Abstract
A Bayesian framework for optimal experimental design in structural dynamics is presented. The optimal design is based on an expected utility function that measures the value of the information arising from alternative experimental designs and takes into account the uncertainties in model parameters and model prediction error. The evaluation of the expected utility function requires a large number of structural model simulations. Asymptotic techniques are used to simplify the expected utility functions under small model prediction error uncertainties, providing insight into the optimal design and drastically reducing the computation effort involved in the evaluation of the multi-dimensional integrals that arise. The framework is demonstrated using the design of sensors for modal identification and is applied to the design of a small number of reference sensors for experiments involving multiple sensor configuration setups accomplished with reference and moving sensors. In contrast to previous formulations, the Bayesian optimal experimental design overcomes the problem of the ill-conditioned Fisher information matrix for small number of reference sensors by exploiting the information in the prior distribution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Huan, X., Marzouk, Y.M.: Simulation-based optimal Bayesian experimental design for nonlinear systems. J. Comput. Phys. 232(1), 288–317 (2013)
Papadimitriou, C., Beck, J.L., Au, S.K.: Entropy-based optimal sensor location for structural model updating. J. Vib. Control. 6(5), 781–800 (2000)
Papadimitriou, C.: Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems. J. Sound Vib. 278(4), 923–947 (2004)
Papadimitriou, C., Lombaert, G.: The effect of prediction error correlation on optimal sensor placement in structural dynamics. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 28, 105–127 (2012)
Kammer, D.C.: Sensor placements for on orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures. J. Guid. Control. Dyn. 14, 251–259 (1991)
Lindley, D.V.: On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Ann. Math. Stat. 27, 986–1005 (1956)
Hansen, N., Muller, S.D., Koumoutsakos, P.: Reducing the time complexity of the derandomized evolution strategy with covariance matrix adaptation (CMA-ES). Evol. Comput. 11(1), 1–18 (2003)
Bleistein, N., Handelsman, R.: Asymptotic Expansions for Integrals. Dover, New York (1986)
Gerstner, T., Griebel, M.: Numerical integration using sparse grids. Numer. Algorithms 18, 209–232 (1998)
Bungartz, H.J., Griebel, M.: Sparse grids. Acta Numer. 13, 147–269 (2004)
Papadimitriou, D.I., Papadimitriou, C.: Optimal sensor placement for the estimation of turbulence model parameters in CFD. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 5, 1 (2015)
Papadimitriou, C., Papadioti, D.C.: Component mode synthesis techniques for finite element model updating. Comput. Struct. 126, 15–28 (2013)
Acknowledgement
This research has been implemented under the “ARISTEIA” Action of the “Operational Programme Education and Lifelong Learning” and was co-funded by the European Social Fund (ESF) and Greek National Resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Argyris, C., Papadimitriou, C. (2016). A Bayesian Framework for Optimal Experimental Design in Structural Dynamics. In: Atamturktur, S., Schoenherr, T., Moaveni, B., Papadimitriou, C. (eds) Model Validation and Uncertainty Quantification, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29754-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29754-5_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29753-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29754-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)