Skip to main content

Towards a Body of Knowledge in Formal Methods for the Railway Domain: Identification of Settled Knowledge

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Techniques for Safety-Critical Systems (FTSCS 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 596))

Abstract

Bodies of Knowledge (BoK) are available only in mature technical fields, in which professional practices and technical rules have been well established (i.e.: ‘settled’), and are compiled for any prospective or current practitioner to refer to. By their factual establishment they also become professionally normative to a considerable extent. As a precursor to establishing a BoK it is important to determine whether or not a target domain already contains sufficient ‘settled’ knowledge, and, if yes, how such knowledge can be identified for its reproduction. In the undisputed safety-critical railway domain, formal methods have been applied for several decades in the solution of various modelling and verification problems. The application of many of those formal methods in the railway domain has also reached sufficient levels of maturity or ‘stability’ — yet no BoK for this domain has ever been compiled so far. Thus the time is ripe now to start such a project. In this paper, with regard to the necessary identification of settled knowledge, we apply the lattice-theoretical methods of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) in order to structure and organise large amounts of relevant bibliometric data from the railway domain’s corpus of literature. In other words, we construct a formal concept lattice, the semantics of which is suitable for revealing the ‘settled’ parts of this domain. As a result of our formalised domain analysis, we provide a clear and theoretically well-grounded indication of the ‘settled’ themes and topics which any future BoK on Formal Methods in the Railway Domain ought to contain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.fmeurope.org/.

  2. 2.

    \(\mapsto \) defines a relation pair, and \(:=\) precedes a definition statement.

References

  1. Arageorgis, A., Baltas, A.: Demarcating technology from science: problems and problem solving in technology. Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 20(2), 212–229 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bjørner, D.: Formal software techniques in railway systems. In: Proceedings 9th IFAC Symposium on Control in Transportation Systems, pp. 1–12. VDI/VDE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bjørner, D.: TRain: the railway domain. http://euler.fd.cvut.cz/railwaydomain/

  4. Bunge, M.: Philosophy of Science: From Explanation to Justification, vol. 2, Revised edn. Transaction Publ., Piscataway (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buzmakov, A., Kuznetsov, S., Napoli, A.: Is concept stability a measure for pattern selection? Procedia Comput. Sci. 31, 918–927 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fantechi, A.: Twenty-five years of formal methods and railways: what next? In: Counsell, S., Núñez, M. (eds.) SEFM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8368, pp. 167–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Mathematische Grundlagen. Springer, Berlin (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruner, S., Haxthausen, A., Maibaum, T., Roggenbach, M.: FM-RAIL-BOK organizers’ message. In: Counsell, S., Núñez, M. (eds.) SEFM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8368. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruner, S., Haxthausen, A., Maibaum, T., Roggenbach, M.: Homepage of the workshop on a formal methods body of knowledge for railway control and safety systems (2013). https://ssfmgroup.wordpress.com/rel/

  10. Jackson, M.: Formal methods and traditional engineering. J. Syst. Softw. 40, 191–194 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, A.: A preparatory study towards a body of knowledge in the field of formal methods for the railway domain. Master-of-Applied Science Dissertation, McMaster University, Canada (2015). http://hdl.handle.net/11375/18416

  12. Kuznetsov, S.: On stability of a formal concept. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 49(1–4), 101–115 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuznetsov, S., Ignatov, D.: Concept stability for constructing taxonomies of web-site users. Computing Research Repository (CoRR) abs/0905.1424 (2009)

  14. Maibaum, T.: What is a BoK? large: extended abstract. In: Counsell, S., Núñez, M. (eds.) SEFM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8368, pp. 184–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Poser, H.: On structural differences between science and engineering. Digital Library and Archives of the Virginia Tech University Libraries (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis homepage. http://www.fcahome.org.uk/

  17. Roth, C., Obiedkov, S., Kourie, D.G.: Towards concise representation for taxonomies of epistemic communities. In: Yahia, S.B., Nguifo, E.M., Belohlavek, R. (eds.) CLA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4923, pp. 240–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaw, M.: The Coming-of-age of software architecture research. In: Proceedings 23rd ICSE, pp. 656–663. IEEE Computer Society (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vincenti, W.: What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies From Aeronautical History. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yevtushenko, S., ConExp,: Concept Explorer. http://conexp.sourceforge.net/

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to a number of experts, who have been helpful and supportive during the course of our project, especially: Sergei Obiedkov, Markus Roggenbach, Anne Haxthausen, Hannes Gräbe, Jackie van der Westhuizen, René Hosse, Jan Welte, Francesco Flammini, Hans True, Jérôme Lalouette, and Stefan Östlund. Many thanks also to the anonymous reviewers of FTSCS’15 for their constructive remarks. Last but not least many thanks to the workshop participants, particularly José Meseguer, for some interesting questions and comments during our meeting in Paris.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Gruner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gruner, S., Kumar, A., Maibaum, T. (2016). Towards a Body of Knowledge in Formal Methods for the Railway Domain: Identification of Settled Knowledge. In: Artho, C., Ölveczky, P. (eds) Formal Techniques for Safety-Critical Systems. FTSCS 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 596. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29510-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29510-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29509-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29510-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics