Abstract
Cognitive overload can be a serious impediment in the assimilation of information for all types of users. Research has demonstrated the usefulness of adaptive interfaces in reducing cognitive overload by providing an interface that automatically reacts to the end users’ information foraging behavior. In order to understand and compare behaviors and patterns (between sighted and low vision users), it is necessary to understand the information seeking behavior of sighted users for any patterns that may exist as a baseline. These findings can then be compared to data on low vision users in a future study. In this study, eye tracking is used to explore information seeking behavior of visual users. In particular, we compare the gaze patterns of users when using both a traditional interface and complex interface to identify current events of interest. The eye tracking data was analyzed using kernel density statistics and correlation analysis to determine if relationships exist between information seeking behavior, task completion and accuracy. Results show that information seeking behavior tends to be more efficient and accurate when using the traditional interface and that a more complex interface introduces additional cognitive overload.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aziz N, Mutalib AA, Sarif SM (2015) Conceptual design model of assistive courseware for low vision (AC4LV) learners. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advances in Education Technology, Bandung, Indonesia
Bonavero Y, Huchard M, Meynard M (2015) Reconciling user and designer preferences in adapting web pages for people with low vision. In: Proceedings of the 12th Web for All Conference, Florence, Italy
Conradie P, De Marez L, Saldien J (2015) Participation is blind: Involving low vision lead users in product development. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion, Sankt Augustin, Germany
Denenberg DA, Hansen L, Czarnota N, Chakraborty J, Norcio AF (2005) The effects of color and layering on comprehension of multi-layered email messages. In: Proceedings of the Human Computer Interaction International, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Duchowski A (2007) Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. Springer
Fletcher V, Bonome-Sims G, Knecht B, Ostroff E, Otitigbe J, Parente M et al. (2015) The challenge of inclusive design in the US context. Applied Ergonomics 46: 267-273
Fung CH, Igodan U, Alessi C, Martin JL, Dzierzewski JM, Josephson K et al. (2015) Human factors/usability barriers to home medical devices among individuals with disabling conditions: In-depth interviews with positive airway pressure device users. Disability and Health Journal 8(1): 86-92
Jacob RJ, Karn KS (2003) Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. Mind 2(3): 4
Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2): 81
Norcio AF, Stanley J (1989) Adaptive human-computer interfaces: A literature survey and perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19(2): 399-408
Pirolli P (2005) Rational analyses of information foraging on the web. Cognitive Science 29(3): 343-373
Pirolli P (2007) Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA
Pirolli P, Card S (1999) Information foraging. Psychological Review 106(4): 643
Putze F, Hild J, Kärgel R, Herff C, Redmann A, Beyerer J et al. (2013) Locating user attention using eye tracking and EEG for spatio-temporal event selection. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Santa Monica, CA, USA
Salvucci DD, Anderson JR (2000) Intelligent gaze-added interfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands
Waller S, Bradley M, Hosking I, Clarkson PJ (2015) Making the case for inclusive design. Applied Ergonomics 46(Part B): 297-303
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chakraborty, J., McGuire, M.P., Pandey, G. (2016). Preliminary Findings from an Information Foraging Behavioural Study Using Eye Tracking. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Designing Around People. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29498-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29498-8_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29496-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29498-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)