Skip to main content

Bubble Breakup

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bubble Systems

Part of the book series: Mathematical Engineering ((MATHENGIN))

  • 1471 Accesses

Abstract

The breakup of bubbles rising in gravity field is governed by one of the three mechanisms: breakup of bubbles due to instability of the interface surface, breakup due to centrifugal forces, and disintegration of bubbles due to the direct impact of turbulent pulsations during intensive bubbling. Mechanisms of wave formation and evolution on the liquid surface are considered in detail, both in the presence or absence of relative motion of phases. Formulas for the boundaries of the stable motion region are derived, as well as for the growth rate of perturbations, both for the Rayleigh–Taylor instability and for the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability. A new physical model of bubble breakup as a result of evolution of instability of the interface surface is put forward. Dependence is obtained for calculating the development time of the instability until the bubble breakup. This quantity is shown to be uniquely depending on the properties a two-phase system and the rate of initial perturbations. Contrary to a widespread opinion, the effect of the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability is shown to be practically always negligible in the process of breakup of bubbles rising in a large volume of still liquid. Formulas for determination the maximal size of a stable bubble in a mass bubbling condition are obtained. The agreement between theory and experiment is quite good. For moderate vapour holdups, the intensity of turbulent pulsations is shown to be governed by the effects in the wake of the rising bubble, and for large vapour holdups, by the universal equilibrium region of the energy spectrum of turbulent pulsations. A model of bubbles breakup due to centrifugal forces is developed. It is shown that the curvature radius of the bubble surface at the time of bubble breakup cannot be determined from the balance of the liquid inertia forces and the surface tension, as was done in previous studies. The agreement between the formula for the maximal size of a stable bubble thus obtained and experiment for elevated pressures is fairly good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The tangential stresses on the gas-liquid interface are practically zero, the term “shearing” does not seem quite appropriate in the context of the phenomenon under consideration.

  2. 2.

    All calculations from Fig. 10.7 were performed for low pressures, when \((\rho_{l} + \rho_{v} )/(\rho_{l} - \rho_{v} ) \approx 1\).

  3. 3.

    In the previous chapter it was shown that in the case of bubbling the velocity of a bubble with respect to a neighboring liquid \(w_{\infty }\) and the average velocity of rise motion of the gas phase with respect to the vessel walls \(\Delta w\) are different quantities, which as a rule differ by several times.

  4. 4.

    The velocities of these pulsations will be constant only in the case of homogeneous distribution of bubbles over sizes. In real conditions there will be a certain distribution of velocities that depends on the spectrum of bubble sizes.

  5. 5.

    In processing the data shown in Fig. 10.16 the last cofactor, which takes into account the ratio of the phases densities in formulas (10.97) and (10.101), was assumed to be unity. The error of this assumption was maximal for the data by Lin et al. (1998), which were obtained at pressure 3.5 MPa, and was found never to exceed 4 %.

  6. 6.

    In the original paper by Levich (1962) the quantity \(R_{cur}\) was defined in exactly this way, which resulted in not quite correct results.

References

  • Avdeev, A.A.: Laws of heat transfer in a bubbling bed. High Temp. 30(5), 801–809 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, G.K.: The stability of a gas bubble rising through liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 399–422 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, G.K.: An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clift, R., Grace, J.R., Weber, M.E.: Stability of bubbles in fluidized bed. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 13(1), 45–51 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckwer, W.D.: On the mechanism of heat transfer in bubble column reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 35, 1341–1346 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, J.R., Wairegi, T., Brophy, J.: Break-up of drops and bubbles in stagnant media. Can. J. of Chem. Eng. 56(2), 3–8 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, J.O.: Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mechanism of splitting dispersion processes. AIChE J. 25, 289–295 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitscha, J., Kocamustafaogullari, G.: Breakup criteria for fluid particles. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 15(4), 573–588 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Komabayasi, M., Gonda, T., Isono, K.: Lifetime of water drops before breaking and size distribution of fragment droplets. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan. 42, 330–340 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuntsov, D.A., Yagov, V.V.: Mechanics of Simple Gas-Liquid Structures. Izd. MEI (Moscow Power Energetic Univ. Publ.), Moscow (1978) (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr, F., Millies, M., Mewes, D.: Bubble-size distributions and flow fields in bubble columns. AIChE J. 48(11), 2426–2443 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levich, V.G.: Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.J.: The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their plans. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. A. 202, 81–96 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y., Lucas, D.: A literature review of theoretical models for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 64, 3389–3406 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T.-J., Tsuchia, K., Fan, L.-S.: Bubble flow characteristics in bubble columns at elevated pressure and temperature. AIChE J. 44(3), 545–560 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, H., Swendsen, H.F.: Theoretical model for drop and bubble breakup in turbulent dispersions. AIChE J. 42, 1225–1233 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Bazan, C., et al.: On the breakeup of an air bubble injected into fully developed turbulent flow. Part 1. Breakup frequency. J. Fluid Mech. 401, 157–182 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M.J., Blance, H.W.: Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns. AIChE J. 36, 1485–1499 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabha, S., Schubert, M., Wagner, M., et al.: Bubble size and radial gas hold-up distribution in a slurry bubble column using ultrafast electron beam X-ray tomography. AIChE J. 59(5), 1709–1722 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, C.P., Lage, P.L.C.: Experimental study on bubble size distributions in a direct-contact evaporators. Brasil J. Chem. Eng. 21(1), 69–81 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathe, M., Joshi, J., Evans, G.: Characteristics of turbulence in rectangular bubble column. Chem. Eng. Sci. 100, 52–68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G.I., Davies R.M.: The rate of rise of large volumes of gas in water. In: Underwater Explosions Research, vol. 2. Office of Naval Research, Washington (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Temperley, H.N., Chambers L.G.: The rate of rise of large volumes of gas in water. In: Underwater Explosions Research. Office of Naval Research. Washington. 2, 434 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Ge, W.: A theoretical bubble breakup model for slurry beds or three-phase fluidized beds under high pressure. Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 109–115 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander A. Avdeev .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avdeev, A.A. (2016). Bubble Breakup. In: Bubble Systems. Mathematical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29288-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29288-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29288-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics