Skip to main content

Theory Choice in Chemistry: Attitudes to Computer Modelling in Chemistry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theory Choice in the History of Chemical Practices

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science ((BRIESFHISTCHEM))

  • 352 Accesses

Abstract

Computational modelling has grown over the last 40 years into a widely applied methodology in the scientific community. The uptake in the chemistry, as in other sciences, has not always been smooth, although the movement gains momentum as increasing computer power correspondingly increases the complexity of computer simulations of chemical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Born-Oppenheimer approximation has some limitations in accurately modelling chemical systems, for example where the ground and excited state are energetically close, or where the nature of bonding transitions between ionic and covalent. For further discussion see [5].

  2. 2.

    For further details on computer simulation methods and the approximations therein see [5].

  3. 3.

    Experiments draw from and feed back into theory. Simulations differ in this regard, as the theory into which they feed back is that of simulation rather than theory of chemistry.

  4. 4.

    This is particularly problematic: given that if a simulated system fortuitously accords with data from the real world given certain parameters, it could be from a cancellation of errors, chemists using such a simulation to predict how a system would behave if a parameter were changed have to trust that the model will also recreate these variations in the system accurately. There is often no way to check.

References

  1. Schelct MF (1997) Historical Overview of Molecular Modelling. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  2. Catlow CRA (2005) Computer modelling in materials chemistry. Pure Appl Chem 77:1345–1348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cramer CJ (2002) Essentials of Computational Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hartree DJ (1928) The wave mechanics of an atom with a non-coulomb central field. Part I. Theory and methods. Math Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 24(1):89–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen F (1999) Introduction to Computational Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parr RG (1983) Density functional theory. Annu Rev Phys Chem 34:631–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gross EKU, Dreizler RM (1995) Density Functional Theory. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohn W, Sham LJ (1965) Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys Rev 140:A1133–A1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hehre WJ (2003) A guide to molecular mechanics and quantum chemical calculations. Wavefunction, Inc, Irvine CA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woodley SM, Catlow CRA (2011) High-performance computing in the chemistry and physics of materials. Proc Roy Soc A 467:1880–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richon AB (2001) A scrolling history of computational chemistry. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280934406 (Rretrieved 10 March 2016)

  12. Johnson Matthey, Research and development (2012a) http://www.matthey.com/innovation/innovation_in_action/accurate-modelling-advanced-products (Retrieved 30 December 2012)

  13. Johnson Matthey, Research and development (2012b) http://www.matthey.com/investor/reports (Retrieved 10 March 2016)

  14. Schelct MF (1997) Historical Overview of Molecular Modelling. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smith CA (1994) Problem-based learning. Biochem Educ 22(3):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chong DP (1995) Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods Part 1. World Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horgan J (1993) The death of proof. Sci Am 269(4):92–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Winsberg E (2009) Computer simulation and the philosophy of science. Philos. Compass 4(5):835–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frigg R, Reiss J (2009) The philosophy of simulation: hot new issues or same old stew? Synthese 169:593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmid A (2005) What is the truth of simulation. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 8(4):5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boisvert RF, Cools R, Einarsson B (2005) Assessment of accuracy and reliability in accuracy and reliability in scientific computing. Soc Ind Appl Math

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan MS, Morrison M (1999) Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker W (2008) Computer simulation through an error-statistical lens. Synthese 163(3):371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Austen KF, White TOH, Marmier A, Parker SC, Artacho E, Dove MT (2008) Electrostatic versus polarisation effects in the adsorption of aromatic molecules of varied polarity on an insulating hydrophobic surface. J Phys: Condens Matter 20:035215

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winsberg E (2003) Simulated experiments: methodology for a virtual world. Philos Sci 70:105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Winsberg E (2010) Science in the Age of Computer Simulation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Hendry RF (2012) Reduction, emergence and physicalism. In: Woody AI, Hendry RF, Needham P (eds) Philosophy of Chemistry. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, vol 6. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 367–386

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dirac PAM (1929) The quantum mechanics of many-electron systems. Proc Roy Soc London A123:714–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scerri E (1997) Has the periodic table been successfully axiomatised? Erkenntnis 47:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kat F. Austen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Austen, K.F. (2016). Theory Choice in Chemistry: Attitudes to Computer Modelling in Chemistry. In: Tobin, E., Ambrosio, C. (eds) Theory Choice in the History of Chemical Practices. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29893-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics