Abstract
There are many vulnerable reinforced concrete (RC) buildings located in earthquake-prone areas around the world. These buildings are characterized by the lack of seismic details and corresponding non-ductile behavior and significant potential of partial and global collapse. One of the current challenges of the earthquake engineering profession and research communities is the identification of such buildings and determination of effective and economical retrofit methods for response enhancement. Identification of these buildings is not a trivial task due to the various sources of non-ductile behavior and the large number of involved sources of uncertainty. Furthermore, accurate determination of collapse-prone buildings is important from an economical perspective. Unfortunately, there are not enough economical resources to retrofit all the non-ductile buildings that have the symptoms for collapse potential. In order to use the available monetary resources in an effective manner, these buildings should be accurately and reliably ranked to identify those that are most vulnerable to collapse. This chapter intends to provide a contribution to the accurate determination of the most collapse-vulnerable non-ductile RC buildings by discussing the methods from existing literature and exploring the research needs related to (a) gravity load failure modeling and (b) consideration of different uncertainty sources in an efficient manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Elwood, K. J., Matamoros, A., Wallace, J. W., Lehman, D. E., Heintz, J. A., Mitchell, A., et al. (2007). Update of ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions. Earthquake Spectra, 23(3), 493–523.
Elwood, K. J., & Moehle, J. P. (2005). Axial capacity model for shear-damaged columns. ACI Structural Journal, 102, 578–587.
Grierson, D. E., Xu, L., & Liu, Y. (2005). Progressive-failure analysis of buildings subjected to abnormal loading. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 20(3), 155–171.
Hassan, W. M. (2011). Analytical and experimental assessment of seismic vulnerability of beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement in concrete buildings. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Holmes, W. T. (2000). Risk assessment and retrofit of existing buildings. 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand. Paper No: 2826.
Hueste, M. B. D., & Wight, J. K. (1999). Nonlinear punching shear failure model for interior slab-column connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(9), 997–1007.
Hughes, T. J. R., Pister, K. S., & Taylor, R. L. (1979). Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 17(18), 159–182.
Kadysiewski, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2008). Modeling of unreinforced masonry infill walls considering in-plane and out-of-plane interaction (PEER Report 2008/102, 144 pp.). Berkeley, CA.
Kang, T. H.-K., Wallace, J. W., & Elwood, K. J. (2009). Nonlinear modeling of flat plate systems. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(2), 147–158.
Lai, J. W., & Mahin, S. A. (2013). Experimental and analytical studies on the seismic behavior of conventional and hybrid braced frames (PEER Report 2013/20, 633 pp.). Berkeley, CA.
Lee, T.-H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2005). Seismic demand sensitivity of reinforced concrete shear-wall building using FOSM method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(14), 1719–1736.
Lee, T.-H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2006). Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems (PEER Report 2006/04, 181 pp.). Berkeley, CA.
Liel, A., Haselton, C., Deierlein, G., & Baker, J. (2009). Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Structural Safety, 31(2), 197–211.
Mosalam, K. M., & Günay, M. S. (2012). Behavior and modeling of reinforced concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls. In S. K. Kunnath (Ed.), Structural engineering and geomechanics. Oxford, UK: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers. Retrieved February 19, 2013, from http://www.eolss.net
Mosalam, K. M., & Günay, M. S. (2015). Progressive collapse analysis of RC frames with URM infill walls considering in-plane/out-of-plane interaction. Earthquake Spectra. 31(2), 921–943.
Mosalam, K. M., Günay, M. S., & Sweat, H. D. (2013). Simulation of reinforced concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infill walls with emphasis on critical modelling aspects. 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, June 2–5, Vancouver.
Mosalam, K. M., Liang, X., Günay, S., & Schellenberg, A. (2013). Alternative integrators and parallel computing for efficient nonlinear response history analyses. In M. Papadrakakis, V. Papadopoulos, & V. Plevris (Eds.), COMPDYN 2013, 4th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, June 12–14, Kos Island, Greece.
Mosalam, K. M., Park, S., & Günay, M. S. (2009). Evaluation of an element removal algorithm for shear critical reinforced concrete frames. COMPDYN, Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, June 22–24, Greece.
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2010). Program plan for the development of collapse assessment and mitigation strategies for existing reinforced concrete buildings (Report No. NIST GCR 10-917-7, NEHRP).
OpenSees Wiki. (2011). http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Infill_Wall_Model_and_Element_Removal.
Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2009). Shear strength models of exterior beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement (PEER Report 2009/106, 101 pp.). Berkeley, CA.
Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2012a). Parameters for shear strength prediction of exterior beam-column joints without transverse reinforcement. Engineering Structures, 36(3), 198–209.
Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2012b). Analytical model for predicting the shear strength of unreinforced exterior beam-column joints. ACI Structural Journal, 102(2), 149–160.
Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2012c). Experimental and analytical studies on reinforced concrete buildings with seismically vulnerable beam-column joints (PEER Report 2012/03, 224 pp.). Berkeley, CA.
Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2013a). Simulation of reinforced concrete frames with non-ductile beam-column joints. Earthquake Spectra, 29(1), 233–257.
Park, S., & Mosalam, K. M. (2013b). Experimental investigation of non-ductile reinforced concrete corner beam-column joints with floor slabs. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 139(1), 1–14.
Porter, K. A., Beck, J. L., & Shaikhutdinov, R. V. (2002). Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra, 18(4), 719–743.
Talaat, M., & Mosalam, K. M. (2007). Computational modeling of progressive collapse in reinforced concrete frame structures (PEER Report 2007/10, 310 pp.). Berkeley, CA.
Talaat, M., & Mosalam, K. M. (2009). Modeling progressive collapse in reinforced concrete buildings using direct element removal. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38(5), 609–634.
Wallace, J. W., Elwood, K. J., & Massone, L. M. (2008). An axial load capacity model for shear critical RC wall piers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(9), 1548–1557.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mosalam, K.M., Günay, S. (2016). Progressive Collapse Simulation of Vulnerable Reinforced Concrete Buildings. In: Gardoni, P., LaFave, J. (eds) Multi-hazard Approaches to Civil Infrastructure Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29711-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29713-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)