Skip to main content

Transesophageal Echocardiographic-Guided Cardioversion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Intraprocedural Imaging of Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

The incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) continues to grow especially as the population ages. The uncoordinated atrial activation and subsequent ineffective atrial contraction is a strong stimulus for left atrial (LA) thrombus formation especially in the LA appendage. AF is associated with increased risk of stroke, heart failure, and all-cause mortality. The presence of LA thrombus in AF portends a poor prognosis. Direct current cardioversion (DCCV) is the most effective method of restoring sinus rhythm and, with it there is relief of symptoms, improved LV filling, reversed atrial remodeling, and possibly reduced cardio-embolic risk. However, there are significant risks of systemic embolization following DCCV if LA thrombus is present. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an ideal non-invasive imaging modality to detect thrombus in the LA and especially in the LA appendage. Its proper use can lead to earlier DCCV for AF and improve safety of DCCV in AF. A key part of this strategy is proper use of anticoagulation therapy. This chapter illustrates the important role of TEE in patient evaluation and risk stratification prior to cardioversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fye WB. Tracing atrial fibrillation – 100 years. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1412–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chugh SS, Roth GA, Gillum RF, Mensah GA. Global burden of atrial fibrillation in developed and developing nations. Global Heart. 2014;9(1):113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) study. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285(18):2370–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang TS, Gersh BJ. Atrial fibrillation: an old disease, a new epidemic. Am J Med. 2002;113(5):432–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim MH, Johnston SS, Chu BC, Dalal MR, Schulman KL. Estimation of total incremental health care costs in patients with atrial fibrillation in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcome. 2011;4(3):313–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coyne KS, Paramore C, Grandy S, Mercader M, Reynolds M, Zimetbaum P. Assessing the direct costs of treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States. Values Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2006;9(5):348–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakili R, Voigt N, Kääb S, Dobrev D, Nattel S. Recent advances in the molecular pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(8):2955–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland Jr JC, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):e199–267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet. 2009;373(9658):155–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(13):1449–57.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113(5):359–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leung DY, Davidson PM, Cranney GB, Walsh WF. Thromboembolic risks of left atrial thrombus detected by transesophageal echocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(5):626–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lown BA, Neuman J. New method for terminating cardiac arrhythmias: use of synchronized capacitor discharge. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1962;182:548–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wazni OM, Tsao HM, Chen SA, Chuang HH, Saliba W, Natale A, et al. Cardiovascular imaging in the management of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(10):2077–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallagher MM, Guo XH, Poloniecki JD, Guan Yap Y, Ward D, Camm AJ. Initial energy setting, outcome and efficiency in direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(5):1498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elhendy A, Gentile F, Khandheria BK, Hammill SC, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, et al. Predictors of unsuccessful electrical cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(1):83–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fatkin D, Kuchar DL, Thorburn CW, Feneley MP. Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: evidence for “atrial stunning” as a mechanism of thromboembolic complications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(2):307–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein B, Halperin JL, Fuster V. Should patients with atrial fibrillation be anticoagulated prior to and chronically following cardioversion? Cardiovasc Clin. 1990;21(1):231–47; discussion 48–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grimm RA, Stewart WJ, Black IW, Thomas JD, Klein AL. Should all patients undergo transesophageal echocardiography before electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(2):533–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hansen ML, Jepsen RM, Olesen JB, Ruwald MH, Karasoy D, Gislason GH, et al. Thromboembolic risk in 16 274 atrial fibrillation patients undergoing direct current cardioversion with and without oral anticoagulant therapy. Europace. 2015;17:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss S, Davis D. Rheumatic heart disease: III. Embolic manifestations. Am Heart J. 1933;9(1):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Silvestry FE, Kerber RE, Brook MM, Carroll JD, Eberman KM, Goldstein SA, et al. Echocardiography-guided interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(3):213–31; quiz 316–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aschenberg W, Schluter M, Kremer P, Schroder E, Siglow V, Bleifeld W. Transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography for the detection of left atrial appendage thrombus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7(1):163–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fatkin D, Scalia G, Jacobs N, Burstow D, Leung D, Walsh W, et al. Accuracy of biplane transesophageal echocardiography in detecting left atrial thrombus. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77(4):321–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Manning WJ, Weintraub RM, Waksmonski CA, Haering JM, Rooney PS, Maslow AD, et al. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial thrombi. A prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123(11):817–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Olson JD, Goldenberg IF, Pedersen W, Brandt D, Kane M, Daniel JA, et al. Exclusion of atrial thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992;5(1):52–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Syed TM, Halperin JL. Left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: state of the art and current challenges. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4(8):428–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moore KL, Persaud TVN. The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003, xv, 560 p.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kanmanthareddy A, Reddy YM, Vallakati A, Earnest MB, Nath J, Ferrell R, et al. Embryology and anatomy of the left atrial appendage: why does thrombus form? Interv Cardiol Clin. 2014;3(2):191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, Bruce CJ, Glas KE, Lang RM, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):921–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Maltagliati A, Pepi M, Tamborini G, Muratori M, Celeste F, Doria E, et al. Usefulness of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in the recognition of artifacts and normal anatomical variants that may mimic left atrial thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ital Heart J Off J Ital Fed Cardiol. 2003;4(11):797–802.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Klein AL, Asher CR. Clinical echocardiography review: a self-assessment tool. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2011, xvii, 476 p.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Veinot JP, Harrity PJ, Gentile F, Khandheria BK, Bailey KR, Eickholt JT, et al. Anatomy of the normal left atrial appendage: a quantitative study of age-related changes in 500 autopsy hearts: implications for echocardiographic examination. Circulation. 1997;96(9):3112–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M, Mohanty P, Salvetti I, Gili S, et al. Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(6):531–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ernst G, Stollberger C, Abzieher F, Veit-Dirscherl W, Bonner E, Bibus B, et al. Morphology of the left atrial appendage. Anat Rec. 1995;242(4):553–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Brien J, Al-Hassan D, Ng J, Joshi M, Hague C, Chakrabarti S, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of left atrial appendage orifice geometry and potential implications for device closure. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30(4):819–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoit BD. Left atrial size and function: role in prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(6):493–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999;82(5):547–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Davis 3rd CA, Rembert JC, Greenfield Jr JC. Compliance of left atrium with and without left atrium appendage. Am J Physiol. 1990;259(4 Pt 2):H1006–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoit BD, Shao Y, Gabel M. Influence of acutely altered loading conditions on left atrial appendage flow velocities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24(4):1117–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Inoue S, Murakami Y, Sano K, Katoh H, Shimada T. Atrium as a source of brain natriuretic polypeptide in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Card Fail. 2000;6(2):92–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rodeheffer RJ, Naruse M, Atkinson JB, Naruse K, Burnett Jr JC, Merrill WH, et al. Molecular forms of atrial natriuretic factor in normal and failing human myocardium. Circulation. 1993;88(2):364–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Donal E, Yamada H, Leclercq C, Herpin D. The left atrial appendage, a small, blind-ended structure: a review of its echocardiographic evaluation and its clinical role. Chest. 2005;128(3):1853–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mugge A, Kuhn H, Nikutta P, Grote J, Lopez JA, Daniel WG. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(3):599–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tabata T, Oki T, Fukuda N, Iuchi A, Manabe K, Kageji Y, et al. Influence of left atrial pressure on left atrial appendage flow velocity patterns in patients in sinus rhythm. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1996;9(6):857–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shirani J, Alaeddini J. Structural remodeling of the left atrial appendage in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation: implications for thrombus formation, systemic embolism, and assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. Cardiovasc Pathol Off J Soc Cardiovasc Pathol. 2000;9(2):95–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61(2):755–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Stoddard MF, Dawkins PR, Prince CR, Ammash NM. Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(2):452–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Scherr D, Dalal D, Chilukuri K, Dong J, Spragg D, Henrikson CA, et al. Incidence and predictors of left atrial thrombus prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(4):379–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285(22):2864–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yarmohammadi H, Varr BC, Puwanant S, Lieber E, Williams SJ, Klostermann T, et al. Role of CHADS2 score in evaluation of thromboembolic risk and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing direct current cardioversion (from the ACUTE Trial Substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(2):222–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Berger M, Schweitzer P. Timing of thromboembolic events after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter: a retrospective analysis. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(12):1545–7, A8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Airaksinen KE, Gronberg T, Nuotio I, Nikkinen M, Ylitalo A, Biancari F, et al. Thromboembolic complications after cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation: the FinCV (Finnish CardioVersion) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(13):1187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jaber WA, Prior DL, Thamilarasan M, Grimm RA, Thomas JD, Klein AL, et al. Efficacy of anticoagulation in resolving left atrial and left atrial appendage thrombi: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. Am Heart J. 2000;140(1):150–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. You JJ, Singer DE, Howard PA, Lane DA, Eckman MH, Fang MC, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e531S–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Klein AL, Grimm RA, Murray RD, Apperson-Hansen C, Asinger RW, Black IW, et al. Use of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(19):1411–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Klein AL, Jasper SE, Katz WE, Malouf JF, Pape LA, Stoddard MF, et al. The use of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin for short-term antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing transoesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion: assessment of Cardioversion Using Transoesophageal Echocardiography (ACUTE) II randomized multicentre study. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(23):2858–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Stellbrink C, Nixdorff U, Hofmann T, Lehmacher W, Daniel WG, Hanrath P, et al. Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin and oral anticoagulants for prevention of thromboembolic complications in cardioversion of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the Anticoagulation in Cardioversion using Enoxaparin (ACE) trial. Circulation. 2004;109(8):997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task F, American Society of E, American Heart A, American Society of Nuclear C, Heart Failure Society of A, Heart Rhythm S, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(9):1126–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Grewal GK, Klosterman TB, Shrestha K, Yarmohammadi H, Zurick AO, Varr BC, et al. Indications for TEE before cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: implications for appropriateness criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5(6):641–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Sutherland GR, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation. 1991;83(3):817–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Transesophageal echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69(9):856–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hilberath JN, Oakes DA, Shernan SK, Bulwer BE, D’Ambra MN, Eltzschig HK. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(11):1115–27; quiz 220–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Quinones MA, Douglas PS, Foster E, Gorcsan 3rd J, Lewis JF, Pearlman AS, et al. ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine Task Force on Clinical Competence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(4):687–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Destounis A, Tzamouranis D. Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30(11):2074–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9689):534–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wheeler R, Masani ND. The role of echocardiography in the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2011;12(10):i33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Blackshear JL, Pearce LA, Hart RG, Zabalgoitia M, Labovitz A, Asinger RW, et al. Aortic plaque in atrial fibrillation: prevalence, predictors, and thromboembolic implications. Stroke. 1999;30(4):834–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Toyoda K, Yasaka M, Nagata S, Yamaguchi T. Aortogenic embolic stroke: a transesophageal echocardiographic approach. Stroke. 1992;23(8):1056–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Meissner I, Khandheria BK, Sheps SG, Schwartz GL, Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, et al. Atherosclerosis of the aorta: risk factor, risk marker, or innocent bystander? A prospective population-based transesophageal echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(5):1018–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Arboix A, Alio J. Cardioembolic stroke: clinical features, specific cardiac disorders and prognosis. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6(3):150–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. To AC, Gabriel RS, Park M, Lowe BS, Curtin RJ, Sigurdsson G, et al. Role of transesophageal echocardiography compared to computed tomography in evaluation of pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation (ROTEA study). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(9):1046–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Khariton Y, House JA, Comer L, Coggins TR, Magalski A, Skolnick DG, et al. Impact of transesophageal echocardiography on management in patients with suspected cardioembolic stroke. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(12):1912–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Garcia-Fernandez MA, Perez-David E, Quiles J, Peralta J, Garcia-Rojas I, Bermejo J, et al. Role of left atrial appendage obliteration in stroke reduction in patients with mitral valve prosthesis: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(7):1253–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Kanderian AS, Gillinov AM, Pettersson GB, Blackstone E, Klein AL. Success of surgical left atrial appendage closure: assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(11):924–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Katz ES, Tsiamtsiouris T, Applebaum RM, Schwartzbard A, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Surgical left atrial appendage ligation is frequently incomplete: a transesophageal echocardiograhic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(2):468–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Verhaert D, Puwanant S, Gillinov AM, Klein AL. Atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: how safe is early conversion without anticoagulation? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(2):212.e1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Merino A, Hauptman P, Badimon L, Badimon JJ, Cohen M, Fuster V, et al. Echocardiographic “smoke” is produced by an interaction of erythrocytes and plasma proteins modulated by shear forces. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(7):1661–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sigel B, Coelho JC, Spigos DG, Flanigan DP, Schuler JJ, Kasprisin DO, et al. Ultrasonography of blood during stasis and coagulation. Investig Radiol. 1981;16(1):71–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Black IW. Spontaneous echo contrast: where there’s smoke there’s fire. Echocardiography. 2000;17(4):373–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Castello R, Pearson AC, Fagan L, Labovitz AJ. Spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in the descending aorta. Am Heart J. 1990;120(4):915–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Goldman ME, Pearce LA, Hart RG, Zabalgoitia M, Asinger RW, Safford R, et al. Pathophysiologic correlates of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: I. Reduced flow velocity in the left atrial appendage (The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation [SPAF-III] study). J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12(12):1080–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zotz RJ, Muller M, Genth-Zotz S, Darius H. Spontaneous echo contrast caused by platelet and leukocyte aggregates? Stroke. 2001;32(5):1127–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mahony C, Ferguson J, Fischer PL. Red cell aggregation and the echogenicity of whole blood. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;18(6–7):579–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Kleemann T, Becker T, Strauss M, Schneider S, Seidl K. Prevalence of left atrial thrombus and dense spontaneous echo contrast in patients with short-term atrial fibrillation <48 hours undergoing cardioversion: value of transesophageal echocardiography to guide cardioversion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(12):1403–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Black IW, Hopkins AP, Lee LC, Walsh WF. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast: a clinical and echocardiographic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(2):398–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bashir M, Asher CR, Schaffer K, Murray RD, Apperson-Hansen C, Jasper SE, et al. Left atrial appendage spontaneous echo contrast in patients with atrial arrhythmias using integrated backscatter and transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88(8):923–7, A9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Donal E, Sallach JA, Murray RD, Drinko JK, Jasper SE, Thomas JD, et al. Contrast-enhanced tissue Doppler imaging of the left atrial appendage is a new quantitative measure of spontaneous echocardiographic contrast in atrial fibrillation. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2008;9(1):5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Klein AL, Murray RD, Black IW, Chandra S, Grimm RA, DS DA, et al. Integrated backscatter for quantification of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(1):222–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lowe BS, Kusunose K, Motoki H, Varr B, Shrestha K, Whitman C, et al. Prognostic significance of left atrial appendage “Sludge” in patients with atrial fibrillation: a new transesophageal echocardiographic thromboembolic risk factor. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:1176–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Seward JB, Khandheria BK, Oh JK, Freeman WK, Tajik AJ. Critical appraisal of transesophageal echocardiography: limitations, pitfalls, and complications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1992;5(3):288–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Troughton RW, Asher CR, Klein AL. The role of echocardiography in atrial fibrillation and cardioversion. Heart. 2003;89(12):1447–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Hajjiri M, Bernstein S, Saric M, Benenstein R, Aizer A, Dym G, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with known sludge in the left atrial appendage. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythmias Pacing. 2014;40(2):147–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Mizuguchi KA, Burch TM, Bulwer BE, Fox AA, Rizzo RJ, Shernan SK. Thrombus or bilobar left atrial appendage? Diagnosis by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(1):70–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Solomon SD, Bulwer BE. Essential echocardiography: a practical handbook with DVD. Totowa: Humana Press; 2007, xiv, 458 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  98. Nakajima H, Seo Y, Ishizu T, Yamamoto M, Machino T, Harimura Y, et al. Analysis of the left atrial appendage by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(6):885–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Khan GN, Dairywala IT, Liu Z, Li P, Carroll J, Vannan MA. Three-dimensional echocardiography of left atrial appendage thrombus. Echocardiography. 2001;18(2):163–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Karakus G, Kodali V, Inamdar V, Nanda NC, Suwanjutah T, Pothineni KR. Comparative assessment of left atrial appendage by transesophageal and combined two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2008;25(8):918–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Nucifora G, Faletra FF, Regoli F, Pasotti E, Pedrazzini G, Moccetti T, et al. Evaluation of the left atrial appendage with real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: implications for catheter-based left atrial appendage closure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(5):514–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. von der Recke G, Schmidt H, Illien S, Luderitz B, Omran H. Use of transesophageal contrast echocardiography for excluding left atrial appendage thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation before cardioversion. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(10 Pt 2):1256–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Yao SS, Ilercil A, Meisner JS, Strom JA, Shirani J. Improved Doppler echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage by peripheral vein injection of sonicated albumin microbubbles. Am Heart J. 1997;133(4):400–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Jung PH, Mueller M, Schuhmann C, Eickhoff M, Schneider P, Seemueller G, et al. Contrast enhanced transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation referred to electrical cardioversion improves atrial thrombus detection and may reduce associated thromboembolic events. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Fatkin D, Feneley M. Stratification of thromboembolic risk of atrial fibrillation by transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography: the relative role of left atrial appendage function, mitral valve disease, and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996;39(1):57–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Jue J, Winslow T, Fazio G, Redberg RF, Foster E, Schiller NB. Pulsed Doppler characterization of left atrial appendage flow. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1993;6(3 Pt 1):237–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Manning WJ, Silverman DI. Atrial anatomy and function postcardioversion: insights from transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996;39(1):33–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Handke M, Harloff A, Hetzel A, Olschewski M, Bode C, Geibel A. Left atrial appendage flow velocity as a quantitative surrogate parameter for thromboembolic risk: determinants and relationship to spontaneous echocontrast and thrombus formation – a transesophageal echocardiographic study in 500 patients with cerebral ischemia. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(12):1366–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Heppell RM, Berkin KE, McLenachan JM, Davies JA. Haemostatic and haemodynamic abnormalities associated with left atrial thrombosis in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Heart. 1997;77(5):407–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Antonielli E, Pizzuti A, Palinkas A, Tanga M, Gruber N, Michelassi C, et al. Clinical value of left atrial appendage flow for prediction of long-term sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(9):1443–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Uretsky S, Shah A, Bangalore S, Rosenberg L, Sarji R, Cantales DR, et al. Assessment of left atrial appendage function with transthoracic tissue Doppler echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2009;10(3):363–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Parvathaneni L, Mahenthiran J, Jacob S, Foltz J, Gill WJ, Ghumman W, et al. Comparison of tissue Doppler dynamics to Doppler flow in evaluating left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(8):1011–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Ono K, Iwama M, Kawasaki M, Tanaka R, Watanabe T, Onishi N, et al. Motion of left atrial appendage as a determinant of thrombus formation in patients with a low CHADS2 score receiving warfarin for persistent nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2012;10:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Kaya EB, Tokgozoglu L, Aytemir K, Kocabas U, Tulumen E, Deveci OS, et al. Atrial myocardial deformation properties are temporarily reduced after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and correlate well with left atrial appendage function. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Group Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol. 2008;9(4):472–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Providencia R, Faustino A, Ferreira MJ, Goncalves L, Trigo J, Botelho A, et al. Evaluation of left atrial deformation to predict left atrial stasis in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation – a pilot-study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Arslan S, Simsek Z, Gundogdu F, Aksakal E, Kalkan ME, Gurlertop Y, et al. Can left atrial strain and strain rate imaging be used to assess left atrial appendage function? Cardiology. 2012;121(4):255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Motoki H, Negishi K, Kusunose K, Popovic ZB, Bhargava M, Wazni OM, et al. Global left atrial strain in the prediction of sinus rhythm maintenance after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(11):1184–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Motoki H, Dahiya A, Bhargava M, Wazni OM, Saliba WI, Marwick TH, et al. Assessment of left atrial mechanics in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison between two-dimensional speckle-based strain and velocity vector imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(4):428–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. To AC, Flamm SD, Marwick TH, Klein AL. Clinical utility of multimodality LA imaging: assessment of size, function, and structure. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4(7):788–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Sallach JA, Puwanant S, Drinko JK, Jaffer S, Donal E, Thambidorai SK, et al. Comprehensive left atrial appendage optimization of thrombus using surface echocardiography: the CLOTS multicenter pilot trial. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(10):1165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Yamamoto M, Seo Y, Kawamatsu N, Sato K, Sugano A, Machino-Ohtsuka T, et al. Complex left atrial appendage morphology and left atrial appendage thrombus formation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(2):337–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thromboembolism in high-risk patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators Committee on Echocardiography. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(8):639–47.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Bernhardt P, Schmidt H, Hammerstingl C, Luderitz B, Omran H. Patients with atrial fibrillation and dense spontaneous echo contrast at high risk a prospective and serial follow-up over 12 months with transesophageal echocardiography and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(11):1807–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2093–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J, Yang S, Chernick M, Aikens TH, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation. 2011;123(2):131–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Piccini JP, Stevens SR, Lokhnygina Y, Patel MR, Halperin JL, Singer DE, et al. Outcomes after cardioversion and atrial fibrillation ablation in patients treated with rivaroxaban and warfarin in the ROCKET AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(19):1998–2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Flaker G, Lopes RD, Al-Khatib SM, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Tinga B, et al. Efficacy and safety of apixaban in patients after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: insights from the ARISTOTLE Trial (apixaban for reduction in stroke and other thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(11):1082–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Lip GYH, Merino J, Ezekowitz M, Ellenbogen K, Zamoryakhin D, Lanz H, et al. A prospective evaluation of edoxaban compared to warfarin in subjects undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: the EdoxabaN vs. warfarin in subjectS UndeRgoing cardiovErsion of Atrial Fibrillation (ENSURE-AF) study. Am Heart J. 2015:169:597–604

    Google Scholar 

  132. Dentali F, Riva N, Crowther M, Turpie AG, Lip GY, Ageno W. Efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Circulation. 2012;126(20):2381–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Adam SS, McDuffie JR, Ortel TL, Williams Jr JW. Comparative effectiveness of warfarin and new oral anticoagulants for the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(11):796–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Ntaios G, Papavasileiou V, Diener HC, Makaritsis K, Michel P. Nonvitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke. 2012;43(12):3298–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9921):955–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Bruins Slot KM, Berge E. Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD008980.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Salazar CA, del Aguila D, Cordova EG. Direct thrombin inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3:CD009893.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Cappato R, Ezekowitz MD, Klein AL, Camm AJ, Ma CS, Le Heuzey JY, et al. Rivaroxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for cardioversion in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3346–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the invaluable secretarial assistance of Marie Campbell.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan L. Klein MD, FRCP (C), FACC, FAHA, FASE .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

TEE-Guided Direct Current Cardioversion Cases

TEE-Guided Direct Current Cardioversion Cases

Case 1: Thrombus (Fig. 1.5a–g)

A 70 year-old woman presents to the emergency department with shortness of breath. She has a past medical history significant for hypertension, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and apical variant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. She states that she was in her usual state of health when she drifted off to sleep while watching TV. She woke up short of breath but denies any chest pain, fevers, or cough. She intermittently takes her heart failure medications, including her diuretic. She was taken by a family member to the emergency room, where on arrival, she was in respiratory distress, hypertensive, and tachycardic, with a blood pressure of 182/90 mmHg, heart rate of 126 beats per minute, and respiratory rate of 44 breaths per minute, with a oxygen saturation of 100 % on room air. Her initial exam as noted for irregular, tachycardic heart rate, bilateral crackles over her lung fields, and mild lower extremity edema. Her chest x-ray was consistent with pulmonary edema and her laboratory work-up was unremarkable, including negative cardiac enzymes, except for an elevated beta-naturetic pepitide level. Her ECG showed atrial fibrillation, which was a new diagnosis. She was started on a nitroglycerin infusion, placed on a non-invasive positive pressure ventilator (NIPPV), and given IV furosemide. With diuresis, she was quickly weaned off NIPPV and the nitroglycerin drip less than 24 h after presentation. Given her new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, she was also started on IV heparin with plan for TEE-guided DCCV.

Her TEE revealed severe SEC in her LA and LAA, which had a large primary lobe and smaller adjacent lobe. There was a large, mobile echodensity in the LAA, which prolapsed into the left atrium, which was consistent with thrombus. Her LAA peak emptying velocity was 38 cm/s. Of note, a TTE performed prior to her TEE showed spontaneous echocontrast but did not detect any thrombus in the LA.

Fig. 1.5
figure 5

(ag) Case of LAA thrombus (Case 1) (ad) demonstrate a large mobile echodensity within the primary lobe of the LAA that prolapses in the LA. (b) Depicts the simultaneous, multiplanar view of the thrombus. (e) Shows a 3D reconstruction of the thrombus. (f) Shows color flow around the thrombus, offering additional evidence that the echodensity was indeed thrombus and not an echo artifact. (g) Shows the erratic emptying velocities of the LAA in atrial fibrillation, with an emptying velocity of 38 cm/s

Her elective DCCV was canceled and she was bridged on IV heparin and started on warfarin therapy until her INR was >2. She was discharged with outpatient follow-up; at her clinic visit, she was noted to have self-converted into normal sinus rhythm. There were no obvious clinical manifestations of thromboembolism on history or physical exam.

Clinical Pearl

Regarding utilizing TTE to detect thrombus, the Comprehensive Left Atrial Appendage Optimization of Thrombus (CLOTS) multicenter pilot study demonstrated that TTE may be useful in detecting thrombus when utilizing harmonic imaging combined with IV echocontrast. In that study, LAA wall tissue Doppler velocities also correlated to the presence of sludge or thrombus (apical E velocity ≤9.7 cm/s, anterior S velocity ≤5.2 cm/s) [120]. TEE, however, remains the gold standard for LAA thrombus detection. While a majority of patients have a multilobular appendage, which has been shown to be independently associated with thrombus formation, 20 % of subjects in an autopsy study had a single lobe [34, 121]. Simultaneous multiplanar imaging can be essential in determine the lobular structure of the LAA and detecting possible thrombus.

Case 2: SEC/Sludge/Thrombus (Fig. 1.6)

A 69 year-old man presents to outpatient clinic with increasing fatigue. He has a past medical history significant for atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, congestive heart failure, and diabetes. He has a known non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular systolic ejection fraction of 20 %. He has an ICD that was placed for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. He has been compliant with his medications, including his warfarin for CVA prevention (CHADS2 risk score = 3, 5.9 %/year risk of thromboembolic event, CHA2DS2-VASc risk score = 4, 9.3 %/year risk of stroke) as well as his heart failure regimen. He was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation 6 months prior to presentation and underwent an uneventful TEE-guided cardioversion and was placed on dofetilide. However, his antiarrhythmic regimen was changed to amiodarone due to patient preference several months later. On exam, his vital signs were acceptable and he clinically appeared euvolemic with flat neck veins and no peripheral edema. His heart sounds were notable for an irregular rhythm; atrial fibrillation was confirmed on ECG. His INR was therapeutic at 2.3. On interrogation of his ICD, it was found that his atrial fibrillation burden was 2 %. There was concern that the loss of atrial kick or heart rate changes secondary to atrial fibrillation was worsening his heart failure symptoms, thus it was decided that the patient should have a TEE-guided DCCV.

His TEE revealed no left atrial appendage thrombus but the presence of severe spontaneous echo contrast (Fig. 1.6a–d).

Fig. 1.6
figure 6figure 6

(ad) Spontaneous echocontrast (Case 2) (ac) demonstrate severe echocontrast within the LAA but no LAA thrombus. Simultaneous multiplanar imaging was used to evaluate for possible thrombus. (d) Shows the SEC that appears within the lumen of the LAA in (d). (eh) Sludge (Case 2) (ef) demonstrate severe echocontrast within the LAA as well as layered sludge. (g) Shows that color flow Doppler to the apex of the LAA. (h) Shows reduced LAA emptying velocities. (ij) Thrombus (Case 2) (ij) demonstrate formation of a thrombus in the apex of the LAA. (j) Shows marking of the thrombus by the sonographer. Overall, the Figures in Case 2 highlight the progression of SEC to sludge to thrombus formation in a patient with LAA and low emptying velocities

He underwent successful DCCV and his heart failure was well controlled for 2 years; however, he again returned to clinic with increasing fatigue and was found to be back in atrial fibrillation. His INR again was therapeutic and he underwent a TEE for possible DCCV.

His TEE this time showed again showed severe SEC in the LAA with a peak emptying velocity of 16 cm/s. There is no thrombus, but a layer of sludge in the LAA (Fig. 1.6e–h).

Given the presence of sludge, the elective DCCV was canceled and patient was maintained on anticoagulation but subsequently was admitted to the hospital 3 weeks later in decompensated heart failure. Following stabilization of his volume status, he underwent interval TEE to evaluate whether he could again be converted to sinus rhythm.

His interval TEE now showed the presence of a LAA thrombus despite documented adequate anticoagulation between the echocardiographic studies. His elective DCCV was canceled and he remained on anticoagulation (Fig. 1.6i–j).

Clinical Pearl

SEC is seen in 50 % of patients with AF and in 2 % of patients with NSR. Furthermore, SEC was present in 90 % of patients with LAA thrombus. In a subgroup analysis of the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SPAF-III) trial, dense SEC was an independent predictor of thromboembolic events [122]. Furthermore, despite anticoagulant therapy, patients with AF and dense SEC have a high likelihood of cerebral embolism and/or death [123]. In a separate study, the presence of sludge has also been independently associated with thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality [92]. The decision to DCCV in the setting of dense SEC or sludge, however, is controversial and remains highly debated.

Case 3: NOAC Case (Fig. 1.7)

A 50-year old man with palpitations presented to clinic for evaluation. He has a past medical history for hypertension and diabetes. He denies any chest pain but describes an irregular heart rhythm most notable with activity but can occur at rest. He had a negative exercise stress test earlier in the year as part of an insurance physical exam. On physical exam, he has an irregular heart rhythm and no cardiac murmurs. An ECG confirms atrial fibrillation with a controlled rate. A TTE was performed that showed a mildly enlarged left atrium but no significant valvular abnormalities. He also had no metabolic dearrangement on laboratory testing, including normal renal function. He dislikes frequent blood tests; thus, after discussion of the risks and benefits with his physician, he is started on dabigatran for stroke prophylaxis. Following 3-weeks of anticoagulation, he presented for TEE-guided cardioversion for trial of sinus rhythm restoration.

Fig. 1.7
figure 7

(ac) NOACs (Case 3) (ac) demonstrate a bi-lobed LAA with no SEC, no sludge, and no thrombus after 3 weeks of anticoagulation with dabigatran, a NOAC. (c) Shows high LAA emptying velocities in AF, 61 cm/s

His TEE revealed a bilobed LAA with no SEC, no sludge, and no thrombus. Doppler of the LAA orifice revealed a fibrillatory patter with high emptying velocities (61 cm/s). He underwent successful DCCV without any immediate complications.

Clinical Pearl

A number of new non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been developed and approved for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran through the RE-LY trial [124], and factor Xa inhibitors: rivaroxaban through the ROCKET AF trial [125], apixaban through the ARISTOTLE trial [126], and edoxaban through the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial [127], have been shown to be non-inferior to conventional warfarin therapy for the prevention of embolic events in the setting of atrial fibrillation. Post-hoc, subgroup analyses of RE-LY, ROCKET AF, and ARISTOTLE, have similar shown at least non-inferiority of dabigatran [128], rivaroxaban [129], and apixaban [130] for embolic events compared to warfarin for subjects who underwent cardioversion. There is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE) trial currently enrolling that compares edoxaban to warfarin in subjects undergoing DCCV for AF [131]. Given the lack of direct head-to-head comparisons of the NOACs, it is not clear that a particular NOAC is superior. There have been several meta-analyses pooling the data from the NOAC-trials that have shown similar or lower rate of embolic events, major bleeding, and/or all-cause mortality with NOACs compared to warfarin [132137]. The results of these analyses and the convenience of no required monitoring (i.e. unlike blood draws for INR with warfarin) must be weighed against the lack of reversal agents and safety data to come with long-term use of these newer agents.

The current AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines recommend at least 3 weeks of anticoagulation before DCCV for AF ≥48 h in duration (or when duration is unknown); may proceed with DCCV sooner than 3 weeks of therapeutic anticoagulation if TEE is performed prior to DCCV to rule out LA thrombus [8]. In the cardioversion subgroup analyses of RE-LY (dabigatran), ROCKET-AF (rivaroxaban), and ARISTOTLE (apixaban), the patients had received long-term anti-coagulation (>3 weeks) at time of DCCV. In the Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation (X-VeRT) trial, the investigators prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus VKAs undergoing early (1–5 days of anticoagulation) versus delayed (3–8 weeks of anticoagulation) DCCV, with or without TEE-guidance [138]. While underpowered for statistical significance, the study showed similar incidence of adverse events in those receiving rivaroxaban versus VKAs in both the early and delayed cardioversion arms, suggesting that early DCCV with rivaroxaban may be comparable to the standard VKA paradigm. The current AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines do not specify the type of anticoagulation needed if proceeding with TEE-guided DCCV prior to achieving 3 weeks of anticoagulation.

Case 4: Artifact (Fig. 1.8)

A 72 year old woman was referred for another opinion regarding a left atrial appendage thrombus. She has a past medical history significant for severe aortic stenosis, atrial fibrillation s/p DCCV in the past and on chronic anticoagulation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, CAD, and a TIA. She is symptomatic from her severe AS with significant shortness of breath performing activities of daily living; however, due to her comorbidities, she was felt to be too high risk to undergo open heart surgery. She subsequently underwent a TEE for preoperative planning prior to possible transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) when she was reported to have a LAA thrombus. Her TAVR planning was halted, her anticoagulation was continued, and she was referred to another medical center for further evaluation.

Fig. 1.8
figure 8figure 8

(ah) Artifact (Case 4) (ab) demonstrate an echodensity in the middle of the LAA orifice that is concerning for possible thrombus. Of note, the echodensity is two times the distance from the warfarin ridge. (c) Demonstrates that simultaneous multiplanar imaging through the echodensity does not reveal any density in the perpendicular plane. (d) Shows that color flow does not respect the echodensity seen on 2D imaging. (e) Shows another multiplanar image of the same LAA from different angles does not reveal the same echodensity. (f) Shows a typical quadriphasic LAA emptying pattern in sinus rhythm, although the late diastolic emptying velocity is low at 21 cm/s. (gh) Show the use of echocontrast to confirm that the echodensity is reverberation artifact from the warfarin ridge due to the lack of a filling defect

She underwent a repeat TEE for further assessment of her left atrial appendage. An echodensity was visualized within the LAA between the membranous band of the left upper pulmonary vein and the LAA wall without any clear connection to the wall. It had a fully dependent motion with respect to the LAA and heart motion. Simultaneous multiplanar imaging, in addition to echocontrast, was utilized to confirm suspicions that the visualized density was an artifact from the warfarin ridge.

She underwent successful TAVR; of note, TEE at time of TAVR again confirmed the presence of a reverberation artifact within the LAA.

Clinical Pearl

Reverberation artifacts and pectinate muscles are often mistaken for LAA thrombi during TEE. In a series of patients undergoing TEE-guided DCCV, 23 % of patients had LAA artifacts. Reverberation artifacts from the warfarin ridge are located twice the distance from the transducer to the ridge, have a fully dependent motion with respect to the heart, and are morphologically consistent with the ridge. Thrombi have an independent motion, often-rounded morphology, attached to the LAA, often associated with SEC, and are distinct in echogenicity from the surrounding walls. Pectinate muscles are confined to the body of the LAA, have a fully dependent motion, and have the same echogenicity as the LAA walls. The use of echocontrast, simultaneous multiplanar imaging, and 3D techniques can help distinguish between true LAA thrombus, artifact, and intrinsic structures.

Case 5: LAA Exclusion (Fig. 1.9)

A 74 year old woman presented for TEE prior to anti-arrhythmic drug load (sotalol) for atrial fibrillation. She had a past medical history significant for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, interstitial lung disease, and atrial fibrillation. At the time of thoracic surgery for recurrent pleural effusions, her left atrial appendage was surgically oversewn with suture. She continued on anticoagulation therapy for stroke prophylaxis. She was admitted for anti-arrhythmic therapy due to symptomatic palpitations that was felt to be due to atrial fibrillation.

Fig. 1.9
figure 9

(ad) LAA surgical oversewing (Case 5) (ab) demonstrate formation of a thrombus (marked with an arrow) within a LAA that has been surgical oversewn. (cd) Demonstrate residual communication between the LAA and the LA. There is suggestion of thrombus formation in the LA where the LAA was surgical oversewn (marked with a + in a, c, d)

Her TEE showed a large mobile thrombus within the LAA with residual communication from the appendage to the LA. She was not started on anti-rhythmic therapy and a rate control strategy was adopted with continued anticoagulation.

Clinical Pearl

While the LAA is often surgically excised or excluded at time of concomitant thoracic surgery, multiple TEE studies have demonstrated flow between the LA and residual LAA [7678]. A study performed at the Cleveland Clinic reviewing 137 patients who had LAA closure and subsequent TEE evaluation, showed that only 55 of 137 (40 %) of closures were successful and that LAA thrombus was found in 41 % of patients with patent communication between the LA and LAA. From the study, it appeared that of the various LAA interventional techniques, surgical excision was more successful than exclusion (suture or stapler) [77]. With the advent to newer percutaneous LAA closure techniques, TEE evaluation of residual flow and/or thrombus formation should not be overlooked.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Min, D.B., Klein, A.L. (2016). Transesophageal Echocardiographic-Guided Cardioversion. In: Picard, M., Passeri, J., Dal-Bianco, J. (eds) Intraprocedural Imaging of Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29428-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29428-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29426-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29428-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics