The Challenge of Increasing Safe Response of Antivirus Software Users

  • Vlasta StavovaEmail author
  • Vashek Matyas
  • Kamil Malinka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9548)


While antivirus software is an essential part of nearly every computer, users often ignore its warnings and they are often unable to make a safe response when interacting with antivirus software. The aim of our study was to find working connections to increase a number of mobile device users who select a premium license with more security features over a free license with a limited level of security. We cooperated with the antivirus company ESET and more than fourteen thousand users participated in first phase of our experiment. We tested two new types of a user dialog on the Android platform. The first user dialog was designed with a text change and the other with a new button “Ask later”. As a result, we found out that the text change increased the number of premium license purchases by 66 % in the first phase of our experiment, the version with the “Ask later” button increased this number by 25 % in the same period.


Text Change Zero Variant Android Platform Antivirus Software User Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Sunshine, J., Egelman, S., Almuhimedi, H., Atri, N., Cranor, L.F.: Crying wolf: an empirical study of ssl warning effectiveness. In: USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 399–416 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sotirakopoulos, A., Hawkey, K., Beznosov, K.: On the challenges in usable security lab studies: lessons learned from replicating a study on ssl warnings. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, p. 3. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amer, T., Maris, J.-M.B.: Signal words and signal icons in application control and information technology exception messages-hazard matching and habituation effects”. J. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 1–25 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bravo-Lillo, C., Cranor, L.F., Downs, J., Komanduri, S., Sleeper, M.: Improving computer security dialogs. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 18–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wogalter, M.S., Desaulniers, D.R., Brelsford, J.W.: Consumer products: how are the hazards perceived? In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 615–619 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wogalter, M.: Handbook of Warnings. Human Factors and Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis, London (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bravo-Lillo, C., Komanduri, S., Cranor, L.F., Reeder, R.W., Sleeper, M., Downs, J., Schechter, S.: Your attention please: designing security-decision uis to make genuine risks harder to ignore. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS 2013, pp. 6:1–6:12. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wogalter, M.S., Conzola, V.C., Smith-Jackson, T.L.: Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. Appl. Ergon. 33, 219–230 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kline, P.B., Braun, C.C., Peterson, N., Silver, N.C.: The impact of color on warnings research. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 37, no. 14, pp. 940–944 (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tan, J., Nguyen, K., Theodorides, M., Negrón-Arroyo, H., Thompson, C., Egelman, S., Wagner, D.: The effect of developer-specified explanations for permission requests on smartphone user behavior. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014, pp. 91–100. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wiebe, E.N., Shaver, E.F., Wogalter, M.S.: People’s beliefs about the internet: surveying the positive and negative aspects. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting vol. 45, no. 15, pp. 1186–1190 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nielsen, J.: How users read on the web (1997). Accessed 1 December 2014
  13. 13.
    Nielsen, J.: F-shaped pattern for reading web content (2006). Accessed 1 December 2014
  14. 14.
    Cialdini, R.: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ariely, D.: Predictably Irrational, Revised and Expanded Edition: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Harper Perennial/Harper Collins, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilbert, D.T., Ebert, J.E.: Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82(4), 503 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corder, G., Foreman, D.: Nonparametric Statistics: A Step-by-Step Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRoCS Laboratory, Faculty of InformaticsMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations