Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Surgical Decision Making pp 59–79Cite as

The Decision-Making Process in Sepsis and Septic Shock

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1032 Accesses

Abstract

Despite dedicated attention and research, sepsis continues to be problematic in surgical patients. Sepsis and septic shock are ten times more frequent and have a higher associated mortality in surgical patients compared with perioperative myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. When septic shock occurs in surgical patients, it has an associated mortality of 39 % in emergent cases and 30 % in elective cases. Recent evidence-based advancement in critical care practices have led to a decrease in the case fatality rate for severe sepsis. These include the implementation of a screening program for early sepsis identification, prompt administration of antimicrobials, and obtaining surgical source control. Particularly in surgical patients, using Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria to screen for sepsis has proven impractical and insensitive; screening programs designed specifically for surgical patients should be used instead. While the individual components of early goal-directed therapy have been recently disputed, early recognition remains paramount in importance for improving survival from sepsis and septic shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lagu T, et al. Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:754–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall MJ, Williams SN, DeFrances CJ, Golosinskiy A. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;(62):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moore LJ, et al. Sepsis in general surgery: the 2005–2007 national surgical quality improvement program perspective. Arch Surg. 2010;145:695–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Angus DC, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore LJ, Moore FA, Jones SL, Xu J, Bass BL. Sepsis in general surgery: a deadly complication. Am J Surg. 2009;198:868–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dombrovskiy VY, Martin AA, Sunderram J, Paz HL. Facing the challenge: decreasing case fatality rates in severe sepsis despite increasing hospitalizations. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2555–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Balk RA, Bone RC. The septic syndrome. Definition and clinical implications. Crit Care Clin. 1989;5:1–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864–874.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Levy MM, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rivers E, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robson W, Beavis S, Spittle N. An audit of ward nurses’ knowledge of sepsis. Nurs Crit Care. 2007;12:86–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Assunção M, et al. Survey on physicians’ knowledge of sepsis: do they recognize it promptly? J Crit Care. 2010;25:545–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar A, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dellinger RP, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levy MM, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:222–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai NA, Kruger P. The predictive ability of a weighted systemic inflammatory response syndrome score for microbiologically confirmed infection in hospitalised patients with suspected sepsis. Crit Care Resusc J Australas Acad Crit Care Med. 2011;13:146–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Churpek MM, Zadravecz FJ, Winslow C, Howell M, Edelson DP. Incidence and prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunctions in ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(8):958–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore LJ, et al. Validation of a screening tool for the early identification of sepsis. J Trauma. 2009;66:1539–46; discussion 1546–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore L, et al. 8: Simple, reliable sepsis screening tool improves mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:A1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286:700–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guerin L, Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: from static to dynamic indicators. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2013;27:177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Teboul J-L, Monnet X. Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:334–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul J-L. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Grady NP, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51:1–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lins RL, et al. Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: results of a randomized clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:512–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bendjelid K, Romand J-A. Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:352–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Varpula M, Tallgren M, Saukkonen K, Voipio-Pulkki L-M, Pettilä V. Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:1066–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Annane D, et al. Effects of fluid resuscitation with colloids vs crystalloids on mortality in critically ill patients presenting with hypovolemic shock: the CRISTAL randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310:1809–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guidet B, et al. Assessment of hemodynamic efficacy and safety of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. 0.9% NaCl fluid replacement in patients with severe sepsis: the CRYSTMAS study. Crit Care. 2012;16:R94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Finfer S, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2247–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Caironi P, et al. Albumin replacement in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1412–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Early Albumin Resuscitation During Septic Shock— Full Text View—ClinicalTrials.gov. (n.d.). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00327704. Accessed 7 Mar 2016.

  33. Myburgh JA, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1901–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mutter TC, Ruth CA, Dart AB. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD007594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Havel C, Arrich J, Losert H, Gamper G, Müllner M, Herkner H. Vasopressors for hypotensive shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;5, CD003709. 10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub3.

  36. Oba Y, Lone NA. Mortality benefit of vasopressor and inotropic agents in septic shock: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care. 2014;29:706–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Holmes CL, Walley KR, Chittock DR, Lehman T, Russell JA. The effects of vasopressin on hemodynamics and renal function in severe septic shock: a case series. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27:1416–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fink MP. Cytopathic hypoxia. Is oxygen use impaired in sepsis as a result of an acquired intrinsic derangement in cellular respiration? Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:165–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parker MM, et al. Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shock. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100:483–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jardin F, Brun-Ney D, Auvert B, Beauchet A, Bourdarias JP. Sepsis-related cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:1055–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Turner KL, et al. Identification of cardiac dysfunction in sepsis with B-type natriuretic peptide. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:139–46; discussion 146–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Toma A, Stone A, Green RS, Gray S. Steroids for patients in septic shock: the results of the CORTICUS trial. CJEM. 2011;13:273–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Groeneveld ABJ, Molenaar N, Beishuizen B. Should we abandon corticosteroids during septic shock? No. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:384–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marik PE, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1937–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Annane D, et al. Diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency in severe sepsis and septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174:1319–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sprung CL, et al. Hydrocortisone therapy for patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:111–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Vinclair M, et al. Duration of adrenal inhibition following a single dose of etomidate in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:714–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Alday NJ, et al. Effects of etomidate on vasopressor use in patients with sepsis or severe sepsis: a propensity-matched analysis. J Crit Care. 2014;29:517–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bruder EA, Ball IM, Ridi S, Pickett W, Hohl C. Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chan CM, Mitchell AL, Shorr AF. Etomidate is associated with mortality and adrenal insufficiency in sepsis: a meta-analysis*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2945–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Annane D, et al. Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock. JAMA. 2002;288:862–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Annane D, Bellissant E, Bollaert P, et al. Corticosteroids in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. 2009;301:2362–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sligl WI, Milner DA, Sundar S, Mphatswe W, Majumdar SR. Safety and efficacy of corticosteroids for the treatment of septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:93–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Blot F, et al. Earlier positivity of central-venous- versus peripheral-blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:105–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Blot F, et al. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet. 1999;354:1071–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cook D, et al. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1417–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vincent J-L, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:344–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar A, et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest. 2009;136:1237–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fenollar F, Raoult D. Molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections caused by non-cultivable bacteria. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30 Suppl 1:S7–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Scerbo MH, Kaplan HB, Dua A, Litwin DB, Ambrose CG, Moore LJ, Murray CK, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Beyond blood culture and gram stain analysis: a review of molecular techniques for the early detection of bacteremia in surgical patients. Surg Infect. 2016. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.099.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ferrer R, et al. Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1749–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kollef MH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ. Inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections: a risk factor for hospital mortality among critically ill patients. Chest. 1999;115:462–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Fitousis K, Moore LJ, Hall J, Moore FA, Pass S. Evaluation of empiric antibiotic use in surgical sepsis. Am J Surg. 2010;200:776–82; discussion 782.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Gozal D, Ziser A, Shupak A, Ariel A, Melamed Y. Necrotizing fasciitis. Arch Surg. 1986;121:233–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Brook I, Frazier EH. Clinical and microbiological features of necrotizing fasciitis. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2382–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Monaghan SF, Anjaria D, Mohr A, Livingston DH. Necrotizing fasciitis and sepsis caused by Aeromonas hydrophila after crush injury of the lower extremity. Surg Infect. 2008;9:459–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hsu J-C, et al. Necrotizing fasciitis and sepsis caused by Vibrio vulnificus and Klebsiella pneumoniae in diabetic patients. Biomed J. 2015;38:136–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kuo Y-L, Shieh S-J, Chiu H-Y, Lee J-W. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Vibrio vulnificus: epidemiology, clinical findings, treatment and prevention. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26:785–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Young LM, Price CS. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus emerging as an important cause of necrotizing fasciitis. Surg Infect. 2008;9:469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Dellinger EP. Severe necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Multiple disease entities requiring a common approach. JAMA. 1981;246:1717–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wong C-H, Khin L-W, Heng K-S, Tan K-C, Low C-O. The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:1535–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surgical site infection (SSI) event. (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Cué JI, Cryer HG, Miller FB, Richardson JD, Polk HC. Packing and planned reexploration for hepatic and retroperitoneal hemorrhage: critical refinements of a useful technique. J Trauma. 1990;30:1007–11; discussion 1011–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rotondo MF, et al. ‘Damage control’: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:375–82; discussion 382–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Burch JM, et al. Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients. Ann Surg. 1992;215:476–83; discussion 483–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Aoki N, et al. Predictive model for survival at the conclusion of a damage control laparotomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:540–4; discussion 544–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Waibel BH, Rotondo MF. Damage control for intra-abdominal sepsis. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92:243–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Diaz JJ, et al. The management of the open abdomen in trauma and emergency general surgery: part 1-damage control. J Trauma. 2010;68:1425–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Offner PJ, et al. Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma. Arch Surg. 2001;136:676–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Malbrain MLNG, et al. Results from the international conference of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. I. definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1722–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Bernard GR, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Martí-Carvajal A, Salanti G, Cardona AF. Human recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1, CD004388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004388.pub3.

  83. Ranieri VM, et al. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2055–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kelm DJ, et al. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock. 2015;43:68–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Yealy DM, Kellum JA. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1683–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Cabrera JL, Pinsky MR. Management of septic shock: a protocol-less approach. Crit Care. 2015;19:260.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. ARISE Investigators, et al. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Mouncey PR, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1301–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhang L, Zhu G, Han L, Fu P. Early goal-directed therapy in the management of severe sepsis or septic shock in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Med. 2015;13:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

There are no identifiable conflicts of interests to report.

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.331, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Michelle H. Scerbo M.D. & Laura J. Moore M.D.

  2. Texas Trauma Institute, Memorial Hermann Hospital, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.292, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Laura J. Moore M.D.

Authors
  1. Michelle H. Scerbo M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura J. Moore M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura J. Moore M.D. .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scerbo, M.H., Moore, L.J. (2016). The Decision-Making Process in Sepsis and Septic Shock. In: Surgical Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29822-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29824-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation