Skip to main content

Existence, Uniqueness, and Comparative Statics in Contests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Equilibrium Theory for Cournot Oligopolies and Related Games

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Game Theory ((SSGT))

Abstract

Many important games are aggregative games which allows for robust comparative statics analysis even when the games do not exhibit strategic complements or substitutes (Acemoglu and Jensen, Games Econ Behav 81:27–49, 2013). This paper establishes such comparative statics results for contests improving upon existing results by (i) allowing payoff functions to be discontinuous at the origin, and (ii) allowing for asymmetric rent-seeking contests and patent races. A leading example where (i) is relevant is the classical Tullock contest (Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent-seeking. In: Buchanan JM, Tollison RD, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A&M Press, College Station, pp 97–112). The paper also studies existence and uniqueness of equilibria extending the results of Szidarovszky and Okuguchi (Games Econ Behav 18:135–140, 1997) and Cornes and Hartley (Econ Theory 26:923–946, 2005) to patent races.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This relationship is further elaborated on in Sect. 2, see also Nti (1997).

  2. 2.

    For a general discussion of aggregative games see Jensen (2010).

  3. 3.

    Note that strategy sets are assumed to be compact. This is for technical convenience. If one insists on having \(S_{i} = \mathbb{R}_{+}\), one can instead assume, for example, that for all \(s_{-i} \in \mathbb{R}_{+}^{I-1}\), π i (⋅ , s i ) strictly decreases for \(s_{i} \geq \bar{ s}_{i}\).

  4. 4.

    Note that Assumption 2 is implied by Assumption 1 when R = 0 (specifically, from the fact that h i is strictly increasing).

  5. 5.

    Use that \(\frac{\partial ^{2}c_{i}\circ h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i})} {\partial s_{i}^{2}} = \frac{c_{i}^{{\prime\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i}))(h_{i}^{{\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i})))^{-1}h_{i}^{{\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i}))-h_{i}^{{\prime\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i}))(h_{i}^{{\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i})))^{-1}c_{i}^{{\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i}))} {(h_{i}^{{\prime}}(h_{i}^{-1}(s_{i})))^{2}}\).

  6. 6.

    See statement 3 of Theorem 2 where conditions for z to be locally increasing/decreasing play an important role.

  7. 7.

    For the state-of-the-art in games that are not aggregative and also do not exhibit strategic complements see Roy and Sabarwal (2010) and Monaco and Sabarwal (2015).

  8. 8.

    Note that the payoff of an agent in Loury is in fact \(\frac{V } {R} \frac{h_{i}(s_{i})} {R+\sum _{j}h_{j}(s_{j})} - s_{i}\) (see equation (7) on page 399 of Loury (1979)). Multiplying with R—which does not alter the optimal decision—leads to the functional form considered here.

  9. 9.

    Some Cournot models of course fit directly into the set-up of the current paper. Thus with inverse demand \(P(Q) = \frac{1} {R+Q}\) and cost c i , firm i’s profit function is of the form (1) with h i (s i ) = s i and V i  = 1. Note, however, that this Cournot model is not a game of strategic substitutes (as one may show, firm i’s optimal output is decreasing in the opponents’ aggregate output if and only if \(s_{i} \leq R +\sum _{j\neq i}s_{j}\)).

References

  • Acemoglu D, Jensen MK (2013) Aggregate comparative statics. Games Econ Behav 81:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corchón L (2007) The theory of contests: a survey. Rev Econ Des 11:69–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornes R, Hartley R (2005) Asymmetric contests with general technologies. Econ Theory 26:923–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A (1987) Strategic behavior in contests. Am Econ Rev 77:891–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai S, Szidarovszky F (2013) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium in asymmetric contests with endogenous prizes. Int Game Theory Rev 15:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1989) Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: ratio vs. difference models of relative success. Public Choice 63:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MK (2010) Aggregative games and best-reply potentials. Econ Theory 43:45–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolmar M, Wagener A (2013) Inefficiency as a strategic device in group contests against dominant opponents. Econ Inq 51:2083–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukushkin NS (1994) A fixed-point theorem for decreasing mappings. Econ Lett 46:23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loury GC (1979) Market structure and innovation. Q J Econ 93:395–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco AJ, Sabarwal T (2015) Games with strategic complements and substitutes. Econ Theory (forthcoming Economic Theory)

    Google Scholar 

  • Novshek W (1985) On the existence of Cournot equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 52:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nti KO (1997) Comparative statics of contests and rent-seeking games. Int Econ Rev 38:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy S, Sabarwal T (2010) Monotone comparative statics for games with strategic substitutes. J Math Econ 46:793–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1970) Preispolitik der Mehrproduktenunternehmung in der Statischen Theorie. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas S (1996) Contest success functions. Econ Theory 7:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szidarovszky F, Okuguchi K (1997) On the existence and uniqueness of pure Nash equilibrium in rent-seeking games. Games Econ Behav 18:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent-seeking. In: Buchanan JM, Tollison RD, Tullock G (eds) Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. Texas A&M Press, College Station, pp 97–112

    Google Scholar 

  • von Mouche PHM, Yamazaki T (2015) Sufficient and necessary conditions for equilibrium uniqueness in aggregative games. J Nonlinear Convex Anal 16:353–364

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Pierre von Mouche, Federico Quartieri, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments. All remaining errors are my responsibility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kaae Jensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, M.K. (2016). Existence, Uniqueness, and Comparative Statics in Contests. In: von Mouche, P., Quartieri, F. (eds) Equilibrium Theory for Cournot Oligopolies and Related Games. Springer Series in Game Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29254-0_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics