Skip to main content

Islam as Feared Other: Perception and Reaction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fear of Muslims?

Abstract

Perceptions of Islam are often dominated by misrepresentation and distorted image, which arises largely from misunderstanding and ignorance, manifest in at least three modalities or kinds: (1) that of simple or innocent lack of knowledge; (2) a ‘blind’ ignorance born of some form of cognitive barrier; and (3) the culpable ignorance of a deliberate refusal to acknowledge, learn of, and consider the reality as presented by evidence. This yields a false understanding of Islam shaped by long-standing bias and fuelled by contemporary media representation. Perceptions about the political agenda of Muslims, whether accurate or not, tend to fuel anxieties about Islam and so contribute to Islamophobia. Furthermore, this ignorance-based perception aids and abets the phenomenon identified as reactive co-radicalisation. The reaction to the perception of Islam leads to a form of extremism in its own right, such as evidenced by the Swiss ban on the building of minarets, and the Norwegian massacre carried out by Anders Behring Breivik. This paradoxically fuels the Islamist rhetoric that stokes the fires of Islamist extremism. Yet, despite the notion of identifying with a universalised umma, for the most part Muslims construe their Islamic identity in respect to the particularities of race, culture, location and up-bringing—much like any other religious person.

This chapter is a revised and updated version of a paper previously published by Douglas Pratt in 2011 as Islamophobia: Ignorance, imagination, identity and interaction, Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 22(4): 379–389. DOI:10.1080/09596410.2011.606185. © University of Birmingham, reprinted by permission of Taylor & Francis Ltd, www.tandfonline.com on behalf of University of Birmingham.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, Andrew Rippin (1993, 28ff.) delineates three major groupings or categories of Muslim response to the modern age: ‘traditionalist’; ‘revivalist’ (sometimes referred to as ‘fundamentalist’); and ‘modernist’. William Shepard (1987) classifies the variant responses as Islamic ‘secularism’, ‘modernism’, ‘Islamism’, ‘traditionalism’, and ‘neo-traditionalism’.

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Pratt (2013).

  3. 3.

    See Breivik’s 1518 page ‘manifesto’ with title ‘2083—A European Declaration of Independence’ in which he asserts ‘the fear of Islam is all but irrational’ and claims to address ‘related historical events and aspects of past and current Islamic Imperialism’. This is available at: http://goo.gl/JWT5vw

  4. 4.

    For an excellent critical discussion of Breivik and the wider context of his actions, see Bangstad (2014).

  5. 5.

    Notably the Dutch PVV, the Sweden Democrats, the Norwegian Peoples’ Party, the True Finns, and the Hungarian Jobbik party.

References

  • Asprem, E. (2011). The birth of counterjihadist terrorism: Reflections on some unspoken dimensions of 22 July 2011. The Pomengranate, 13(1), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangstad, S. (2014). Anders Breivik and the rise of Islamophobia. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behloul, S. M. (2009). Minarett-Initiative: Im Spannungsfeld zwischen Abwehr-Reflex und impliziter Anerkennung nuer gesellschaftlicher Fakten. In M. Tanner, F. Müller, F. Mathwig, & W. Lienemann (Eds.), Streit um das Minarett: Zusammenleben in der religiöse pluralistischen Gesellschaft (pp. 103–122). Zürich: Theologischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J., & Kalin, I. (Eds.). (2011). Islamophobia: The challenge of the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halafoff, A. (2013). Encounters as conflict: Interfaith peace-building. In D. Cheetham, D. Pratt, & D. Thomas (Eds.), Understanding interreligious relations (pp. 262–280). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentini, P. (2013). Neojihadism: Towards a new understanding of terrorism and extremism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). The new religious intolerance: Overcoming the politics of fear in an anxious age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. (2010). Muslim—Jewish relations: Some Islamic paradigms. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 21(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. (2013). Fundamentalism, exclusivism and religious extremism. In D. Cheetham, D. Pratt, & D. Thomas (Eds.), Understanding interreligious relations (pp. 241–261). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F. (2002). Islam (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippin, A. (1993). Muslims: Their religious beliefs and practices: Vol. 2. The contemporary period (Library of religious beliefs and practices). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, W. E. (1987). Islam and ideology: Towards a typology. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 19(3), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye’or, B. (2005). Eurabia: The Euro-Arab axis. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas Pratt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pratt, D. (2016). Islam as Feared Other: Perception and Reaction. In: Pratt, D., Woodlock, R. (eds) Fear of Muslims?. Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29698-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics