Abstract
The contents of this book rely upon primary data collected among human subjects, and are therefore subject to national regulations requiring prior approval from an ethical review committee (or Institutional Review Board, in the USA). Seeking ethical approval for research in the sensitive and politically charged field of HIV research can be a trying process for a research team. The design and conduct of research fieldwork frequently gives rise to difficult ethical dilemmas. Children and families affected by HIV may be vulnerable to harmful outcomes including stigma, discrimination, abuse and exploitation; and may have impaired access to power and resources. We acknowledge the importance of the input of these vulnerable individuals and families, so that their needs are understood and appropriate services and programs can be developed, ultimately in order to bring quality of life improvements. Yet their vulnerable circumstances demand that a researcher seeking their participation in a data collection activity must exercise special care and take extra precautions to ensure their protection. In this chapter, we highlight some constructive advice for study design and conduct aimed at enhancing the ethical conduct of research among children and families affected by HIV, based upon recurrent themes that we have observed from our experience of conducting ethical reviews. We conclude that it is feasible to conduct ethically sound and high quality research among children and families affected by HIV, and that these values extend far beyond our field of HIV research to researchers in other fields working among vulnerable children and families, including malaria and child survival.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Similar precautions also apply when working with vulnerable and stigmatized adult populations, such as sex workers or men who have sex with men – but the power imbalance is especially pronounced when working among children.
- 2.
Some researchers have alleged that the principles of the Belmont Report, designed with biomedical research studies in mind, do not adequately address the circumstances of public health research, where research goals extend from the individual to the population level. Several alternatives have been proposed for frameworks of public health ethics [e.g. (Soskolne 1991; Kass 2001; Callahan and Jennings 2002; Bernheim 2003; Baum et al. 2007).
- 3.
Or comparison arm, for quasi-experimental research.
References
Baum, N. M., Gollust, S. E., Goold, S. D., & Jacobson, P. D. (2007). Looking ahead: Addressing ethical challenges in public health practice. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 35(4), 657–667. 513.
Bernheim, R. G. (2003). Public health ethics: The voices of practitioners. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(S4), 104–109.
Brown, L., Thurman, T. R., Rice, J., Boris, N. W., Ntaganira, J., Nyirazinyoye, L., … Snider, L. (2009). Impact of a mentoring program on psychosocial wellbeing of youth in Rwanda: Results of a quasi-experimental study. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 4(4), 288–299.
Callahan, D., & Jennings, B. (2002). Ethics and public health: Forging a strong relationship. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 169–176.
Cook, T., & Hess, E. (2007). What the camera sees and from whose perspective fun: Methodologies for engaging children in enlightening adults. Childhood, 14(1), 29–45.
Del Valle, A. (2013). Addressing violence against girls and adolescents through participatory mapping. UNFPA Webinar Series for the Adolescent Girls Initiative. Population Council.
Kass, N. E. (2001). An ethics framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1776–1782.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1978). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Schenk, K. D., & Williamson, J. (2005). Ethical approaches to gathering information from children and adolescents in international settings: Guidelines and resources. Washington, DC: USAID, Population Council, Family Health International.
Soskolne, C. L. (1991). Ethical decision-making in epidemiology: The case study approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44(Supplement 1), 125–130.
United Nations General Assembly. (1989). Convention on the Rights rights of the child. New York: United Nations.
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Final rule. Federal Register, 56(117), 28003–28018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schenk, K.D., RamaRao, S. (2016). Ethical Considerations of Conducting Research among Children and Young People Affected by HIV: A View from an Ethics Review Board. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Children and Young People Living with HIV/AIDS. Cross-Cultural Research in Health, Illness and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29936-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29936-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29934-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29936-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)