Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 427))

Abstract

Prediction of risk assessment is demanding because it is one of the most important contributory factors towards grid computing. Hence, researchers were motivated for developing and deploying grids on diverse computers, which is responsible for spreading resources across administrative domains so that resource sharing becomes effective. Risk assessment in grid computing can analyses possible risks, that is, the risk of growing computational requirements of an organization. Thus, risk assessment helps in determining these risks. In this, we present an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system that can provide an insight of predicting the risk environment. The main goal of this paper is to obtain empirical results with an illustration of high performance and accurate results. We used data mining tools to determine the contributing attributes so that we can obtain the risk prediction accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdelwahab, S., Abraham, A.: A review of the risk factors in computational grid. J. Inf. Assur. Secur. 8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hossain, S.J., Ahmad, N.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) based surface roughness prediction model for ball end milling operation. J. Mech. Eng. Res. 4, 112–129 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abraham, A.: Adaptation of fuzzy inference system using neural learning. In: Nedjah, N. et al. (eds.) Fuzzy Systems Engineering: Theory and Practice. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pp. 53–83. Springer, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abraham, A.: Neuro fuzzy systems: state-of-the-art modeling techniques. In: Connectionist Models of Neurons, Learning Processes, and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 269–276. Springer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bey, K.B., Benhammadi, F., Mokhtari, A., Guessoum, Z.: CPU load prediction model for distributed computing. In: Eighth International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2009. Ispdc’09, pp. 39–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karthika, B., Deka, P.C.: Prediction of air temperature by hybridized model (wavelet-ANFIS) using wavelet decomposed data. Aquat. Procedia 4, 1155–1161 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Djemame, K., Gourlay, I., Padgett, J., Birkenheuer, G., Hovestadt, M., Kao, O.V., Kerstin: Introducing risk management into the grid. In: Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, 2006. e-Science’06, pp. 28–28 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sangrasi, A., Djemame, K.: Component level risk assessment in grids: a probablistic risk model and experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies Conference (DEST), 2011, pp. 68–75 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Negoita, C., Zadeh, L., Zimmermann, H.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carlsson, C., Fullér, R.: Risk assessment of SLAs in grid computing with predictive probabilistic and possibilistic models. In: Preferences and Decisions, pp. 11–29. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gourlay, I., Djemame, K., Padgett, J.: Reliability and risk in grid resource brokering. In: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, 2008. DEST 2008, pp. 437–443 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raju, N., Gottumukkala, Y.L., Leangsuksun, C.B., Nassar, R., Scott, S.: Reliability analysis in HPC clusters. In: Proceedings of the High Availability and Performance Computing Workshop (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abdelwahab, S., Abraham, A.: Data mining approach for modeling risk assessment in computational grid. In: Computational Intelligence in Data Mining, vol. 3, pp. 673–684. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, M.A., Smith, L.A.: Feature subset selection: a correlation based filter approach. Presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Neural Information Processing and Intelligent Information Systems (ICONIP’97). New Zealand, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rana, O.F., Warnier, M., Quillinan, T.B., Brazier, F., Cojocarasu, D.: Managing violations in service level agreements. In: Grid Middleware and Services, pp. 349–358. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Syed, R.H., Syrame, M., Bourgeois, J.: Protecting grids from cross-domain attacks using security alert sharing mechanisms. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 536–547 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakrabarti, A.: Taxonomy of grid security issues. In: Grid Computing Security, pp. 33–47. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, H.M., Chung, K.S., Jin, S.H., Lee, D.-W., Lee, W.G., Jung, S.Y.Y., Chang, H.: A fault tolerance service for QoS in grid computing. In: Computational Science—ICCS 2003, pp. 286–296. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, M., Friese, T., Engel, M., Freisleben, B.: Countering security threats in service-oriented on-demand grid computing using sandboxing and trusted computing techniques. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 66, 1189–1204 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chakrabarti, A., Damodaran, A., Sengupta, S.: Grid computing security: a taxonomy. IEEE Secur. Priv. 44–51 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kar, S., Sahoo, B.: An anamaly detection system for DDOS attack in grid computing. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Eng. Technol. Sci. (IJ-CA-ETS), 1, 553–557 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naqvi, S., Riguidel, M.: Threat model for grid security services. In: Advances in Grid Computing-EGC 2005, pp. 1048–1055. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barua, A., Mudunuri, L.S., Kosheleva, O.: Why trapezoidal and triangular membership functions work so well: towards a theoretical explanation. J. Uncertain Syst. 8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the IPROCOM Marie Curie Initial Training Network, funded through the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013/, under REA grant agreement number 316555.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varun Kumar Ojha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdelwahab, S., Ojha, V.K., Abraham, A. (2016). Neuro-Fuzzy Risk Prediction Model for Computational Grids. In: Abraham, A., Wegrzyn-Wolska, K., Hassanien, A., Snasel, V., Alimi, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Afro-European Conference for Industrial Advancement AECIA 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 427. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29504-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29503-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29504-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics