Abstract
In the previous chapters, we drew attention to the fact that not only do Muslims consider the Qurān as central to every aspect of their lives, but they also consider that the Qurān is both about Allah (God), and of God. In turn, not only does the Qurān address its messenger, the Prophet Muhammad, but it also speaks directly to all of humanity—thereby offering an intertwined message of particularity and universality; that is, Wa mā arsalnāka illā rahmatallil ‘ālamīn (We have not sent you [Muhammad] except as a Messenger unto all humanity). In analysing and considering the monotheistic and ethical paradigmatic foundations, we argued that the ethical application of Qurānic commands should not be oblivious of human interpretation and critical reflection (see Chap. 1), and hence, that religious ethics, more specifically Qurānic ethics, should always be subjected to critical thought processes and actions commensurate with what is morally justifiable. Following on this idea, we shift our focus onto those who lay claim to accepting and following the ethical guidelines of Islām. The noun ‘Muslim’ is derived from the Arabic verb aslama (to surrender oneself to a higher good; in this case, Allah Almighty). And, because Muslims consider Allah the Originator of their faith—that is, Islam as enunciated in the Qurān—Inna al-dīna ‘inda Allāhi al-Islām (Indeed the religion for Allah is Islam), it follows that enacting one’s role as a Muslim is synonymous with someone who adheres to the teachings of Islām—that is the Qurān and the Sunnah, as embodied in the life of the Prophet Muhammad. Consequently, it might make sense to assert that clarity on the conception of being Muslim is necessarily embedded in clarity of the Qurān and the Sunnah.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abu Zayd, N. (2004). Rethinking the Qur’an: Towards a humanistic hermeneutics. Utrecht: Humanistics University Press.
Abu Zayd, N. (2010). The Qur’an, Islam and Muhammad. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36, 281–294.
Al-Attas, M. N. (2005). Islam and secularism. Journal of Islamic Philosophy, 1, 11–43.
Arkoun, M. (1994). Rethinking Islam: Common questions, uncommon answers. Trans. R. D. Lee. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
Barlas, A. (2002). Believing women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Douglas, S. L. & Shaikh, M. A. (2004). Defining Islamic Education: Differentiation and Applications. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 7(1), 5–18.
Moosa, E. (2003). The debts and burdens of critical Islam. In O. Safi (Ed.), Progressive Muslims: On justice, gender and pluralism (pp. 111–127). Oxford: Oneworld Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2010). Islam in the modern world: Challenged by the west, threatened by fundamentalism, keeping faith with tradition. New York: HarperOne.
Rahman, F. (2009). Major themes of the Qur’ān (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Sardar, Z. (2014). Critical Muslims, transmodern tradition. Retrieved from www.halalmonk.com/ziauddin-sardar-critical-muslims-transmodern-tradition. [Accessed on 31 October 2015].
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davids, N., Waghid, Y. (2016). Qurānic Conceptions of Being Muslim. In: Ethical Dimensions of Muslim Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29317-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29317-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29316-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29317-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)