Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methods of Ascertainment of Personal Damage in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personal Injury and Damage Ascertainment under Civil Law

  • 525 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter illustrates the historical, judicial, and juridical framework of personal injury assessment and compensation in Turkey, describing the expert’s qualification and competences and detailing the ascertainment methodology and criteria of evaluation utilized for identifying, describing, and estimating any personal injury, its temporary and permanent consequences, and the causal value/link between the event and the injury and between the injury and the impairment/disability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. İnce H (2003) Adli Tıp Açısından İş Kazalarının Değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni 8(3):82–87

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yardım N, Çipil Z, Vardar C, Mollahaliloğlu S, Hastalıkları İKVM (2007) Türkiye İş Kazaları Ve Meslek Hastalıkları: 2000-2005 Yılları Ölüm Hızları. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 34(4):264–271

    Google Scholar 

  3. www.ssk.gov.tr. Accessed 2 Feb 2009

  4. 28 Nisan Dünya İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Günü “Türkiye Dosyası” 2007, www.sosyalhaklar.org. Accessed 2 Feb 2009

  5. Küçük Şantiyelerde İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği. http://insaat.calisma.gov.tr. Accessed 2 Feb 2009

  6. WHO (1981) Disability prevention and rehabilitation. Report of the WHO Expert Committee on Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation. Technical report series 668, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dünya Sağlık Raporu 1998, 21. Yüzyılda yaşam, Herkes için bir vizyon, DSÖ, Genevre 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rondinelli R, Genovese E, Katz RT, Mayer TG, Mueller K, Ranavaya M, Brigham CR (2008) Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 6th edn. AMA, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kabakçı M. Sosyal Sigortalar Kurumu Başkanlığı’nın İş Kazaları ve Meslek Hastalıklarındaki Uygulamaları. MESKA 2004 Kongre Kitabı, 26–30 Nisan 2004, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  10. İnce H (2004) Maluliyet Oranının Zamanla Değişimi. Adli Tıp Bülteni 9(1):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  11. İnce H (2005) İş Kazaları ve Meslek hastalıkları Sonucunda Ortaya Çıkan Meslekte Kazanma Gücü Azalma Oranlarının Hesaplanma Yöntemlerinin Farklı Sosyal Güvence Kurumlarına Göre Araştırılması ve Standardizasyonu. İ.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bilim Doktora Tezi

    Google Scholar 

  12. İnce H, İnce N, Tüzün B (2000) İş kazaları ve Çalışma Gücü Kayıplarının Türkiye deki Yasal Düzenlemeleri. Adli Tıp Bülteni 5(1):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Birgen N, Okudan M, İnanıcı MA, Okyay M (1999) İş Kazasına bağlı olgularda maluliyet oranı hesaplanması: Adli tıp açısından değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni 4(3):101–108

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aşıcıoğlu F, Okudan M, Umut S, Suyugül N (1994) Göze yönelik travmalarda maluliyet olgularının değerlendirilmesi. Ulusal Adli Tıp Kongresi (1–4 Kasım/İstanbul) Kongre Kitabı, İstanbul, pp. 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forst LS, Hryhorczuk D, Jaros M (1999) A state trauma registry as a tool for occupational injury surveillance. J Occup Environ Med 41(6):514–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Güven E (1986) Adli Tıp Açısından Maluliyetin Değerlendirilmesi (Uzmanlık Tezi) T.C. Adalet Bakanlığı Adli Tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christoffel KK (1993) Child and Adolescent Injury in the United States: How occupational injuries fit in. Am J Ind Med 24(3):301–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hunting KL, Nessel-Stephens L, Sanford SM, Shesser R, Welch LS (1994) Surveillance of construction worker injuries through an urban emergency department. J Occup Med 36(3):356–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sahli BP, Armstrong CW (1992) Confined space fatalities in Virginia. J Occup Med 34(9):910–917

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suruda A, Floccare D, Smith G (1991) İnjuries from tire and Wheel explosions during servicing. Ann Emerg Med 20(8):848–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. WHO (1997) WHO’s global healthy work approach. A strategy for the development of a comprehensive approach towards the promotion of health of all working populations. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ertürk S, Ege B, Yemişçigil A, Aktaş Ö (1994) Maluliyet oranları saptanan olguların özellikleri. 1. Ulusal Adli Tıp Kongresi (1–4 Kasım/İstanbul) Kongre kitabı İstanbul, pp. 139–142

    Google Scholar 

  23. Umut Ş (1984) Adli Tıp Açısından Maluliyetin değerlendirilmesi(Uzmanlık Tezi). T.C. Adalet Bakanlığı Adli tıp Kurumu Başkanlığı, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ways and means Committee (1996) Social security: the Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Programs. U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 104–114

    Google Scholar 

  25. Skov O, Jeune B, Lauritsen JM, Bafred T (1999) Occupational hand injuries. A population-based description of the incidence and referral to casualty departments. Ugeskr Laeger 161(22):3285–3288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan O (2001) İş Kazalarında Maliyet Metodolojisi, İ.Ü. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Master Tesis

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Faculty, Department of Forensic Medicine, Cukurova University, Adli Tip Anabilim Dali, 01330, Balcali, Adana, Turkey

    Mete Korkut Gulmen

  2. Medical Faculty, Department of Forensic Medicine and Public Health, Istanbul University, Beyazıt, 34452, Fatih/İstanbul, Istanbul, Turkey

    Haluk Ince

  3. Medical Faculty, Department of Forensic Medicine, Cukurova University, Çukurova Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü, 01330, Adana, Turkey

    Ahmet Hilal

Authors
  1. Mete Korkut Gulmen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haluk Ince
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmet Hilal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mete Korkut Gulmen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Santo Davide Ferrara

  2. Department of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Rafael Boscolo-Berto

  3. Department of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Guido Viel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gulmen, M.K., Ince, H., Hilal, A. (2016). Methods of Ascertainment of Personal Damage in Turkey. In: Ferrara, S., Boscolo-Berto, R., Viel, G. (eds) Personal Injury and Damage Ascertainment under Civil Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29812-2_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation