Skip to main content

Water Decentralization Experiences: A Literature Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Governance Decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology ((BRIEFSWATER))

Abstract

As noted in Chap. 1, most of African countries have adopted integrated water resource management after the international conference on water and environment, which took place in Dublin in 1992. The implementation of the integrated water resource management has been different within the continent and even within the same region or country. This scenario has produced different results existing within the continent some good experiences while other countries and region are lagging behind. In order to understand the different forms of implementation of integrated water resource management, this chapter describes the process followed in different countries. The description is centered in the policies and other legal instrument enacted by the respective governments, and highlights the key success and failure histories and finally discuss in critical point of view the results obtained from different experiences during the implementation of integrated water resource management in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blomquist, W., Ballestero, M., Bhat, A., & Kemper, K (2005a). Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: The Tárcoles River basin, Costa Rica. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper #361, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, W., Haisman, B., Bhat, A., & Dinar, A. (2005b). Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: The Murray Darling river basin Australia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper #352, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, W., Calbick, K., & Dinar, A. (2005c). Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: The Fraser River basin, Canada. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper # 3525, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, W., Tonderski, A., & Dinar, A. (2005d). Institutional and policy analysis of river basin management: The Warata River basin, Poland. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper #352, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, W., Dinar, A., & Kemper, K. (2010). A framework for institutional analysis of decentralization reforms in natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 23(7), 620–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2010). Assuming too much? Participatory water resource governance in South Africa. The Geographical Journal, 177(2), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., Kemper, K., Blomquist, W., Diez, M., Sine, G., & Fru, W. (2005). Decentralisation of river basin management: A global analysis. The World Bank (Policy Research Working Paper 3637). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., Kemper, K., Blomquist, W., & Kurukulasuriya, P. (2007). Whitewater: Process and performance of decentralization reform of river basin water resource management. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29(6), 851–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dungumaro, E. W., & Madulu, N. F. (2003). Public participation in integrated water resources management: the case of Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28, 1009–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fesler, J. W. (1968). Centralization and decentralization. In D.L Sills, (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of the social sciences (pp. 370–379) New York: Macmillan and Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giné, R., & Perez-Fouguet, A. (2008). Sustainability assessment of national rural water supply program in Tanzania. Natural Resources Forum, 32, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, F., & Helao, T. (2008). Local governance and water resource management: Experiences from Northern Namibia. Public Administration and Development, 8(3), 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICWE. (1992). The Dublin Statement and Report of the Conference. International Conference on Water and the Environment, 26–31 January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambudzi, M. (1997). Water democracy or water development? A challenge in setting priorities. In B. Derman & C. Nhira (Eds.), Towards reforming the institutional and legal basis of the water sector in Zimbabwe (pp. 6–8). Harare: CASS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, K. E., Blomquist, W., & Dinar, A. (2007). Integrated river basin management through decentralization, World Bank and Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapedza, E., & Geheb, K. (2010). Power dynamics and water reform in the Zimbabwean context: Implication for the poor. Water Policy, 12, 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsinhe, N. P., Juizo, D., Macheve, B., & Dos Santos, C. (2008). Regulation of formal and informal water service providers in peri-urban areas of Maputo Mozambique. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 841–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mody, J. (2004). Achieving accountability through decentralization: Lessons for integrated river basin management. World bank Policy Research Working Paper 3346, Washington DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge, p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, O., & Baron, C. (2009). Integrated water resources management: From general principles to its implementation by the state. The case of Burkina Faso. Natural Resources Forum, 33, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. (2002). Operationalising the new Water Act: contributions from the Save the Sand Project-an integrated catchment management initiative. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27(11–22), 941–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. C. (1983). Decentralization: The territorial dimensions of the state. Boston: M.A George and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalgren, P. (2006). Worlds of water: Worlds apart. How targeted domestic actors transform international regimes. Göteborg Studies in Politics, Goteborg, Sweden, p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swatuk, L. A. (2005). Political challenges to implementing IWRM in Southern Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30, 872–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swatuk, L. A., & Rahm, D. (2004). Integrating policy, disintegrating practice: water resources management in Botswana. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 29, 1357–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zaag, P. (2004). Integrated Water Resources Management: Relevant concept or irrelevant buzzword or keynote speech, 5th annual meeting of the WaterNET/Warfsa, Windhoek, Namibia, 2–4 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Aid. (2008). Mali, pour un financement local efficace des services d’eau et d’assainissement, Water Aid Report, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joao Mutondo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mutondo, J., Farolfi, S., Dinar, A. (2016). Water Decentralization Experiences: A Literature Review. In: Water Governance Decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa. SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29422-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics