Skip to main content

Progressive Collapse Simulation of Vulnerable Reinforced Concrete Buildings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2146 Accesses

Abstract

There are many vulnerable reinforced concrete (RC) buildings located in earthquake-prone areas around the world. These buildings are characterized by the lack of seismic details and corresponding non-ductile behavior and significant potential of partial and global collapse. One of the current challenges of the earthquake engineering profession and research communities is the identification of such buildings and determination of effective and economical retrofit methods for response enhancement. Identification of these buildings is not a trivial task due to the various sources of non-ductile behavior and the large number of involved sources of uncertainty. Furthermore, accurate determination of collapse-prone buildings is important from an economical perspective. Unfortunately, there are not enough economical resources to retrofit all the non-ductile buildings that have the symptoms for collapse potential. In order to use the available monetary resources in an effective manner, these buildings should be accurately and reliably ranked to identify those that are most vulnerable to collapse. This chapter intends to provide a contribution to the accurate determination of the most collapse-vulnerable non-ductile RC buildings by discussing the methods from existing literature and exploring the research needs related to (a) gravity load failure modeling and (b) consideration of different uncertainty sources in an efficient manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Elwood, K. J., Matamoros, A., Wallace, J. W., Lehman, D. E., Heintz, J. A., Mitchell, A., et al. (2007). Update of ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 493–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, K. J., & Moehle, J. P. (2005). Axial capacity model for shear-damaged columns. ACI Structural Journal, 102, 578–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson, D. E., Xu, L., & Liu, Y. (2005). Progressive-failure analysis of buildings subjected to abnormal loading. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(3), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, W. M. (2011). Analytical and experimental assessment of seismic vulnerability of beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement in concrete buildings. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, W. T. (2000). Risk assessment and retrofit of existing buildings. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand. Paper No: 2826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueste, M. B. D., & Wight, J. K. (1999). Nonlinear punching shear failure model for interior slab-column connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(9), 997–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. J. R., Pister, K. S., & Taylor, R. L. (1979). Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 17(18), 159–182.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kadysiewski, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2008). Modeling of unreinforced masonry infill walls considering in-plane and out-of-plane interaction (PEER Report 2008/102, 144 pp.). Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, T. H.-K., Wallace, J. W., & Elwood, K. J. (2009). Nonlinear modeling of flat plate systems. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(2), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, J. W., & Mahin, S. A. (2013). Experimental and analytical studies on the seismic behavior of conventional and hybrid braced frames (PEER Report 2013/20, 633 pp.). Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2005). Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(14), 1719–1736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T.-H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2006). Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems (PEER Report 2006/04, 181 pp.). Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liel, A., Haselton, C., Deierlein, G., & Baker, J. (2009). Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Structural Safety, 31(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosalam, K. M., & Günay, M. S. (2012). Behavior and modeling of reinforced concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls. In S. K. Kunnath (Ed.), Structural engineering and geomechanics. Oxford, UK: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.eolss.net

  • Mosalam, K. M., & Günay, M. S. (2015). Progressive collapse analysis of RC frames with URM infill walls considering in-plane/out-of-plane interaction. Earthquake Spectra. 31(2), 921–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosalam, K. M., Günay, M. S., & Sweat, H. D. (2013). Simulation of reinforced concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls with emphasis on critical modelling aspects. 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, June 2–5, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosalam, K. M., Liang, X., Günay, S., & Schellenberg, A. (2013). Alternative integrators and parallel computing for efficient nonlinear response history analyses. In M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, & V. Plevris (Eds.), COMPDYN 2013, 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, June 12–14, Kos Island, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosalam, K. M., Park, S., & Günay, M. S. (2009). Evaluation of an element removal algorithm for shear critical reinforced concrete frames. COMPDYN, Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, June 22–24, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2010). Program plan for the development of collapse assessment and mitigation strategies for existing reinforced concrete buildings (Report No. NIST GCR 10-917-7, NEHRP).

    Google Scholar 

  • OpenSees Wiki. (2011). http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Infill_Wall_Model_and_Element_Removal.

  • Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2009). Shear strength models of exterior beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement (PEER Report 2009/106, 101 pp.). Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2012a). Parameters for shear strength prediction of exterior beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 36(3), 198–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2012b). Analytical model for predicting the shear strength of unreinforced exterior beam-column joints. ACI Structural Journal, 102(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2012c). Experimental and analytical studies on reinforced concrete buildings with seismically vulnerable beam-column joints (PEER Report 2012/03, 224 pp.). Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2013a). Simulation of reinforced concrete frames with non-ductile beam-column joints. Earthquake Spectra, 29(1), 233–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2013b). Experimental investigation of non-ductile reinforced concrete corner beam-column joints with floor slabs. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., & Shaikhutdinov, R. V. (2002). Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra, 18(4), 719–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talaat, M., & Mosalam, K. M. (2007). Computational modeling of progressive collapse in reinforced concrete frame structures (PEER Report 2007/10, 310 pp.). Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talaat, M., & Mosalam, K. M. (2009). Modeling progressive collapse in reinforced concrete buildings using direct element removal. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38(5), 609–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. W., Elwood, K. J., & Massone, L. M. (2008). An axial load capacity model for shear critical RC wall piers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(9), 1548–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khalid M. Mosalam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mosalam, K.M., Günay, S. (2016). Progressive Collapse Simulation of Vulnerable Reinforced Concrete Buildings. In: Gardoni, P., LaFave, J. (eds) Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29711-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29713-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics