Advertisement

Topical Approach: Gender Discrimination as CSR Problem

  • Christina Keinert-Kisin
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Carroll’s model on its own has not been able to satisfy demands that CSR should not remain vague as a theoretical concept. In order to fill the concept with greater meaning, theoretically, it could be enhanced with a concrete selected problem of social responsibility. In combination with the existing general theoretical model, this approach may be able to shed further light on what concrete corporate responsibilities in this topical domain organizations have, but also what obstacles may hinder the realization of these responsibilities—a question the general model has not been able to make statements on. The infringement perspective in the CSR theoretical model also promises to yield information on “neuralgic” points and potentially effective leverage to improved CSR. When one considers the existing CSR definitions’ common denominators, they reveal strong frequencies of “economic” and “social” dimensions in their definitions. From the theoretical perspective taken here, it is troubling also the “voluntarism” dimension yields almost equally high frequencies. It is hoped with the arguing of a concrete CSR topic against a strong existing theoretical backdrop, it can be demonstrated the frequent “voluntarism” dimension is in fact incompatible with what is here understood as “core”—normatively backed—social responsibilities.

Keywords

Sexual Harassment Equal Treatment National Court Gender Discrimination Female Manager 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristoteles (author), Fuhrmann M (ed), Gigon O (translator) (1998) Die Nikomachische Ethik8, Deutscher Taschenbuch VerlagGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard C (2006) EC employment law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Dijkstra AG (1997) Gender and economics: a European perspective. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Eagly AH (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: a social role interpretation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer P, Köck HF, Karollus MM (2002) Europarecht4. Linde, WienGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilligan C (1982) In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development, vol 326. Harvard University Press, HarvardGoogle Scholar
  7. Helgeson S (1990) The female advantage: women’s ways of leadership. Doubleday/Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Kanter RM (1993) Men and women of the corporation: new edition. Basic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Menke C, Raimondi F (eds) (2011) Die Revolution der Menschenrechte. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Öhlinger T, Eberhard H (2012) Verfassungsrecht9. WUV/Facultas, WienGoogle Scholar
  11. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (2003) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Robinson DA (2003) A legal and ethical handbook for ending discrimination in the workplace. Paulist, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  13. Vinnicombe S, Singh V, Burke RJ, Bilimoria D, Huse M (eds) (2009) Women on corporate boards of directors: international research and practice. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  14. Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) (1986) Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  15. Abbott WFM, Monsen RJ (1979) On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Acad Manag J 22:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Adams SM, Flynn PM (2005) Local knowledge advances women’s access to corporate boards. Corp Govern 13(6):836–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Adler NJ (1993) Competitive frontiers: women mangers in the triad. Int Stud Manag Organ 23(2):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Akaah IP (1989) Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals. J Bus Ethics 8(5):375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ancona D, Caldwell D (1992) Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organ Sci 3:21–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Anonymous (2004a) Despite women’s gains in business, their representation on America’s corporate barlely improves. Women Manag Rev 19(1/2):130Google Scholar
  22. Anonymous (2006) Horizontal direct effect—a law of diminishing coherence? Common Market Law Rev 43(1):1–8, Editorial CommentsGoogle Scholar
  23. Antal AB, Krebsbacher-Gnath C (1993) Women in management in Germany: east, west, and reunited. Int Stud Manag Organ 23(2):49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ashford S, Rothbard N, Piderit S, Dutton J (1998) Out on a limb: the role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Adm Sci Q 43:23–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Azoulai L (2008) The court of justice and the social market economy: the emergence of an ideal and the conditions for its realization. Common Market Law Rev 45:1335–1356Google Scholar
  26. Bantel KA, Jackson SE (1989) Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strateg Manag J 10:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Barmes L (2007) Constitutional and conceptual complexities in UK implementation of the EU harassment provisions. Ind Law J 36(4):446–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Barnett JH, Karson MJ (1989) Managers, values, and executive decisions: an exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. J Bus Ethics 8(10):747–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Barrett G (2006a) Shall i compare thee to…? On article 141 EC and Lawrence (European developments). Ind Law J 35(1):93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Barrett B (2006b) Vicarious liability for harassment by an employee—Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS trust. Ind Law J 35:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Becker B, Gerhart B (1996) The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: progress and prospects. Acad Manag J 39(4):779–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Bell M (2002) Beyond European labour law? reflections on the EU racial equality directive. Eur Law J 8(3):384–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Beltramini RF, Peterson RA, Kozmetsky G (1984) Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. J Bus Ethics 3(3):195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Betz M, O’Connell L, Shepard JM (1989) Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behaviour. J Bus Ethics 8(5):321–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Beu DS, Buckley MR, Harvey MG (2003) Ethical decision-making: a multidimensional construct. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 12(1):88–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Bilimoria D (1997) A qualitative comparison of the boardroom experiences of U.S. and Norwegian women corporate directors. Int Rev Women Leadersh 3(2):63–76Google Scholar
  37. Bilimoria D, Piderit SK (1994) Board committee membership: effects of sex-based bias. Acad Manag J 37(6):1453–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Bishop JW, Scott KD, Burroughs SM (2000) Support, commitment and employee outcomes in a team environment. J Manag 26:1113–1132Google Scholar
  39. Brammer S, Millington A, Pavelin S (2007) Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corp Govern 15(2):393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Browning J, Zabriskie NB (1983) How ethical are industrial buyers? Ind Market Manag 12(4):219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Burgess Z, Tharenou P (2002) Women board directors: characteristics of the few. J Bus Ethics 37:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Burke RJ (1997) Women in corporate management. J Bus Ethics 16:873–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Burke R (2000) Company size, board size, and the numbers of women corporate directors. In: Burke R, Mattis M (eds) Women on corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Burke RJ (2003) Women on corporate boards of directors: the timing is right. Women Manag Rev 18(7):346–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Burrows N, Robison M (2007) An assessment of the recast of community equality laws. Eur Law J 13(2):186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Butz CE, Lewis PV (1996) Correlation of gender-related values if independence and relationship and leadership orientation. J Bus Ethics 15:1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Card RF (2005) Individual responsibility within organizational contexts. J Bus Ethics 62:397–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34(4):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Carroll AB (1999) Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Bus Soc 38(3):268–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2003a) Corporate governance, board diversity and firm value. Financ Rev 39:33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Cassell C (1997) The business case for equal opportunities: implications for women in management. Women Manag Rev 12(1):11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Charpentier L (1998) The European court of justice and the rhetoric of affirmative action. Eur Law J 4(2):167–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Chonko LB, Hunt SD (1985) Ethics and marketing management: an empirical examination. J Bus 13:339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Chyna JT (2001) Mirroring your community: a good reflection on you. Healthc Exec 16(2):18–23Google Scholar
  55. Clarke L, Frydental Pedersen E, Michielsens E, Susman B (2005) The European social construction partners: gender equality in theory and practice. Eur J Ind Relat 11(2):151–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Connolly M (2001a) Discrimination law: justification, alternative measures and defences based on sex—Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College. The Ind Law J 30(3):311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Connolly M (2001b) The sex discrimination (indirect discrimination and burden of proof) regulations 2001 (si 2001 no 2260) (recent legislation). Ind Law J 30(4):375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Cooper Jackson J (2001) Women middle managers’ perception of the glass ceiling. Women Manag Rev 16(1):30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Costello C, Davies G (2006) The case law of the court of justice in the field of sex equality since 2000. Common Market Law Rev 43(6):1567–1616Google Scholar
  60. Crain KA, Heischmidt KA (1995) Implementing business ethics: sexual harassment. J Bus Ethics 14(4):299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Cross C (2006) Barriers to advancing female careers in the high-tech sector: empirical evidence from Ireland. Women Manag Rev 21(1):28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Cunningham N (2006) Discrimination through the looking-glass: judicial guidelines on the burden of proof (recent cases commentary). Ind Law J 35(3):279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. D’Aquila JM (2001) Financial accountants’ perceptions of management’s ethical standards. J Bus Ethics 31(3):233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Dawson LM (1997) Ethical differences between men and women in the sales profession. J Bus Ethics 16(11):1143–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Delaney JT, Huselid MA (1996) The Impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Acad Manag J 39(4):949–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Di Torella EC (2005) The goods and services directive: limitations and opportunities. Fem Leg Stud 13:337–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Dobbin F, Jung J (2011) Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: the competence gap or institutional investor bias? N C Law Rev 89(3):809–838Google Scholar
  69. Dobbins GH, Platz SJ (1986) Sex differences in leadership: how real are they? Acad Manag Rev 11(1):118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Donnell SM, Hall J (1980) Men and women as managers: a significant case of no significant difference. Organ Dyn 8(4):60–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Dutheil de la Rochère J (2004) The EU and the individual: fundamental rights in the draft constitutional treaty. Common Market Law Rev 41:345–354Google Scholar
  72. Eagly AH, Johnson BT (1990) Gender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 108(2):233–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Eagly AH, Karau SJ, Makhijani MG (1995) Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 117:125–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ekin MGS, Tezölmez SH (1999) Business ethics in Turkey: an empirical investigation with special emphasis on gender. J Bus Ethics 18(1):17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ellis KM, Keys PY (2003) Stock returns and the promotion of workforce diversity. Working paper, University of DelawareGoogle Scholar
  76. Ellison L (2001) Senior management in chartered surveying: where are the women? Women Manag Rev 15(5/6):264–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Adm Sci Q 46(2):229–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Erhardt NL, Werbel JD, Shrader CB (2003) Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corp Govern 11(2):102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Erkut S, Kramer VW, Konrad AM (2009) Critical mass: does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? In: Vinnicombe S et al (eds) Women on corporate boards of directors: international research and practice. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 350–366Google Scholar
  80. Eyring A, Stead BA (1998) Shattering the glass ceiling: some successful corporate practices. J Bus Ethics 17:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Fagenson EA, Jackson JJ (1993) The status of women managers in the United States. Int Stud Manag Organ 23(2):93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Fama EF, Jensen M (1983) Agency costs and residual claims. J Law Econ 26:327–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Fawcett R, Pringle JK (2000) Women CEOs in New Zealand: where are you? Women Manag Rev 15(5/6):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Feldberg RL, Glenn EN (1979) Male and female: job versus gender models in the sociology of work. Soc Probl 26(5):524–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Fenwick GD, Neal DJ (2001) Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gend Work Organ 8(2):205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Ferrell OC, Skinner SJ (1988) Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. J Market Res 25(1):103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Foote D (2001) The question of ethical hypocrisy in human resource management in the U.K. and IRISH charity sectors. J Bus Ethics 34:25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Forshaw S, Pilgerstorfer M (2005) Illegally formed contracts of employment and equal treatment at work (recent cases commentary). Ind Law J 34(2):158–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Forster N (2000) A case study of women academics’ views on equal opportunities, career prospects and work-family conflicts in a British university. Women Manag Rev 15(7):316–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Fowler JL, Gudmundsson AJ, O’Gorman JG (2007) The relationship between mentee-mentor gender combination and the provision of distinct mentoring functions. Women Manag Rev 22(8):666–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Frederick WC (1994) From CSR1 to CSR2—the maturing of business and society thought. Bus Soc 33(2):150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Galea C, Wright B (1999) Sex, roles and justice: a study of gender as a predictor of fairness in decision making. Women Manag Rev 14(3):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Gill T, Monaghan K (2003) Justification in direct sex discrimination law: taboo upheld. Ind Law J 32(2):115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Granleese J (2004) Occupational pressures in banking: gender differences. Women Manag Rev 19(4):219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Hall-Taylor B (1997) The construction of women’s management skills and the marginalization of women in senior management. Women Manag Rev 12(7):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Hambrick DC, Cho TS, Chen MJ (1996) The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Adm Sci Q 41(4):659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Hammond V, Holton V (1993) The scenario for women managers in Britain in the 1990s. Int Stud Manag Organ 23(2):71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Hartarskaa V, Nadolnyak D (2012) Board size and diversity as governance mechanisms in community development loan funds in the USA. Appl Econ 44:4313–4329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Hartly K (2004) The expatriate career transition, and women managers’ experiences. Women Manag Rev 19(1/2):40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Haslam SA, Ryan MK (2008) The road to the glass cliff: differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadersh Q 19(5):530–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Haslam SA, Ryan MK, Kulich C, Trojanowski G, Atkins C (2010) Investing with prejudice: the relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. Br J Manag 21:484–497Google Scholar
  102. Heaton CAN, McWhinney G (1999) Women in management: the case of MBA graduates. Women Manag Rev 14(4):136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Heilman ME, Block CJ, Martell RF, Simon MC (1989) Has anything changed? current characterizations of men, women, and managers. J Appl Psychol 74(6):935–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Hellerstein JK, Neumark D, Troske KR (2002) Market forces and sex discrimination. J Hum Resour 37(2):353–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Herring C (2009) Does diversity pay?: race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Am Sociol Rev 74(2):208–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Hillman AJ, Shropshire C, Cannella AA (2007) Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Acad Manag J 50(4):941–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Hoffman L, Maier N (1961) Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62:401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Women Manag Rev 25(1):121–140Google Scholar
  109. Hollander EP (1992) The essential interdependence of leadership and followership current directions. Psychol Sci 1(2):71–75Google Scholar
  110. Hosmer LT (1994) Strategic planning as if ethics mattered. Strateg Manag J 15(S2):17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Hosmer LT (1995) Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):379–403Google Scholar
  112. Hosmer LT (1996) 5 years, 20 issues, 141 articles, and what? Bus Ethics Q 3:325–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Howard E (2008) The European year of equal opportunities for all—2007: is the EU moving away from a formal idea of equality? Eur Law J 14(2):168–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Jackson SE (1992b) Team composition in organizational settings: issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In: Worchel S et al (eds) Group process and productivity. Sage, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  115. Jackson SE, Joshi A, Erhardt NL (2003) Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. J Manag 29:801–830Google Scholar
  116. Jacobs FG (2004) The evolution of the European legal order. Common Market Law Rev 41:303–316Google Scholar
  117. Jaffee S, Hyde JS (2000) Gender differences in moral orientation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 126(5):703–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Jamali D, Safieddine A, Daouk M (2006) The glass ceiling: some positive trends from the Lebanese banking sector. Women Manag Rev 21(8):625–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Jamali D, Safieddine A, Daouk M (2007) Corporate governance and women: an empirical study of top and middle women managers in the Lebanese banking sector. Corp Govern 7(5):574–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. James G (2007) Law’s response to pregnancy/workplace conflicts: a critique. Fem Leg Stud 15:167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Jehn K, Mannix E (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad Manag J 44:238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Jehn K, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Adm Sci Q 44(4):741–763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Jensen MC, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs sand ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Jones TM, Gautschi FH (1988) Will the ethics of business change? A survey of future executives. J Bus Ethics 7(4):231–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Jones SK, Hiltebeitel KM (1995) Organizational influence in a model of the moral decision process of accountants. J Bus Ethics 14(6):417–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Kang H, Cheng M, Gray SJ (2007) Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corp Govern 15(2):194–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Kaptein M (2004) Business codes of multinational firms: what do they say? J Bus Ethics 50:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Karnes RE (1995) A change in business ethics: the impact on employer-employee relations. J Bus Ethics 14(5):397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Kent RN, McGrath NE (1969) Task and group characteristics as factors influencing group performance. J Exp Soc Psychol 5:429–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Keys PY, Turner PA, Friday SS (2002) Shareholder benefits of diversity. Working paperGoogle Scholar
  131. Kidwell JM, Stevens RE, Bethke AL (1987) Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: myth or reality? J Bus Ethics 6(6):489–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Kirchmeyer C (1995) Demographic similarity to the work group: a longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage. J Organ Behav 16:67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Kirchmeyer C (2002) Gender differences in managerial careers: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J Bus Ethics 37(2):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Klamert M (2006) Judicial implementation of directives and anticipatory indirect effect: connecting the dots. Common Market Law Rev 43(5):1251–1275Google Scholar
  135. Kochan T, Bezrukova K, Ely R, Jackson S, Joshi A, Jehn K, Leonard J, Levine D, Thomas D (2003) The effects of diversity on business performance: report of the diversity research network. Hum Resour Manag 42(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Kohlberg L, Hersh RH (1977) Moral development: a review of the theory. Theor Pract 16(2):53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Kolpin VW, Singell LD (1996) The gender composition and scholarly performance of economics department: a test for employment discrimination. Ind Lab Relat Rev 49(3):408–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Konrad AM, Mangel R (2000) The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strateg Manag J 21(12):1225–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Lado AA, Wilson MC (1994) Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective. Acad Manag Rev 19(4):669–727Google Scholar
  140. Lane JC (1995) Ethics of business students: some marketing perspectives. J Bus Ethics 14(7):571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Lane N, Crane A (2002) Revisiting gender role stereotyping in the sales profession. J Bus Ethics 40(2):121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Lefkowitz J (1994) Sex-related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: now you see them…. Acad Manag J 37(2):323–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Leighton DSR (2000) Making boards work: recruiting for balance, competence and results. In: Burke RJ, Mattis MC (eds) Women on corporate boards of directors: international challenges and opportunities. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Lemons MA, Parzinger MJ (2001) Designing women: a qualitative study of the glass ceiling for women in technology. Adv Manag J 66(2):4–11Google Scholar
  145. Leonard JS, Levine DI, Joshi A (2004) Do birds of a feather shop together? The effects on performance of employees’ similarity with one another and with customers. J Organ Behav 25:731–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Leung SM, Westwood RI (1994) The female expatriate manager experience: coping with gender and culture. Int Stud Manag Organ 24(3):64–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Lückerath-Rovers M (2013) Women on boards and firm performance. J Manag Govern 17(2):491–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Lund DB (2008) Gender differences in ethics judgment of marketing professionals in the United States. J Bus Ethics 77:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Luthar HK, DiBattista RA, Gautschi T (1997) Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: the role of gender, academic status, and ethical education. J Bus Ethics 16:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Maclagan P (1996) The organization context for moral development: questions of power and access. J Bus Ethics 15(6):645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Maclean M (1999) Corporate governance in France and the UK: long-term perspectives on contemporary institutional arrangements. Bus Hist 41(1):88–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Marshall J (1993) Working at senior management and board levels: some of the issues for women. Women Manag Rev 10(3):21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Mason ES, Mudrack PE (1996) Gender and ethical orientation: a test of gender and occupational socialization theories. J Bus Ethics 15(6):599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Masselot A (2004) The new equal treatment directive: plus ça change. Fem Leg Stud 13(2):152–168Google Scholar
  155. Masselot A (2007b) The state of gender equality law in the European union. Eur Law J 13(2):152–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Mavin S (2001) Women’s career in theory and practice: time for change? Women Manag Rev 16(4):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Mavin S (2006) Venus Envy 2: sisterhood, queen bees and female misogyny in management. Women Manag Rev 21(5):349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. McCabe C, Ingram R, Conway DM (2006) The business of ethics and gender. J Bus Ethics 64(2):101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. McCormick Hyland MA, Marcellino PA (2004) Examining gender on corporate boards: a regional study. Corp Govern 2(4):24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. McGlynn C (2000) Ideologies of motherhood in European community sex equality law. Eur Law J 6(1):29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. McNichols CW, Zimmerer TW (1985) Situational ethics: an empirical study of differentiators of student attitudes. J Bus Ethics 4(3):175–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Metz I (2003) Individual, interpersonal, and organisational links to women’s advancement in management in banks. Women Manag Rev 18(5):236–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Millns S (2007) Gender equality, citizenship, and the EU’s constitutional future. Eur Law J 13(2):218–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Münch R (2008) Constructing a European society by jurisdiction. Eur Law J 14(5):519–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Murnighan JK, Conlon DE (1991) The dynamics of intense work groups: a study of British string quartets. Adm Sci Q 36:165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Murphy SA, McIntyre ML (2007) Board of director performance: a group dynamics perspective. Corp Govern 7(2):209–2224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Murray AI (1989) Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 10:125–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Nemeth C (1986) Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychol Rev 93:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Nemeth CJ, Kwan JL (1985) Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. Soc Psychol Q 48:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Neubaum DO, Mitchell MS, Schminke M (2004) Firm newness, entrepreneurial orientation, and ethical climate. J Bus Ethics 52:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Ng ESW, Burke RJ (2004) Cultural values as predictors of attitudes towards equality and diversity: a Canadian experience. Women Manag Rev 19(5/6):317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Noble C, Mears J (2000) The impact of affirmative action legislation on women working in higher education in Australia: progress or procrastination? Women Manag Rev 15(8):404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. O’Brien C (2008) Case Law: C-212/05 Gertraut Hartmann v. Freistaat Bayers, C-213/05 Wendy Geven v. Land Nordrhein-Westfalen, C-287/05 D.P.W. Hendrix v. Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen. Common Market Law Rev 45:499–514Google Scholar
  174. O’Regan P, O’Donnell D, Kennedy T, Bontis N, Cleary T (2004) Board composition, non-executive directors and governance cultures in Iris ICT firms: a CFO perspective. Corp Govern 5(4):56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. O’Reilly CA III, Williams KY, Barsade S (1998) Group demography and innovation: does diversity help? composition. Res Manag Groups Teams 1:183–207Google Scholar
  176. Oakley JG (2000) Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. J Bus Ethics 76:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Paulson Gjerde KA (2002) The existence of gender-specific promotion standards in the U.S. Manag Decis Econ 23(8):447–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict and performance. Adm Sci Q 44(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  179. Peterson CA, Philpot J (2007) Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 Boards: director expertise and committee memberships. J Bus Ethics 72(2):177–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Pinkston TS, Carroll AB (1996) A retrospective examination of CSR orientations: have they changed? J Bus Ethics 15:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Powell GN (1990) One more time: do female and male managers differ? Acad Manag Exec 4:68–75Google Scholar
  182. Radtke RR (2000) The effects of gender and setting on accountants’ ethically sensitive decisions. J Bus Ethics 24(4):299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Reich N (2007) Horizontal liability in EC law: hybridization of remedies for compensation in case of breaches of EC rights. Common Market Law Rev 44:705–742Google Scholar
  184. Richard OC (2000) Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: a resource-based view. Acad Manag J 43:164–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Rindfleish J, Sheridan A (2003) No change from within: senior women managers’ response to gendered organizational structures. Women Manag Rev 18(5/6):299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Robertson CJ, Crittenden WF, Brady MK, Hoffman JJ (2002) Situational ethics across borders: a multicultural examination. J Bus Ethics 38(4):327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. Robin D, Babin L (1997) Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: a critical analysis and extension. Bus Ethics Q 7(4):61–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Robinson G, Deschant K (1997) Building a business case for diversity. Acad Manag Exec 11:21–31Google Scholar
  189. Rose C (2007) Does female board representation influence firm performance? the Danish evidence. Corp Govern 15(2):404–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Rosener JB (1990) Ways women lead. Harv Bus Rev 68(6):119–125Google Scholar
  191. Roxas ML, Stoneback JY (2004) The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. J Bus Ethics 50:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Ruegger D, King EW (1992) A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. J Bus Ethics 11(3):179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Ruigrok W, Peck S, Tacheva S (2007) Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss Corporate Boards. Corp Govern 15(4):546–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. Ryan MK, Haslam SA (2005) The glass cliff: evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. Br J Manag 16:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Kulich C (2010) Politics and the glass cliff: evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats. Psychol Women Q 34:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Samuels H (2004) A defining moment: a feminist perspective on the law of sexual harassment in the workplace in the light of the equal treatment amendment directives. Fem Leg Stud 12:181–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Schein VE (2007) Women in management: reflections and projections. Women Manag Rev 22(1):6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Pers Psychol 40(3):437–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Serwinek PJ (1992) Demographic and related differences in ethical views among small businesses. J Bus Ethics 11:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Sheridan A (2001) A view from the top: women on the boards of public companies. Corp Govern 1(1):8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Sheridan A, Milgate G (2003) She says, he says: women’s and men’s views of the composition of boards. Women Manag Rev 18(3/4):147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Shrader C, Blackburn V, Iles P (1997) Women in management and firm value: an exploratory study. J Manag Issues 9:355–372Google Scholar
  203. Singh V, Vinnicombe S (2003) The 2002 female FTSE index and women directors. Women Manag Rev 18(7):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Singh V, Vinnicombe S, Johnson P (2001) Women directors on top UK boards. Corp Govern 9(3):206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Singh V, Vinnicombe S, James K (2006b) Constructing a professional identity: how young female managers use role models. Women Manag Rev 21(1):67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Smith PL, Oakley EF III (1997) Gender-related differences in ethical and social values of business students: implications for management. J Bus Ethics 16(1):37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Smith N, Smith V, Verner M (2006) Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. Int J Product Perform Manag 55(7):569–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Sridhar BS, Camburn A (1993) Stages of moral development of corporations. J Bus Ethics 12:727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Stedham Y, Yamamura JH, Beekun RI (2007) Gender differences in business ethics: justice and relativist perspectives. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 16(2):163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Stuart P (1992) What does the glass ceiling cost you? Pers J 71(11):70–80Google Scholar
  211. Szwajkowski E, Larwood L (1991) Rational decision processes and sex discrimination: testing “rational” bias theory. J Organ Behav 12(6):507–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In: Worchel S, Austin WG (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations2. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CAGoogle Scholar
  213. Terjesen S, Sealy R, Singh V (2009) Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corp Govern 17(3):320–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Thanacoody PR, Bartram T, Barker M, Jacobs K (2006) Career progression among female academics: a comparative study of Australia and Mauritius. Women Manag Rev 21(7):536–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Thomas DA, Ely RD (1996) Making differences matter: a new paradigm for managing diversity. Harv Bus Rev Sept–Oct:79–90Google Scholar
  216. Thomsen S, Rose C (2004) The impact of corporate reputation on performance: some Danish evidence. Eur Manag J 22:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Thorne L, Saunders SB (2002) The socio-cultural embeddedness of individuals’ ethical reasoning in organizations (cross-cultural ethics). J Bus Ethics 35(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Timmerman TA (2000) Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance. Small Group Res 31:592–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Townsend AM, Scott KD (2001) Team racial composition, member attitudes, and performance: a field study industrial relations. J Econ Soc 40(2):317–337Google Scholar
  220. Tsui AS, Gutek BA (1984) A role set analysis of gender differences in performance, affective relationships, and career success of industrial middle managers. Acad Manag J 27(3):619–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Tsui AS, Egan TD, O’Reilly CA (1992) Being different: relational demography and turnover in top management groups. Adm Sci Q 37(4):549–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Van der Boon M (2003) Women in international management: an international perspective on women’s way of leadership. Women Manag Rev 18(3):132–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Van der Walt N, Ingley C (2003a) Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corp Govern 11(3):218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Van der Walt N, Ingley C (2003b) Board configuration: building better boards. Corp Govern 3(4):5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Van der Walt N, Ingley C, Shergill GS, Townsend A (2006) Board configuration: are diverse boards better boards. Corp Govern 6(2):129–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Van Marrewijk M (2003) Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion. J Bus Ethics 44:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Vinnicombe S, Singh V (2003) Locks and keys to the boardroom. Women Manag Rev 18(5/6):325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad Manag J 36:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. Webb J (1997) The politics of equal opportunity. Gend Work Organ 4(3):159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Weeks WA, Moore CW, McKinney JA, Longenecker JG (1999) The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgement. J Bus Ethics 20:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. Wentling RM (2003) The career development and aspirations of women in middle management—revisited. Women Manag Rev 18(5/6):311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Whipple TW, Swords DF (1992) Business ethics judgments: a cross-cultural comparison. J Bus Ethics 11(9):671–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  233. Williams K, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: a review of 40 years of research. In: Staw B, Cummings LL (eds) Research organisational behavior. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 77–140Google Scholar
  234. Wood GJ (2006) Career advancement in Australian middle managers: a follow-up study. Women Manag Rev 21(4):277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. Wood GJ, Lindorff M (2001) Sex differences in explanations for career progress. Women Manag Rev 16(4):152–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  236. Wright P, Ferris SP, Hiller JS, Kroll M (1995) Competitiveness through management of diversity: effects on stock price valuation. Acad Manag J 38:272–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. Zahra S, Stanton W (1988) The implications of board of directors’ composition for corporate strategy and performance. Int J Manag 5:261–272Google Scholar
  238. Adams RB, Ferreira D. Gender diversity in the boardroom. ECGI—Finance Working Paper #57/2004: social science research network—tomorrow’s research today, November 2004. http://ssrn.com/abstract=594506
  239. Alvarez RM, McGaffery EJ (2000) Is there a gender gap in fiscal political preferences? Social science research network—tomorrow’s research today. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=240502
  240. Brown D, Brown D, Anastasopoulos V (2002) Women on boards: not just the right thing … But the “bright” thing, report, 341-02: The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa. www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=374
  241. Carter D, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2003b) Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value, Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=344042
  242. Carter D, D’Souza FP, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG (2008) The diversity of corporate board committees and financial performance. Working paper, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1106698
  243. Catalyst (2003a) Women in US corporate leadership: 2003. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/93/women-in-us-corporate-leadership-2003
  244. Catalyst (2007a) 2006 catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the fortune 500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/18/2006-catalyst-census-of-women-corporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fortune-500
  245. Catalyst (2007d) 2007 catalyst census of women board directors of the fortune 500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/12/2007-catalyst-census-of-women-board-directors-of-the-fortune-500
  246. European Commission (2007) Tackling multiple discrimination—practices, policies, and laws. http://ec.europa.eu/ewsi/UDRW/images/items/docl_8256_617026509.pdf
  247. Friedman M (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13 September, to be retrieved in a version commented by Craig P. Dunn at http://www.ethicsinbusiness.net/case-studies/the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to-increase-its-profits/
  248. Lazear. Globalization and the market for teammates, NBER Working Paper No. 6579, issued in May 1998. http://www.nber.org/papers/w6579
  249. Valentine S, Godkin L, Turner JH (2002) Women’s management, perceived job responsibility, and job search intention. Women Manag Rev 17(1):29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  250. Cox T (1994) Cultural diversity in organizations: theory, research and practice. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  251. Korac-Kakabadse N (2001) Editorial: from glass ceilings to global nomads: what difference to equity and access for women. Women Manag Rev 16(3):104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. Davidson, MJ, Burke, RJ (2000) Women in management: current research issues volume ii. 2, Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  253. Burke RJ (1994) Women on corporate boards of directors: views of Canadian chief executive officers. Women Manag Rev 9(5):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. Farrell KA, Hersch PL (2005) Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. J Corporate Finance 11:85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. Singh V, Vinnicombe S, Kumra S (2006a) Women in formal corporate networks: an organisational citizenship perspective. Women Manag Rev 21(6):458–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Keinert-Kisin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations