić, Boris (ed.) (2013): Emerging from the Shadow: A Comparative Qualitative Exploration of Private Tutoring in Eurasia. Zagreb: Network of Education Policy Centers.Google Scholar
  9. Kwo, Ora & Bray, Mark (2014): Understanding the Nexus between Mainstream Schooling and Private Supplementary Tutoring: Patterns and Voices of Hong Kong Secondary Students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Vol.34, No.4, pp.403-416.Google Scholar
  10. Mullis, I.V.S.; Martin, M.O.; Smith, T.A.; Garden, R.A.; Gregory, K.D.; Gonzales, E.J.; Chrowstowski, S.D. & O’Connor, K.M. (2003); TIMSS Assessment Frameworks and Specifications 2003. Chestnut Hill: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar
  11. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2014): PISA 2012 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. Zhan, Shengli; Bray, Mark; Wang, Dan; Lykins, Chad & Kwo, Ora (2013): ‘The Effectiveness of Private Tutoring: Students’ Perceptions in Comparison with Mainstream Schooling in Hong Kong’. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp.495-509.Google Scholar
  13. Zhang, Wei & Bray, Mark (2013): ‘Researching Supplementary Education: Plans, Realities, and Lessons from Fieldwork in China’, in Aurini, Janice; Davies, Scott & Dierkes, Julian (eds.), Out of the Shadows: The Global Intensification of Supplementary Education. Bingley: Emerald, pp.67-94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations