Advertisement

Enhancement of Direct Augmented Reality Object Selection by Gravity-Adapted Target Resizing

  • Daniela Markov-VetterEmail author
  • Vanja Zander
  • Joachim Latsch
  • Oliver Staadt
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 598)

Abstract

Direct object selection in an Augmented Reality environment that is coded outside of human body frame of reference is deteriorated under short-term altered gravity. As countermeasures we developed a gravity-adapted resizing technique based on the Hooke’s law that resulted in two techniques of target and interface deformation (compression, elongation). To prove the concept of this resizing approach we initially conducted two experiments under simulated hypergravity conditions. While during the first study hypergravity was induced by a long-arm human centrifuge, in the second study hypergravity was simulated by additional arm weightings that were balanced and attached to the participants’ pointing arm. We investigated the difference of the task performance with respect to the pointing frequency, response time, pointing speed and accuracy, when participants performed a visuomotor task under the resizing conditions compared to the unchanged condition. During the second study we additionally evaluated the speed-accuracy tradeoff of the resizing techniques according to Fitts’ law and the physiological workload by cardiac responses analyzing the heart rate variability. Both experiments showed that the online adaption of the present gravity load to targets’ size and distance influences the performance of direct AR direct pointing. The results revealed that the pointing performance benefits from elongation target deformation by increased target sizes and distances, while pointing towards compressed targets mostly decreases the physiological workload under increased gravity conditions.

Keywords

Augmented reality Interaction Direct pointing Usability 

References

  1. 1.
    Azuma, R.T.: A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleoperators Virt. Environ. 6(4), 355–385 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agan, M., Voisinet, L.A., Devereaux, A.: NASA’s Wireless Augmented Reality Prototype (WARP). In: Proceedings of AIP 1998, pp. 236–242 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scheid, F., Nitsch, A., König, H., Arguello, L., De Weerdt, D., Arndt, D., Rakers, S.: Operation of European SDTO at Col-CC. SpaceOps 2010 Conference (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clauser, C.E., McConville, J.T., Young, J.W.: Weight, volume, and center of mass of segments of the human body. AMRL Technical Report 69-70 (1969)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Department of Defense.: Design criteria standard, human engineering. Technical Report MIL-STD-1472FGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psychol. 47, 381–391 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guardiera, S., Schneider, S., Noppe, A., Strüder, H.K.: Motor performance and motor learning in sustained +3Gz acceleration. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 79(9), 852–859 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hartmann, K., Ali, K., Strothotte, T.: Floating labels: applying dynamic potential fields for label layout. In: Butz, A., Krüger, A., Olivier, P. (eds.) SG 2004. LNCS, vol. 3031, pp. 101–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ISO/DIS 9241-9.: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. International Standard, International Organization for Standardization (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kato, H., Billinghurst, M.: Marker Tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. In: Proceedings of IWAR 1999, pp. 85–94 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kohli, L., Whitton, M.C., Brooks, F.P.: Redirected touching: the effect of warping space on task performance. In: Proceedings of 3DUI 2012, pp. 105–112 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, N., Duh, H.B.L.: Cognitive issues in mobile augmented reality: an embodied perspective? In: Huang, T., Alem, L., Livingston, M. (eds.) Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environment, pp. 109–135. Springer Science + Business, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacKenzie, I.S.: Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7, 91–139 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markov-Vetter, D., Moll E., Staadt O.: Evaluation of 3D selection tasks in parabolic flight conditions: pointing task in augmented reality user interfaces. In: Proceedings of VRCAI 2012, pp. 287–293 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Markov-Vetter, D., Zander, V., Latsch, J., Staadt O.: The impact of altered gravitation on performance and workload of augmented reality hand-eye-coordination: inside vs. outside of human body frame of reference. In: Proceedings of JVRC 2013, pp. 65–72 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Markov-Vetter, D., Zander, V., Latsch, J., Staadt, O.: The influence of gravity-adapted target resizing on direct augmented reality pointing under simulated hypergravity. In: Proceedings of GRAPP 2015, pp. 401–411 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oehme, O., Schmidt, L., Luczak, H.: Comparison between the strain indicator HRV of a head based virtual retinal display and LC-mounted displays for augmented reality. In: Proceedings of WWDU 2002, pp. 387–389 (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pick, S., Hentschel, B., Tedjo-Palczynski, I., Wolter, M., Kuhlen, T.: Automated positioning of annotations in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of JVRC 2010, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rohs, M., Oulasvirta, A., Suomalainen, T.: Interaction with magic lenses: real-world validation of a Fitts’ Law model. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 2725–2728 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scheid, F., Nitsch, A., König, H., Arguello, L., De Weerdt, D., Arndt, D., Rakers, S.: Operation of European (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    SDTO at Col-CC. SpaceOps 2010 ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart Rate Variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 1996 (93): 1043–1065 / Eur. Heart J. 17(3), 354–381 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Markov-Vetter
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Vanja Zander
    • 2
  • Joachim Latsch
    • 2
  • Oliver Staadt
    • 3
  1. 1.German Aerospace Center (DLR)Institute of Aerospace MedicineCologneGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Cardiology and Sports MedicineGerman Sport University CologneCologneGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations