Abstract
In recent years, new computing technologies in architecture have led to the possibility of designing architecture with non-static qualities, which affords the architectural designer with a whole new opportunity space to explore. At the same time, this opportunity space challenges both the principles governing the design of architecture as well as the agency of and the methods at hand for architectural professionals since architecture is traditionally contained in a paradigm of permanence. This essay focuses on a sub-domain of non-static architecture, namely adaptive architecture. Through an investigation into contemporary architectural discourse supported by examples from practice, I frame a shift in attention from the architectural object alone to the act of inhabitation. Further, I argue that the act of inhabitation is a process of negotiation and exchange between the architectural object, the inhabitant and the environment. Consequently, I discuss four aspects of adaptivity in architecture, namely temporality, memory, learning and emergence as an organizing hierarchy, which form the basis for further unpacking adaptivity. Finally, in order to facilitate this further unpacking, and as a response to meet the challenges of designing with adaptivity in architecture, I propose a particular method specifically tailored for adaptive architectural design. The method, relational prototyping, is founded on the idea of inhabitation as an act. Relational prototyping adapts techniques from performance to construct a full-scale prototyping genre, which equips and capacitates the architectural professional with a means to explore and operationalize adaptive qualities of architecture such as temporality, memory, learning and emergence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A Paskian system refers to a cybernetic system. Gordon Pask was one of the early proponents of cybernetics, specifically contributing with the notion of second order cybernetics. Such systems include levels of feedback beyond achieving a goal and, therefore, also embed interactions from, e.g. human participants in the system (Negroponte 1975).
- 2.
In fact, the prototypes are indeed interpreted. Preliminary results reveal that the objects are typically assigned, e.g. the character of furniture, walls, doors, animals and people. However, the spectrum of interpretation indicates that there is, in fact, an open-endedness rather than reoccurring specific interpretations.
References
Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, Jacobson M, Fiksdahl-King I, Angel S (1977) A pattern language. Oxford University Press, New York
Allen S (2008) Practice: architecture, technique and representation. Routledge, New York
Ballantyne A (2007) Deleuze for architects. Routledge, London
Barba E, Savarese N (1995) The secret art of the performer. Routledge, London
Bateson G (1987) Steps to an ecology of mind. John Aronson Inc., London
Bonner JT (1988) The evolution of complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Braidotti R (2013) The posthuman. Polity Press, Cambridge
Brand S (1997) How buildings learn: what happens after they’re built. Weidenfeld Nicolson Illustrated, London
Bullivant L (2006) Responsive environments – architecture, art and design. V&A Contemporary, London
DeLanda M (2002) Deleuze and the use of genetic algorithm in architecture. In: Leach N (ed) Designing for a digital world. Wiley, London
Deleuze G, Guattari F (2004) A thousand plateaus. Continuum, London
Dolphijn R, van der Tuin I (2012) New materialism: interviews & cartographies. Open Humanities Press, Ann Arbor
Evans R (1997) Translations from drawings to building and other essays. Architectural Association, London
Fox M, Kemp M (2009) Interactive architecture. Princeton Architectural Press, New York
Goulthorpe M, Shpiner S, Allen CW (2003) Hyposurface. http://www.hyposurface.org/. Retrieved: 2 Mar 2015
Gropius W (1954) Eight steps toward a solid architecture. Reprinted in architecture culture. (1993) Ockman J (ed) Rizzoli, New York
Haque U (2007) The architectural relevance of Gordon Pask. In: Bullivant L (ed) 4DSocial: interactive design environments, architectural design No. 77. Wiley, London
Ingold T (2010) Bringing things to life: creative entanglements in a world of materials. NCRM working papers series. University of Aberdeen, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods
Kolarevic B (2009) Exploring architecture of change: ACADIA 09:Reform
Kolarevic B (2014) Outlook 2014. In: Kretzer M, Hovestadt L (eds) ALIVE. Advancements in adaptive architecture. Birkhäuser, Basel
Kronenburg R (2007) Flexible: architecture that responds to change. Laurence King, London
Lawrence E (ed) (2000) Henderson’s dictionary of biological terms. Prentice Hall, Edinburgh
Meyerhold V (1969) Meyerhold on theatre (Trans and ed. Edward Braun). Hill & Wang, New York
Moloney J (2011) Designing kinetics for architectural facades. State change. Routledge, New York
Negroponte N (1975) Soft architecture machines. MIT Press, Cambridge
Nouvel J (1987) Institut Arabe du Monde. Paris. http://www.jeannouvel.com/en/desktop/home/#/en/desktop/projet/paris-france-arab-world-institut1. Retrieved: 16 Feb 2015
Petersen K, Kristensen O, Søndergaard K (2013) Experiencing LED lighting: new form and experiential qualities, emerging in lighting systems using LED. http://adaptive.itu.dk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Experiencing-LED-lighting.pdf, 12-15-2014. Retrieved 14 Mar 2015
Plowright P (2014) Revealing architectural design. Methods, frameworks & tools. Routledge, London
Schechner R (2003) Performance theory. Routledge, London. Revised Edition
Schechner R (2006) Performance studies – an introduction, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York
Schmidt U (2007) Minimalismen Æstetik. Museum Tusculanums Forlag
Schnädelbach H (2010) Adaptive architecture – a conceptual framework. In: MediaCity: interaction of architecture, media and social phenomena
Simon H (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Søndergaard K, Petersen K (2011) Material evidence as staged experientiality. In: Beim A, Thomsen, MR (eds) The role of material evidence in architectural research. The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture, Design and Conservation
Stein G (2003) Paris France. Personal recollections. Peter Owen Publisher, London
Sterk T (2006) Responsive architecture: user-centered interactions within the hybridized model of control. In: Games and match II: on computer games, advanced geometries and digital technologies. Episode Publishers, Rotterdam
Terzidis K (2006) Algorithmic architecture. Architectural Press, Oxford
Thébert Y (1987) Private life and domestic architecture in Roman Africa, vol 1, A history of private life, 5 vols. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p 407
van Hinte A (ed) (2003) Smart architecture. 010 Publishers, Amsterdam
Zuk W, Clarke R (1970) Kinetic architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bolbroe, C. (2016). Mapping the Intangible: On Adaptivity and Relational Prototyping in Architectural Design. In: Dalton, N., Schnädelbach, H., Wiberg, M., Varoudis, T. (eds) Architecture and Interaction. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30028-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30028-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30026-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30028-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)