Skip to main content

IMF Programmes and Institutional Quality Determinants: Economic Scenarios in Pakistan

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Economic Impact of International Monetary Fund Programmes

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 656 Accesses

Abstract

Pakistan has been selected in this chapter as a representative example of a frequent user of IMF resources. Here, by applying the Vector Autoregression (VAR) model techniques, various counterfactual scenarios are estimated for a period of 1980–2014, to see impact of a significant institutional determinant (from Chap. 2), KOF index of globalization on macroeconomic instability and real economic growth. Results highlight that through enhanced focus on institutional quality determinants, macroeconomic instability can be reduced, and hence higher growth rate of GDP can be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to IEO (2002, p. 9 and 24) a country is considered to be a prolonged user if during a decade it remains for at least seven years in an IMF programme.

  2. 2.

    http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/aa/pdf/aa.pdf

  3. 3.

    https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/eff.htm

  4. 4.

    ‘Inclusive economic institutions’ on the other hand, work towards and facilitate participation of people in economic activity. Moreover, an inclusive/extractive economic institution results because of an inclusive/extractive political institutional setup (Acemoglu and Robinson 2012, pp. 74–82; Acemoglu 2006; Acemoglu and Robinson 2008).

  5. 5.

    In such a situation, welfare of one person can only be increased by decreasing someone else's welfare (Groenewegen et al. 2010, p. 16).

  6. 6.

    SROs are special instructions from the Federal Board of Revenue (federal tax collection authority in Pakistan). These instructions/rules are in addition to the annual budget, are brought into effect without taking parliamentary approval, and are in principal for a limited time period.

  7. 7.

    As to how much an asset is relevant and needed for a particular kind of transaction, in terms of how much it will lose its value if it has to be put to use for another kind of transaction (Groenewegen et al. 2010, p. 369).

  8. 8.

    https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/download.aspx

  9. 9.

    For details, see Ismihan (2003, pp. 214–215), who constructed MII.

  10. 10.

    It may be indicated here that while Ismihan (2003) only included the first four indicators to construct the MII, the current study augments it with one more indicator.

  11. 11.

    https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/01/weodata/download.aspx

  12. 12.

    Data source is State Bank of Pakistan (http://www.sbp.org.pk/) and Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan (http://finance.gov.pk/survey_1314.html). Also, data on fiscal deficit is taken instead of budget deficit due to availability of data in this format for Pakistan.

  13. 13.

    Data source is State (or central) Bank of Pakistan (SBP; http://www.sbp.org.pk/).

  14. 14.

    Data taken from IFS CD ROM (IMF).

  15. 15.

    http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicator

  16. 16.

    From Chap. 3, it can be seen that in IMF programme countries, determinants of institutional quality have an overall negative impact on MII. Moreover, Acemoglu et al. (2003) pointed out that the main reason behind macroeconomic instability and the varying levels of macroeconomic volatility among different countries were related more with institutional reasons than the traditionally identified macroeconomic determinants. Similarly, better budgetary institutions (which are important economic institutions) had a negatively significant impact on (budget) deficit (von Hagen 1991). Note: for details on VAR and SVARs, see Chap. 5, ‘Multiequation time-series models’ of Walter Enders (2015).

  17. 17.

    I have employed ER in VAR model, but simulation analysis is based on ERV.

  18. 18.

    See White (1980) for details.

  19. 19.

    Calculation on the basis of various issues of Pakistan’s Economic Survey (http://www.finance.gov.pk/).

References

  • Acemoglu D (2006) A simple model of inefficient institutions. Scand J Econ 108:515–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S (2005) Unbundling institutions. J Polit Econ 113:949–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2001) A theory of political transitions. Am Econ Rev 91:938–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2006) De facto political power and institutional persistence. Am Econ Assoc 96:325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2008) Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. Am Econ Rev 98:267–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2012) Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty, 1st edn. Crown Business, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J, Thaicharoen Y (2003) Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: volatility, crises and growth. J Monet Econ 50:49–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso A, Jalles JT (2011) Economic performance and government size. ECB working paper series No. 1399, ECB, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad E, Mohammed A (2012) Pakistan, the United States and the IMF: great game or a curious case of Dutch disease without the oil? Asia Research Centre working paper no 57. London School of Economics, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke B (1986) Alternative explorations of the money-income correlations. In K Brunner, AH Meltzer (eds) Real business cycles, real exchange rates, and actual policies. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy No. 25, pp 123–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard OJ, Quah D (1989) The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. Am Econ Rev 79:655–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun PA, Mittnik S (1993) Misspecifications in vector autoregressions and their effects on impulse responses and variance decompositions. J Econ 59:319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR (1931) Institutional economics. Am Econ Rev 21:648–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley TF, LeRoy SF (1985) Atheoretical macroeconomics: a critique. J Monet Econ 16(3):283–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch R (1976) Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. J Polit Econ 84:1161–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders W (2015) Applied econometric time series, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Garratt AK, Lee MHP, Shin Y (1998) A long run structural macroeconometric model of the UK, Department of Applied Economics Working Paper. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewegen J, Spithoven A, van den Berg A (2010) Institutional economics: an introduction, 1st edn. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafer RW, Sheehan RG (1991) Policy inference using VAR models. Econ Inq 29:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi AK, Sameti M, Isfahani RD (2012) The effect of macroeconomic instability on economic growth in Iran. Res Appl Econ 4(3):9–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain I (1999) Pakistan: the economy of an elitist state, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Karachi

    Google Scholar 

  • IEO/IMF (2002) Report of the Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) on prolonged use of IMF resources. IMF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismihan M (2003) The role of politics and instability and public spending dynamics and macroeconomic performance: theory and evidence from Turkey, PhD thesis. METU, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemal AR (2003) Institutional change, growth, and poverty levels in Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev 42:299–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan MS, Knight MD (1985) Fund supported adjustment programs and economic growth. IMF Occasional papers No. 41. IMF, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Khawaja MI, Khan S (2009) Reforming institutions: where to begin? Pakistan Inst Dev Econ Work Pap 50:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Khawaja I, Khan S (2011) Predation, institutional quality and economic growth. Pak Dev Rev 50:809–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick T (1995) IMF programmes in developing countries: design and effects, 1st edn. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leamer EE (1985) Vector autoregressions for causal inference? Carn-Roch Ser Public Policy 22:255–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Libecap GD (1989) Distributional issues in contracting for property rights. J Inst Theor Econ 145:6–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H (1991) Introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1994) Economic performance through time. Am Econ Rev 84:359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Oge Guney P (2007) Fiscal theory of exchange rate determination: empirical evidence from Turkey. Econ Bull 5:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Polak JJ (1957) Monetary analysis of income formation and payments problems. IMF Staff Pap 6:1–50, IMF, Washington, DC

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1986) Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis? Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Q Rev 10:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA (1992) Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: the effects of monetary policy. Eur Econ Rev 36:975–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA, Stock JH, Watson MW (1990) Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots. Econometrica 58:113–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hagen J (1991) A note on the empirical effectiveness of formal fiscal restraints. J Public Econ 44:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek FA (1979) The counter-revolution of science. Studies on the abuse of reason, 2nd edn. Liberty Press, Indianapolis, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4.6 Comparison of actual and historically simulated figures
Table 4.7 Comparison of actual and stochastically simulated figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Javed, O. (2016). IMF Programmes and Institutional Quality Determinants: Economic Scenarios in Pakistan. In: The Economic Impact of International Monetary Fund Programmes. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29178-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics