Advertisement

Surgical Decision-Making Process and Definitive Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

  • Rifat Latifi
  • Ruben PeraltaEmail author
  • John A. Stroster
Chapter

Abstract

With advances in both abdominal surgery and the management of abdominal catastrophes, major abdominal wall defects have become a significant surgical disease, and the number of complex abdominal wall reconstructions has increased dramatically. However, the management of these patients has brought up a new dilemma, which is the question of how to actually repair these major defects. Such cases require extensive surgical knowledge of the physiology and anatomy of the patient, as well as the overall disease process. While one’s surgical skills and expertise are crucial when dealing with major abdominal wall defects, there are still a number of issues that are difficult to address, and so appropriate surgical decisions are important to ensure optimal outcomes. Furthermore, there is a need for a structured and logical management approach that is well understood by the patient, their family, as well as the team caring for them. In this chapter, we will specifically address this decision-making process across the various stages of reconstruction for complex abdominal wall defects.

Keywords

Open abdomen Complex abdominal wall defect Abdominal closure Abdominal wall reconstruction Lateral component separation techniques 

Notes

Acknowledgements

There are no identifiable conflicts of interests to report.

The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in the chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Higa G, Latifi R. A difficult abdomen: clinical course-based management. In: Surgery of complex abdominal wall defects. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. p. 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Visschers RG et al. Guided treatment improves outcome of patients with enterocutaneous fistulas. World J Surg. 2012;36(10):2341–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Visschers R et al. Health‐related quality of life in patients treated for enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg. 2008;95(10):1280–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Latifi R, Peralta R, Al Thani H. Abdominal wall reconstruction in patients with an open abdomen and enterocutaneous fistulas: a nine-step treatment strategy. In: Surgery of complex abdominal wall defects. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013. p. 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rohrich RJ et al. An algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):202–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sukkar SM et al. Challenging abdominal wall defects. Am J Surg. 2001;181(2):115–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lowe JB. Updated algorithm for abdominal wall reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2006;33(2):225–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynch AC et al. Clinical outcome and factors predictive of recurrence after enterocutaneous fistula surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):825.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Owen RM et al. Definitive surgical treatment of enterocutaneous fistula: outcomes of a 23-year experience. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):118–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brenner M et al. Risk factors for recurrence after repair of enterocutaneous fistula. Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):500–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leppäniemi A, Tukiainen E. Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(1):14–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albanese A. Eventracion mediana xifoumbilical gigante: metodo para su tratamiento. Rev Asoc Med Argent. 1951;65(709–710):376–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(3):519–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Vries Reilingh TS et al. Repair of giant midline abdominal wall hernias: “components separation technique” versus prosthetic repair. World J Surg. 2007;31(4):756–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diaz Jr JJ et al. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma: a review of the management of the open abdomen—part 2 “management of the open abdomen”. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2011;71(2):502–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Latifi R, Turégano F. Current management of enterocutaneous fistulas. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2011;37(3):207–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leppäniemi A. The hostile abdomen—a systematic approach to a complex problem. Scand J Surg. 2008;97(3):218–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vargo D. Component separation in the management of the difficult abdominal wall. Am J Surg. 2004;188(6):633–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fabian TC et al. Planned ventral hernia. Staged management for acute abdominal wall defects. Ann Surg. 1994;219(6):643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kushimoto S et al. Usefulness of the bilateral anterior rectus abdominis sheath turnover flap method for early fascial closure in patients requiring open abdominal management. World J Surg. 2007;31(1):2–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sailes FC et al. Synthetic and biological mesh in component separation: a 10-year single institution review. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):696–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A et al. Components-separation technique for closure of transverse non-midline abdominal wall incisional hernia. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(2):264–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harth KC, Rosen MJ. Endoscopic versus open component separation in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2010;199(3):342–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    den Hartog, D, et al. Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD006438.
  25. 25.
    Muramatsu K, Ihara K, Taguchi T. Selection of myocutaneous flaps for reconstruction following oncologic resection of sarcoma. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(3):307–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Servant JM et al. Reconstruction of large thoracoabdominal defects using two-stage free tissue transfers and prosthetic materials. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(4):360–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Erni D, Harder Y. The dissection of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap with complete preservation of the anterior rectus sheath. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(4):395–400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fulda GJ, Khan SU, Zabel DD. Special issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19(1):91–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arnez Z et al. Breast reconstruction using the free superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(4):276–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wei CY et al. The versatility of free rectus femoris muscle flap: an alternative flap. Microsurgery. 1995;16(10):698–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hill HL, Nahai F, Vasconez LO. The tensor fascia lata myocutaneous free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;61(4):517–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nahai F, Hill LH, Hester RT. Experiences with the tensor fascia lata flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(6):788–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wong C-H et al. Reconstruction of complex abdominal wall defects with free flaps: indications and clinical outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):500–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tukiainen E, Leppäniemi A. Reconstruction of extensive abdominal wall defects with microvascular tensor fasciae latae flap. Br J Surg. 2011;98(6):880–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Björck M et al. Classification—important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg. 2009;33(6):1154–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Richmond B et al. Component separation with porcine acellular dermal reinforcement is superior to traditional bridged mesh repairs in the open repair of significant midline ventral hernia defects. Am Surg. 2014;80(8):725–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cobb WS et al. Open retromuscular mesh repair of complex incisional hernia: predictors of wound events and recurrence. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):606–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Petro CC et al. Risk factors for wound morbidity after open retromuscular (sublay) hernia repair. Surgery. 2015;158(6):1658–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rifat Latifi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ruben Peralta
    • 3
    Email author
  • John A. Stroster
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryWestchester Medical Center, New York Medical CollegeValhallaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma SurgeryHamad General Hospital and Hamad Medical CorporationDohaQatar
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryBanner University Medical CenterTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations