Skip to main content

Preserving Sexual Function and Continence during Radical Hysterectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Functional Urologic Surgery in Neurogenic and Oncologic Diseases

Abstract

Cervical cancer is, after breast cancer, the second highest worldwide female malignancy. The incidence has been increasing gradually over recent years, with younger patients resulting affected. Thus, it is becoming one of the most deadly cancer globally [1–4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li H, Jia J, Xiao Y, Kang L, Cui H. Anatomical basis of female pelvic cavity for nerve sparing radical Hysterectomy. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37:657–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dursun P, Leblanc E, Nogueira MC. Radical vaginal trachelectomy (Dargent’s operation): a critical review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:933–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morice P, Castaigne D. Advances in the surgical management of invasive cervical cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morrow CP. Morrow’s gynecologic cancer surgery. Surgery for Cervical Neoplasia. Encinitas, CA: South Coast Medical Publishing; 2013. p. 513–698.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sankaranarayanan R, Thara S, Esmy PO, et al. Cervical cancer: screening and therapeutic perspectives. Med Princ Pract. 2008;17:351–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim HS, Kim K, Ryoo S-B, Seo JH, Kim SY, Park JW, Kim MA, Hong KS, Jeong CW, Song YS, On behalf of FUSION Study Group. Conventional versus nerve-sparing radical surgery for cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015;2(26):100–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ditto A, Martinelli F, Borreani C, Kusamura S, Hanozet F, Brunelli C, et al. Quality of life and sexual, bladder, and intestinal dysfunctions after class III nerve-sparing and class II radical hysterectomies: a questionnaire-based study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:953–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim HS, Choi CH, Lim MC, Chang SJ, Kim YB, Kim MA, et al. Safe criteria for less radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter clinicopathologic study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1973–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suh DH, Kim JW, Kang S, Kim HJ, Lee KH. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2013. J Gynecol Oncol. 2014;25:236–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi SY, Lee KH, Suk HJ, Chae HD, Kang BM, Kim CH. Successful pregnancy by direct intraperitoneal insemination in an infertile patient with failure of recanalization of isthmic stenosis after laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57:82–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Panici PB. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48:287–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G, Maher K, Potkul R, Barter J, et al. Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1991;42:116–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:180–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningsohn L, Steineck G. Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pieterse QD, Ter Kuile MM, Deruiter MC, Trimbos JB, Kenter GG, Maas CP. Vaginal blood flow after radical hysterectomy with and without nerve sparing. A preliminary report. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:576–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson KS, Naik R. Pelvic floor dysfunction and radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:354–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aoun F, van Velthoven R. Lower urinary tract dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:947–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Plotti F, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Sansone M, Altavilla T, Antonelli E, Montera R, Damiani P, Benedetti Panici P. Update on urodynamic bladder dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;80:323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burnstock G, Milner P, O’Brien B. Autonomic nervous system. In: Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Ferguson MWJ, editors. Grays anatomy. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 1292–311.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sangwan YP, Solla JA. Internal anal sphincter: advances and insights. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(10):1297–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Landoni F, Maneo A, Cormio G, et al. Class II versus Class III radical hysterectomy in stage Ib–IIa cervical cancer: a prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:3–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, Zanaboni F, Solima E, Spatti G, et al. Type II versus type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:256–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hockel M, Horn LC, Fritsch H. Association between the mesenchymal compartment of uterovaginal organogenesis and local tumour spread in stage Ib–IIb cervical carcinoma: a prospective study [J]. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:751–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Hanozet F, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: evolution of concepts. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:119–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44(2):265–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):297–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fujii S. Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(2 Suppl):S33–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, Tanaka N. Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17(5):1172–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maas CP, Kenter GG, Trimbos JB, Deruiter MC. Anatomical basis for nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: immunohistochemical study of the pelvic autonomic nerves. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(9):868–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Possover M, Quakernack J, Chiantera V. The LANN technique to reduce postoperative functional morbidity in laparoscopic radical pelvic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:913–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hőckel M, Horn L-C, Hentschel B, Hőckel S, Naumann G. Total mesometrial resection: high resolution nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy based on developmentally defined surgical anatomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003;13:791–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y. A new perspective on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: nerve topography and over-preservation of the cardinal ligament. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003;33:589–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y, Nakajima T. Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77:155–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, Fanfani F, Villet R, Paparella P, Mancuso S, Scambia G. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25:200–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sakuragi N, Todo Y, Kudo M, Yamamoto R, Sato T. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:389–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Kitamura S. Dissection of the cardinal ligament in radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer with emphasis on the lateral ligament. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:7–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Samlal RAK, van der Velden J, Ketting BW, et al. Disease-free interval and recurrence pattern after the Okabayashi variant of Wertheim’s radical hysterectomy for stage Ib and IIa cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1996;6:120–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Magrina JF, Goodrich M, Weaver A, Podratz KC. Modified radical hysterectomy: morbidity and mortality. Gynaecol Oncol. 1995;59:277–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Covens A, Rosen B, Gibbons A, et al. Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynaecological oncologists. Gynaecol Oncol. 1993;51:39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Massi G, Savino L, Susini T. Three classes of radical vaginal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial and cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1576–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Axelsen SM, Bek KM, Petersen LK. Urodynamic and ultrasound characteristics of incontinence after radical hysterectomy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:794–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Laterza RM, Salvatore S, Ghezzi F, Serati M, Umek W, Koelbl H. Urinary and anal dysfunction after laparoscopic versus laparotomic radical hysterectomy. Eur J Obst Gyn Clin Reprod Biol. 2015;194:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. De Groat WC, Kawatani M. Reorganization of sympathetic preganglionic connections in cat bladder ganglia following parasympathetic denervation. J Physiol. 1989;49:431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Griffenberg L, Morris M, Atkinson N, Levenback C. The effect of dietary fibre on bowel function following radical hysterectomy: a randomized trial. Gynaecol Oncol. 1997;66:417–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Vierhout ME, Schreuder HWB, Veen HF. Severe slow transit constipation following radical hysterectomy. Gynaecol Oncol. 1993;51:401–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Sood A, Nygaard I, Shahin MS, Sorosky JI, Lutgendorf SK, Rao SSC. Anorectal dysfunction after surgical treatment for cervical cancer. Am Coll Surg. 2002;4:513–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Loizzi V, Cormio G, Lobascio PL, Marino F, De Fazio M, Falagario M, Leone L, Difiore G, Scardigno D, Selvaggi L, Altomare DF. Bowel dysfunction following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective study. Oncology. 2014;86:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yeoh E, Sun WM, Russo A, Ibanez L, Horowitz M. A retrospective study of the effects of pelvic irradiation for gynaecological cancer on anorectal function. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35:1003–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang W, Li B, Zuo J, Zhang G, Yang Y, Zeng H, et al. Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:696–701.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wells GA, Shea B, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2014. [cited 2015 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Soligo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Landoni, F., Zanagnolo, V., Soligo, M. (2016). Preserving Sexual Function and Continence during Radical Hysterectomy. In: Carbone, A., Palleschi, G., Pastore, A., Messas, A. (eds) Functional Urologic Surgery in Neurogenic and Oncologic Diseases. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29191-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29191-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29189-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29191-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics