Advertisement

Geometrical Modelling of Tubular and Flat Braids Within the Jamming Limits—Verification and Limitations

  • Yordan KyosevEmail author
  • Alena Cordes
Chapter

Abstract

Designing and developing braids requires specific knowledge about the structure, properties of the yarn, settings of the machine and other parameters. There are several works in the scientific literature that provide a large number of equations to calculate unknown braid parameters if some of the other values are known. Most of these works are useful for a scientific approach, but are often not practical for the everyday use in an industrial workspace environment. It would simply take too much time and effort for an engineer in a braiding company, to solve integrals in order to find the mass of a braid or another parameter. This paper presents an evaluation of the software TexMind Braider, which implements the above-mentioned scientific equations and performs several calculations automatically for the user. The benchmark has the goal to check and identify possible applications of this software, to find errors in the implementation or in the theories behind the equations and to state the general limitations of using geometrical models for modelling. The comparison will include a tubular braid with a monofilament yarn, a tubular braid with a multifilament yarn and a flat braid with a monofilament yarn.

Keywords

Geometrical Model Circular Cross Section Tensile Testing Machine Yarn Diameter Multifilament Yarn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Brunnschweiler, 5—The structure and tensile properties of braids. J. Text. Inst. Trans. 45(1), T55 (1954). doi: 10.1080/19447025408662631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Du Gw, P. Popper, Analysis of a circular braiding process for complex shapes. J. Text. Inst. 85(3), 316–337 (1994). doi: 10.1080/00405009408631277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.H. Hopper, J. Wallace Grant, P. Popper, Mechanics of a hybrid circular braid with an elastic core. Text. Res. J. 65(12), 709–722 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    F.K. Ko, C.M. Pastore, A.A. Head, Handbook of industrial braiding (Atkins &Peirce, 1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y.K. Kyosev (2012) TexMind Braider, Mönchengladbach, www.texmind.com
  6. 6.
    Y.K. Kyosev, Generalized geometric modelling of tubular and flat braided structures with arbitrary floating length and multiple filaments. Text. Res. J. (2015) (accepted)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y.K. Kyosev, M. Aurich, Investigations about the braiding angle and the cover factor of the braided fabrics using Image Processing and Symbolic Math Toolbox of Matlab, in Advances in Braiding Technology: Spezialized Techniques and Applications, ed. by Y.K. Kyosev (Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. McConnel, P. Popper, Complex shaped braided structures (1988) (4719837)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Popper, Braiding, in Handbook of Composite Reinforcements, ed. by S.M. Lee (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 1992), pp. 24–40Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.E. Yuksekkaya, S. Adanur, Analysis of Polymeric braided tubular structures intended for medical applications. Text. Res. J. 79(2), 99–109 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hochschule Niederrhein—University of Applied SciencesMonchengladbachGermany

Personalised recommendations