Skip to main content

A User Trust Model for Automatic Decision-Making in Ubiquitous and Self-Adaptive Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems

Part of the book series: Autonomic Systems ((ASYS))

Abstract

Ubiquitous Environments are able to support users during their daily life by intelligently self-adapting to changed contexts. Examples include home automation systems which can support energy saving by switching off unused devices or public displays which enable users to present and interact with data, but maintain the users’ privacy by hiding sensible data if others pass by. However, such proactive adaptations could also cause frustration and thus harm the users’ acceptance and trust towards a system if they do not match the users’ preferences or are not self-explanatory. In the worst case, wrong or incomprehensible decisions by the system even could make the users abandon the system. To address this concern, we propose a generic trust-based model, called User Trust Model (UTM), which facilitates automatic decision-making in ubiquitous and self-adaptive environments. It is supposed to monitor users’ trust in the system and to select context-aware system actions that maintain, restore, or even foster user trust. In this chapter, the construction of the generic model as well as its integration into two case studies will be presented. We will provide a detailed description of how to customise the UTM for the respective scenarios and share results and experiences from various studies conducted with the developed systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://arduino.cc/

  2. 2.

    http://www.homematic.com/

References

  1. Rothrock, L., Koubek, R., Fuchs, F., Haas, M., Salvendy, G.: Review and reappraisal of adaptive interfaces: toward biologically inspired paradigms. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3, 47–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan, Z., Zhang, P., Vasilakos, A.V.: A survey on trust management for internet of things. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 42, 120–134 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Röcker, C., Hinske, S., Magerkurth, C.: Intelligent privacy support for large public displays. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2007, LNCS 4555. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International), 22–27 July 2007, Beijing International Conference Center, Beijing, pp. 198–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Theory: A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan, Z., Holtmanns, S.: Computer Security, Privacy and Politics: Current Issues, Challenges and Solutions, pp. 290–323. IGI Global, Hershey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marsh, S.: Trust in distributed artificial intelligence. In: 4th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-agent World, Artificial Social Systems, pp. 94–112. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, Y., Vassileva, J.: Bayesian network trust model in peer-to-peer networks. In: 2nd International Workshop on Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing, pp. 23–34. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 294–301. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vogiatzis, G., MacGillivray, I., Chli, M.: A probabilistic model for trust and reputation. In: 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 225–232. IFAA-MAS, Richland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jøsang, A., Hayward, R., Pope, S.: Trust network analysis with subjective logic. In: 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference, vol. 48, pp. 85–94. Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sankaranarayanan, V., Chandrasekaran, M., Upadhyaya, S.J.: Towards modeling trust based decisions: a game theoretic approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, pp. 485–500. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burnett, C., Norman, T.J., Sycara, K.P.: Trust decision-making in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI/AAAI), Barcelona, pp.115–120 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Msadek, N., Ungerer, T.: Trust as important factor for building robust self-x systems. In: Reif, W., Anders, G., Seebach, H., Steghöfer, J.-P., André, E., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C., Ungerer, T. (eds.) Autonomic Systems, vol. 7, pp. 151–181. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sherchan, W., Nepal, S., Paris, C.: A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Comput. Surv. 45, 47:1–47:33 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bhuiyan, T., Xu, Y., Jøsang, A.: A review of trust in online social networks to explore new research Agenda. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Internet Computing, pp. 123–128. CSREA Press, Las Vegas (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adali, S., Escriva, R., Goldberg, M.K., Hayvanovych, M., Magdon-Ismail, M., Szymanski, B.K., Wallace, W.A., Williams, G.T.: Measuring behavioral trust in social networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 150–152. IEEE, Piscataway (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ivanov, I., Vajda, P., Korshunov, P., Ebrahimi, T.: Comparative study of trust modeling for automatic landmark tagging. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 8, 911–923 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Donovan, J., Smyth, B.: Trust in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 167–174. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bickmore, T., Cassell, J.: Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 396–403. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glass, A., McGuinness, D.L., Wolverton, M.: Toward establishing trust in adaptive agents. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 227–236. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 46, 50–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Denko, M.K., Sun, T., Woungang, I.: Trust management in ubiquitous computing: a Bayesian approach. Comput. Commun. 34, 398–406 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arimura, S., Fujita, M., Kobayashi, S., Kani, J., Nishigaki, M., Shiba, A.: i/k-Contact: a context-aware user authentication using physical social trust. In: 12th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, Toronto, pp. 407–413 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cao, H., Olivier, P., Jackson, D.: Enhancing privacy in public spaces through cross-modal displays. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 26, 87–102 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Antifakos, S., Kern, N., Schiele, B., Schwaninger, A.: Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, pp. 9–14. ACM, Salzburg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lim, B.Y., Dey, A.K.: Toolkit to support intelligibility in context-aware applications. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Copenhagen, pp. 13–22. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cheverst, K., Byun, H., Fitton, D., Sas, C., Kray, C., Villar, N.: Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behaviour in an office environment control system. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 15, 235–273 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hochleitner, C., Graf, C., Unger, D., Tscheligi, M.: Making devices trustworthy: security and trust feedback in the Internet of things. In: 4th International Workshop on ‘Security and Privacy in Spontaneous Interaction and Mobile Phone Use’ at Pervasive’12, Newcastle (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Steghöfer, J.-P., Kiefhaber, R., Leichtenstern, K., Bernard, Y., Klejnowski, L., Reif, W., Ungerer, T., André, E., Hähner, J., Müller-Schloer, C.: Trustworthy organic computing systems: challenges and perspectives. In: Autonomic and Trusted Computing, pp. 62–76. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bee, K., Hammer, S., Pratsch, C., André, E.: The automatic trust management of self-adaptive multi-display environments. In: Khalil, I., Mantoro, T. (eds.) Trustworthy Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 6, pp. 3–20. Atlantis Press, Amsterdam (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Lumsden, J.: Triggering trust: to what extent does the question influence the answer when evaluating the perceived importance of trust triggers? In: Proceedings of the 2009 British Computer Society Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 214–223. British Computer Society, Swinton (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach 2nd International. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Wißner, M., Hammer, S., Kurdyukova, E., André, E.: Trust-based decision-making for the adaptation of public displays in changing social contexts. Journal of Trust Management. 1, 1–23 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kurdyukova, E., Bee, K., André, E.: Friend or Foe? Relationship-based adaptation on public displays. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ambient Intelligence, pp. 228–237. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Greenberg, S., Marquardt, N., Ballendat, T., Diaz-Marino, R., Wang, M.: Proxemic interactions: the new Ubicomp? ACM Interact. 18, 42–50 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Leichtenstern, K., Bee, N., André, E., Berkmüller, U., Wagner, J.: Physiological measurement of trust-related behavior in trust-neutral and trust-critical situations. In Proceedings of the 5th IFIP International Conference on Trust Management, pp. 165–172. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kurdyukova, E., André, E., Leichtenstern, K.: Trust management of ubiquitous multi-display environments. In: Krueger, A., Kuflik, T. (eds.) Ubiquitous Display Environments, pp. 177–193. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Knijnenburg, B.P., Kobsa, A., Jin, H.: Dimensionality of information disclosure behavior. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71, 1144–1162 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L.F.: Privacy indexes: a survey of Westin’s studies. Technical report, CMU-ISRI-5-138. Institute for Software Research International, Carnegie Mellon University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partly sponsored by the research unit OC-Trust (FOR 1085) of the German Research Foundation.

The authors would like to thank Karin Bee and Ekaterina Kurdyukova for their contributions to the work presented in this chapter.

The core of our implementation is based on the SMILE reasoning engine and the networks shown in this chapter were created using the GeNIe modelling environment. Both SMILE and GeNIe are developed and contributed to the community by the Decision Systems Laboratory, University of Pittsburgh and available at http://genie.sis.pitt.edu/.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Hammer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hammer, S., Wißner, M., André, E. (2016). A User Trust Model for Automatic Decision-Making in Ubiquitous and Self-Adaptive Environments. In: Reif, W., et al. Trustworthy Open Self-Organising Systems. Autonomic Systems. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29201-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29201-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29199-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29201-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics