Skip to main content

Is Calculus Relevant to Survival? Managing the Evolutionary Novelty of Modern Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Humans have always educated their children, but until recently education was done “hands-on” by a parent, familiar adult, or more competent peer. It has only been within the last few centuries that a significant number of the world’s children must learn some culturally important context-independent skills, such as reading, writing, and mathematics. These skills are usually taught to children by unfamiliar adults in unfamiliar settings. The result is that much of formal education is an evolutionary novelty. Sitting in classrooms, reading books, or memorizing multiplication tables were certainly not requisite skills for our evolutionary forechildren to master. Yet such evolutionarily novel tasks are critical for functioning in modern societies, and children are quite capable of achieving such feats given appropriate attention and training. However, this leaves many contemporary societies with discrepancies between conditions of modern life and the evolutionary skill set endowed to each child by human cognitive evolution. It is the job of education to bridge this gap, and just as an evolutionary perspective can inform the study of child development at large, perhaps it can also inform educational practices. This chapter presents a brief summary of current common education practice and theory, followed by a description of theory and research underlying an evolutionary approach to education in an effort to prompt discussion regarding the merits and applicability of evolutionary reasoning to education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Foley R (1995) The adaptive legacy of human evolution: a search for the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Evol Anthropol Issues News Rev 4:194–203. doi:10.1002/evan.1360040603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Konner M (2010) The evolution of childhood: relationships emotions, mind. Belknap Press, Cabridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lancy D (2014) The anthropology of childhood, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lancy D, Grove MA (2010) The role of adults in children’s learning. In: Lancy DF, Bock J, Gaskins S (eds) The anthropology of learning in childhood. AltaMira Press, New York, pp 145–179

    Google Scholar 

  5. Postman N (1982) The disappearance of childhood. Vintage Books, New York. doi:10.1080/00094056.1985.10520201

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pellegrini AD (2005) Recess: its role in education and development. Erbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  7. Center on Education Policy (2008) Has student achievement increased since 2002: state test score trends through 2006–2007. CEP, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dee TS, Jacob B (2011) The impact of no child left behind on student achievement. J Policy Anal Manage 30:418–446. doi:10.1002/pam.20586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuller B, Wright J, Gesicki K, Kang E (2007) Gauging growth: how to judge no child left behind? Educ Res 36:268–278. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crain WC (2003) Reclaiming childhood: letting children be children in our achievement oriented society. Times Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray P (2013) Free to learn: why unleashing the instinct to play will make our childrenhappier, more self-reliant, and better students for life. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bjorklund DF, Bering JM (2002) The evolved child: applying evolutionary developmental psychology to modern schooling. Learn Individ Differ 12:1–27. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00047-X

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geary DC (2007) Educating the evolved mind: conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In: Carlson JS, Levin JR (eds) Educating the evolved mind: conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson DS, Geher G, Waldo J (2009) EvoS: completing the evolutionary synthesis in higher education. J Evol Stud Consortium 1:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carlson JS, Levin JR (eds) (2007) Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geary DC (1995) Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: implications for mathematical development and instruction. Am Psychol 50:24–37. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.1.24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Geary DC (2005) The origin of mind: evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Am Psychol Assoc, Washington, DC. doi:10.1037/10871-000

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Renninger K, Hidi SE, Krapp AE (1992) The role of interest in learning and development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huizinga J (1944; reprinted 1970) Homo ludens: a study of the play-element in culture. Paladin, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sutton-Smith B, Roberts JM (1970) The cross-cultural and psychological study of games. In: Lüschen G (ed) The cross-cultural analysis of sport and games. Stipes, Champagne, IL, pp 100–108). doi:10.1177/101269027100600105

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bjorklund DF, Sellers PD II (2011) The evolved child: adapted to family life. In: Roberts SC (ed) Applied evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 55–77

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gray P (2011) The decline of play and the rise of psychopathology in children and adolescents. Am J Play 3:443–463

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vygotsky LS (1978) Interaction between learning and development. In: Cole M, Joh Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E (eds) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blank M, White S (1999) Activating the zone of proximal development in school: obstacles and solutions. In: Lloyd P, Fernyhough C (eds) Lev Vygotsky: critical assessments, vol 3. The zone of proximal development. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rogoff B (1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Elias CL, Berk LE (2002) Self-regulation in young children: Is there a role for sociodramatic play? Early Child Res Q 17:216–238. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00146-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smilansky S (1968) The effects of sociodramatic play on disadvantaged preschool children. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pellegrini AD, Galda L (1982) The effects of thematic-fantasy play training on the development of children’s story comprehension. Am Educ Res J 19:443–452. doi:10.3102/00028312019003443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenberg D, Sadofsky M (1992) Legacy of trust: life after the Sudbury Valley School experience. The Sudbury Valley School, Sudbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Greenberg D, Sadofsky M, Lempka J (2005) The pursuit of happiness: the lives of Sudbury Valley alumni. The Sudbury Valley School, Sudbury, MA

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson DS, Kauffman RA Jr, Purdy MS (2011) A program for at-risk high-school students informed by evolutionary science. PLoS ONE 6:e27826. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective, action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bjorklund DF (2007) The most educable of species. In: Carlson JS, Levin JR (eds) Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 119–129

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hirsh-Pasek K, Hyson MC, Rescorla L (1990) Academic environments in preschool: do they pressure or challenge young children. Early Educ Dev 1:401–423. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed0106_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bjorklund DF (1997) The role of immaturity in human development. Psychol Bull 122:153–169. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.2.153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bjorklund DF, Green BL (1992) The adaptive nature of cognitive immaturity. Am Psychol 47:46–54. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Papousek H (1977) The development of learning ability in infancy (Entwicklung de Lernfähigkeit im Säuglingsalter). In: Nissen G (ed) Intelligence, learning, and learning disabilities (Intelligenz, Lernen und Lernstörungen). Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  39. Richert R, Robb MB, Fender JG, Wartella E (2010) Word learning from baby videos. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164 (No. 5). Published online, March 1. WWW.ARCHPEDIATRICS.COM. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.24

  40. Courage ML, Murphy AN, Goulding S, Setliff AE (2010) When the television is on: the impact of infant directed video on 6-and 18-month-olds’ attention during to play and on parent–infant interaction. Infant Behav Dev 33:176–188. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zimmerman FJ, Christakis DA, Meltzoff AN (2007) Television and DVD/video viewing in children younger than 2 years. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:473–479. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.5.473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Courage ML, Setliff AE (2010) When babies watch television: attention-getting, a tention-holding, and the implications for learning from video material. Dev Rev 30:220–238. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Turkewitz G, Kenny PA (1982) Limitations on input as a basis for neural organization and perceptual development: a preliminary theoretical statement. Dev Psychobiol 15:357–368. doi:10.1002/dev.420150408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Burts DC, Hart CH, Charlesworth R, DeWolf DM, Ray J, Manuel K, Fleege PO (1993) Developmental appropriateness of kindergarten programs and academic outcomes in first grade. J Res Childhood Educ 8:23–31. doi:10.1080/02568549309594852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Marcon RA (1999) Differential impact of preschool models on development and early learning of inner-city children: a three-cohort study. Dev Psychol 35:358–375. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.2.358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hyson MC, Hirsh-Pasek K, Rescorla L (1990) The classroom practices inventory: an observation instrument based on NAEYC’s guidelines for developmentally appropriate practices for 4-and 5-year-old children. Early Childhood Res Q 5:475–494. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(90)90015-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Baron-Cohen S, Lombardo M, Tager-Flusberg H, Cohen D (eds) (2013) Und standing other minds: perspectives from developmental social neuroscience. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ellis BJ, Del Giudice M, Dishion TJ, Figueredo AJ, Gray P, Griskevicius V, Wilson DS (2012) The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: implications for science, policy, and practice. Dev Psychol 48:598–623. doi:10.1037/a0026220

    Google Scholar 

  49. U.S. Department of Education (2014) Public high school four-year on-time graduation rates and event dropout rates: school years 2010–11 and 2011–2012. Retrieved May 1, 2014. http://nces.ed.gov

  50. Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor (2014) College Enrollment and Work Activity of 2013 High School Graduates. Retrieved May 1, 2014, www.bls.gov

  51. Geary DC (1998) Male, female: the evolution of human sex differences. American Psychological Association, Washington D. C., p 180)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Douglas Sellers II Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sellers, P.D., Machluf, K., Bjorklund, D.F. (2016). Is Calculus Relevant to Survival? Managing the Evolutionary Novelty of Modern Education. In: Alvergne, A., Jenkinson, C., Faurie, C. (eds) Evolutionary Thinking in Medicine. Advances in the Evolutionary Analysis of Human Behaviour. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29716-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29716-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29714-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29716-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics