Skip to main content

Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Supply Chains

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Supply Chain Management ((SSSCM,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the mainstream method of life cycle assessment (LCA) on the basis of the generally accepted principles as laid down in International Organization for Standardization (ISO) series of Standards on LCA. The first part is devoted to the key questions addressed by LCA and sketches the historical development towards that method. The second part provides an overview of the LCA method itself, while the third part discusses some examples of LCA applications. Finally, the fourth part discusses some of the future challenges to LCA including life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) and streamlined LCA techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is partly based on Heijungs, R. & Guinée, J.B. (2012). An Overview of the Life Cycle Assessment Method—Past, Present, and Future. In: Curran, M.A. (Ed.), Life Cycle Assessment Handbook: A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products, pp. 15–42. Beverly: Scrivener Publishing.

References

  • Anex R, Lifset R (2014) Life cycle assessment—different models for different purposes. J Ind Ecol 18(3):321–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assies JA (1992) Introduction paper to SETAC-Europe workshop on environmental life cycle analysis of products. In life-cycle assessment, Proceedings of a SETAC-Europe workshop on Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products. December 2–3 1991, Leiden. SETAC-Europe, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products; UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris. http://www.estis.net/includes/file.asp?site=lcinit&file=524CEB61-779C-4610-8D5B-8D3B6B336463

  • Birkved M, Heijungs R (2011) Simplified fate modelling in respect to ecotoxicological and human toxicological characterisation of emissions of chemical compounds. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(8):739–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blass V, Chebach TC, Ashkenazy A (2017) Sustainable non-renewable materials management. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boukherroub T, Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (2017) Carbon footprinting in supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovea MD, Ibáñez-Forés V, Gallardo A, Colomer-Mendoza FJ (2010) Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies: a Spanish case study. Waste Manag 30(11):2383–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão M, Clift R, Cowie A, Greenhalgh S (2014) The use of LCA in the support of robust (climate) policy-making: comment on “Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):461–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran MA (ed) (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing, Beverly

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale B, Kim S (2014) Can the predictions of consequential life cycle assessment be tested in the real world? Comment on “Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):466–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T (2000) A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling. Resour Conserv Recycl 29(1–2):93–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall T, Assefa G, Björklund A, Eriksson O, Finnveden G (2007) What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. Waste Manag 27(8):989–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319(5867):1235–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JR, Montalbo TM, Kirchain RE (2013) Analyzing uncertainty in a comparative life cycle assessment of hand drying systems. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1605–1617. doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0606-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotz S, Rubik F (1997) Bibliographie Produktbilanzen. Publication series of the Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, No. 92/97

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB (ed), Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, de Koning A, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn JA, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Eco-Efficiency in industry and science, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Heijungs R (2011) Life cycle sustainability analysis: framing questions to approaches. J Ind Ecol 15(5):656–658. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00398.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Udo de Haes HA, Huppes G (1993) Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 1: goal definition and inventory. J Clean Prod 1(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Zamagni A, Masoni P, Buonamici R, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present and future. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96. doi:10.1021/es101316v

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILCD Handbook (2010) General guide for life cycle assessment—provisions and action steps. European Commission, JRC-IES, Ispra. http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdfdirectory/ILCD-Handbook-General-guide-for-LCA-ROVISIONSonline-12March2010.pdf. Accessed 29 Mar 2010

  • Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH (2012) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17(1):53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2012) An overview of the life cycle assessment method—past, present, and future. In: Curran MA (ed) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Scrivener Publishing, Beverly, pp 15–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Kleijn R (2001) Numerical approaches to life-cycle interpretation. Five examples. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6(3):141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson PJG, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, de Koning A, Green DM (2013) A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data—including estimates for uncertainty. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(2):429–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson PJG, Heijungs R, Dao HM, Phan LT, de Snoo GR, Guinée JB (2015) Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts. PLoS One 10(3), e0121221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich E (2014) Understanding the climate mitigation benefits of product systems: comment on “Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):464–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY (2017) Water footprint assessment in supply chains. In: Bouchery Y, Corbett CJ, Fransoo J, Tan T (eds) Sustainable supply chains: a research-based textbook on operations and strategy. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoschorner E, Finnveden G (2003) Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(3):119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJ, Hellweg S, Frischknecht R, Hendriks AJ, van de Meent D, Ragas AM, Reijnders L, Struijs J (2006) Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environ Sci Technol 40(3):641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (eds) (2008) Environmental life cycle costing. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt RG, Boguski TK, Weitz K, Sharma A (1998) Case studies examining LCA streamlining techniques. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(1):36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO International Standard 14040 (1996) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO International Standard 14041 (1998) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and Inventory analysis. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO International Standard 14042 (2000a) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle Impact assessment. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO International Standard 14043 (2000b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle Interpretation. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO International Standard 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO International Standard 14067 (2012) Greenhouse gases—carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO Technical Report 14047 (2003) Environmental management—life cycle impact assessment—examples of application of ISO 14042. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO Technical Report 14047 (2012a) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to impact assessment situations. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO Technical Report 14049 (2000) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14041—LCA—goal and scope definition and Inventory analysis (draft). International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO Technical Report 14049 (2012b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO Technical Specification 14048 (2002) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—data documentation format. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Industrial Ecology (JIE) (2012) Special issue: meta-analysis of life cycle assessments, April 2012, vol 16, Issue Supplement s1, pp S1–S205. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W, Grahl B (eds) (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA): a guide to best practice. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Klöpffer W, Renner I (2007) Lebenszyklusbasierte Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Produkten. Technikfolgenabschätzung—Theorie und Praxis (TATuP) 16:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews SH, Hendrickson C, Weber CL (2008) The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. Environ Sci Technol 42(16):5839–5842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesonen H-L, Horn S (2013) Evaluating the Sustainability SWOT as a streamlined tool for life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1780–1792. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0456-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, Creutzig F (2014a) Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation benefits misleads policy makers. J Ind Ecol 18(1):73–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, Creutzig F (2014b) Response to comments on “Using attributional life cycle assessment to estimate climate-change mitigation …”. J Ind Ecol 18(3):468–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plevin RJ, Delucchi MA, Creutzig F (2014c) Response to “On the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA” by Sangwon Suh and Yi Yang (Int J Life Cycle Assess, doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0739-9). Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1559–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JH (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh S, Yang Y (2014) On the uncanny capabilities of consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(6):1179–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BUS (Bundesamt für Umweltschutz) (1984) Ökobilanzen von Packstoffen. Schriftenreihe Umweltschutz no. 24. Bern, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Giesen C, Kleijn R, Kramer GJ (2014) Energy and climate impacts of producing synthetic hydrocarbon fuels from CO2. Environ Sci Technol 48(12):7111–7121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardenaar T, van Ruijven T, Beltran AM, Vad K, Guinée J, Heijungs R (2012) Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: a case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(8):1059–1067. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0431-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B (2000) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4(3):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP (2003) Market information in life cycle assessment. Environmental Project no. 863. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidema BP, Ekvall T, Heijungs R (2009) Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA. Technical Report of CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net

  • Wenzel H, Hauschild M, Alting L (1997) Methodology, tools and case studies in product development, vol 1, Environmental assessment of products. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A, Buttol P, Porta PL, Buonamici R, Masoni P, Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Ekvall T, Bersani R, Bieńkowska A, Pretato U (2008). Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISO-LCA practice. Deliverable 7 of the CALCAS project (http://www.estis.net/sites/calcas/)

  • Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Masoni P, Raggi A (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(7):904–918. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Guinée .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Yann Bouchery, Charles J. Corbett, Jan C. Fransoo, and Tarkan Tan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guinée, J., Heijungs, R. (2017). Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment. In: Bouchery, Y., Corbett, C., Fransoo, J., Tan, T. (eds) Sustainable Supply Chains. Springer Series in Supply Chain Management, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29791-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics