Abstract
Disparity is the distinctive feature of Cuban-US relations. Power asymmetry is not limited to differences in capacities but also involves systemic differences in the ways states assess security risks and define their interests and perceptions. As Brantly Womack (2006) explains, “mutual perceptions and interactions in an asymmetric relation will be fundamentally shaped by the differences of opportunity and vulnerability each side confronts. In effect, the relationship of A and B is best viewed as a set of two very different sub relations, A → b and b →A” (pp. 17–18). In the case of Cuba and the United States, the latter country plans and discusses its foreign policy strategy as a Great Power, while the former does so as a small, vulnerable, and developing state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alzugaray, Carlos. 1999. “Is Normalization Possible between Cuba and the United States after 100 Years of History?” Washington: Latin American Studies Association.
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Brenner, Phillip, Patrick Haney, and Walt Vanderbush. 2008. “Intermestic Interests and US Foreign Policy towards Cuba.” In The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy, edited by Eugene Wittkopf and James McCormick, 65–80. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Bull, Hedley. 2012. The Anarchical Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan-Columbia University.
Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University.
Cronin, Bruce. 2001. “The Paradox of Hegemony: America’s Ambiguous Relationship with the United Nations.” European Journal of International Relations 7.1: 103–30.
Domínguez, Jorge. 1989. To Make the World Safe for Revolution: Cuba’s Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Harvard University.
Halliday, Fred. 1994. “International Society as Homogeneity: Burke, Marx and Fukuyama.” In Rethinking International Relations, edited by Fred Halliday, 94–123. London: Macmillan.
—. 1999. Revolution and World Politics: The Rise of the Sixth Great Power. Durham: Duke University.
Landau, Saul, and Nelson Valdez. 2010. Confesiones de Roger Noriega: ¿Diplomacia Muscular o Violación de la Ley? Rebelión, September 22. http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=113135.
LeoGrande, William, and Peter Kornbluh. 2014. Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations between Washington and Havana. Chapel Hills: University of North Carolina.
Lopez-Levy, Arturo. 2014. “Fighting Ebola: A New Case for U.S. Engagement with Cuba.” Tampa Bay Tribune, October 28.
Martí, José. 1891.“Our America.” La Revista Ilustrada, January 1. http://writing.upenn.edu/library/Marti_Jose_Our-America.html.
McCoy, Jennifer. 2015. “Jimmy Carter Paved the Way for U.S. and Cuba Relations.” Time, August 15. http://time.com/3998306/us-embassy-cuba-jimmy-carter/.
Neumann, Iver. 1996. “Self and Other in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations. 2.2: 139–74.
Nye, Joseph. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Womack, Brantly. 2006. China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. New York: Cambridge University.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lopez-Levy, A. (2016). Cuba-US: The December 17 Agreement in the Rationale of Asymmetric Relations. In: Hershberg, E., LeoGrande, W.M. (eds) A New Chapter in US-Cuba Relations. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29595-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29595-4_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31151-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29595-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)