Advertisement

A Mixed-Methods Study of Extra Lessons in Jamaica: Methodological Experiences and Reflections

  • Saran StewartEmail author
Chapter
  • 581 Downloads
Part of the CERC Studies in Comparative Education book series (CERC, volume 32)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the methodological decisions made in a study of extra lessons in Jamaica, and comments on choices and dilemmas during the research process. It begins with the research questions, and continues to the mixed-methods design. Subsequent sections focus on lessons learned in the instrument design, sampling, data collection, the stage of interface, disconfirming findings, and other methodological challenges.

Keywords

Private Tutoring Inclusive Pedagogy Mixed Method Research Qualitative Phase Education Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, David; Akiba, Motoko; LeTendre, Gerald & Wiseman, Alexander W. (2001): ‘Worldwide Shadow Education: Outside-school Learning, Institutional Quality of Schooling, and Cross‑national Mathematics Achievement’. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol.23, No.1, pp.1‑17.Google Scholar
  2. Bray, Mark (1999): The Shadow Education System: Private Tutoring and its Implications for Planners. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  3. Bray, Mark (2006): ‘Private Supplementary Tutoring: Comparative Perspectives on Patterns and Implications’. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, Vol.36, No.4, pp.515‑530.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, Mark (2009): Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring?. Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  5. Bray, Mark (2013): ‘Benefits and Tensions of Shadow Education: Comparative Perspectives on the Roles and Impact of Private Supplementary Tutoring in the Lives of Hong Kong Students’. Journal of International and Comparative Education, Vol.2, No.1, pp.18‑30.Google Scholar
  6. Brunton, Ronald (2000): ‘Extra-lessons in Trinidad and Tobago: Qualification, Inflation and Equality of Educational Opportunity’. Caribbean Curriculum, Vol.7, No.2, pp.1-17.Google Scholar
  7. Bryman, Alan (2006): ‘Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is it Done?’. Qualitative Research, Vol.6, No.1, pp.97-113.Google Scholar
  8. Creswell, John (2007): Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, John & Plano Clark, Vicki (2011): Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Creswell, John W.; Plano Clark, Vicki & Garret, Amanda L. (2008): ‘Methodological Issues in Conducting Mixed Methods Research Designs’, in Bergman, Manfred Max (ed.), Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. Los Angeles: Sage, pp.66-83.Google Scholar
  11. Dang, Hai‑Anh & Rogers, F. Halsey. (2008): How to Interpret the Growing Phenomenon of Private Tutoring: Human Capital Deepening, Inequality, or Waste of Resources? Policy Research Working Paper WPS 4530, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Fowler, Floyd (2009): Survey Research Methods. 4th edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Greene, Jennifer C.; Caracelli, Valerie J. & Graham, Wendy F. (1989): ‘Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed‑Method Evaluation Designs’. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol.11, No.3, pp.255‑274.Google Scholar
  14. Hodgkin, Suzanne (2008): ‘Telling it All: A Story of Women’s Social Capital using a Mixed Methods Approach’. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol.2, No.3, pp.296‑316.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, R. Burke & Turner, Lisa A. (2003): ‘Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Methods Research’, in Tashakkori, Abbas & Teddlie, Charles (eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.297‑320.Google Scholar
  16. Lochan, Samuel N. & Barrow, Dorian A. (2008): ‘Extra-lessons: A Comparison between “Different Sides of the Track” in Trinidad and Tobago’. Caribbean Curriculum, Vol.15, pp.45‑69.Google Scholar
  17. Miles, Matthew & Huberman, A. (1994): Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.; Johnson, R. Burke & Collins, Kathleen M. (2009): ‘A Call for Mixed Analysis: A Philosophical Framework for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative’. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, Vol.3, No.2, pp.114‑139.Google Scholar
  19. Spencer‑Rowe, Joan (2000): An Investigation of the Practice of Extra Lessons in Schools at the Primary Level of the Jamaican Education System: A Report. Kingston: Planning Institute of Jamaica/Ministry of Education and Culture.Google Scholar
  20. Stake, Robert E. (2005): ‘Qualitative Case Studies’, in Denzin, Norman, K. & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.443‑466.Google Scholar
  21. Stewart, Saran (2013): Everything in di Dark Muss Come to Light: A Postcolonial Examination of the Practice of Extra Lessons at the Secondary Level in Jamaica’s Education System. PhD Dissertation, University of Denver.Google Scholar
  22. Tuitt, Frank A. (2003): ‘Afterword: Realizing a More Inclusive Pedagogy’, in Howell, Annie & Tuitt, Frank (eds.), Race and Higher Education: Rethinking Pedagogy in Diverse College Classrooms Cambridge: Harvard Educational Review, pp.243‑268.Google Scholar
  23. Yin, Robert K. (2009): Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Yin, Robert K. (2012): Applications of Case Study Research, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Zhan, Shengli; Bray, Mark; Wang, Dan; Lykins, Chad & Kwo, Ora (2013): ‘The Effectiveness of Private Tutoring: Students’ Perceptions in Comparison with Mainstream Schooling in Hong Kong’. Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp.495‑509.Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, Yu (2011): The Determinants of National College Entrance Exam Performance in China – With an Analysis of Private Tutoring. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the West IndiesKingstonJamaica

Personalised recommendations