Advertisement

Persistence of Gender Discrimination in the Workplace

  • Christina Keinert-Kisin
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Discrimination, today a negatively connoted behaviour, in its Latin origin stands for “division” or “differentiation”. Political and social sciences and legal practice understand discrimination in the contemporary sense as a disadvantageous, unfavorable or adverse treatment of an individual based on membership in a social group rather than on individual character, talent, merit or performance. For unfavorable treatment to be considered discrimination, a relatively privileged comparator is needed as benchmark. Unmerited privilege for some coincides with unjust disadvantage for others. Discrimination may be inflicted with or without intent and works as a mechanism of social exclusion. In the organizational context, gender discrimination may be expressed in rules, practices, processes or any other type of organizational and individual behaviors that disadvantage individuals of one gender compared with members of the other gender. Discrimination in the workplace is of course not limited to gender. It can happen on a variety of other grounds such as race, ethnicity, religion or belief, age, sexual orientation, beauty or weight, some of which are outlawed, some are not. While discrimination often concerns members of social groups that are marginalized in their numerical proportion; women make up the slight majority in most countries. Still, in decision-making positions, they form part of a minority. Women may hence be the single largest—internally very heterogeneous—marginalized group within both the global and the managerial workforce. So by sheer numerical relevance, gender discrimination is a prime object of study concerning socio-demographic disadvantage within organizations. For Europe, issues of race and ethnicity arise to a greater degree from relatively recent migration in comparison to the United States. From this perspective, women as an overall group present themselves as a social group directly mirroring the educational biography of their male peers to a greater degree than migrants and descendants of migrants can. Still, forms and patterns of discrimination are intertwined rather than mutually exclusive organizational phenomena. Organizations that face gender disadvantage often simultaneously struggle with racial or ethnic discrimination. Some aspects of this study on gender discrimination must thus be considered relevant also for other forms of social discrimination; others will remain unique to the situation of women compared with men.

Keywords

Human Capital Gender Discrimination Human Capital Investment Female Director Corporate Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Davidson MJ, Burke RJ (2000) Women in management: current research issues volume II. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Dijkstra AG (1997) Gender and economics: a European perspective. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Schubert R (1993) Ökonomische Diskriminierung von Frauen—Eine volkswirtschaftliche Verschwendung. Fischer Taschenbuch, Frankfurt amGoogle Scholar
  4. Voß H-J (2011) Making sex revisited: Dekonstruktion des Geschlechts aus biologisch-medizinischer Perspektive. TranscriptGoogle Scholar
  5. Aigner DJ, Cain GG (1977) Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets. Ind Labor Relat Rev 30(2):175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antal AB, Krebsbacher-Gnath C (1993) Women in management in Germany: east, west, and reunited. Int Stud Manage Organ 23(2):49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barinaga M (1992) Profile of a field: neuroscience the pipeline is leaking. Science 13:1366–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron JN, Bielby WT (1986) Men and women at work: sex segregation and statistical discrimination. Am J Soc 91(4):759–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilimoria D (1997) A qualitative comparison of the boardroom experiences of U.S. and Norwegian women corporate directors. Int Rev Women Leadersh 3(2):63–76Google Scholar
  10. Bilimoria D, Piderit SK (1994) Board committee membership: effects of sex-based bias. Acad Manage J 37(6):1453–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brammer S, Millington A, Pavelin S (2007) Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Cor Gov 15(2):393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke RJ (1994) Women on corporate boards of directors: views of Canadian chief executive officers. Women Manage Rev 9(5):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cames I, Vinnicombe S, Singh V (2001) Profiles of “successful managers” held by male and female banking managers across Europe. Women Manage Rev 16(3):108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cattaneo RJ, Reavley M, Andrew T (1994) Women in management as a strategic HR initiative. Women Manage Rev 9(2):23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper JJ (2001) Women middle managers’ perception of the glass ceiling. Women Manage Rev 16(1):30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Correll SJ (2001) Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments. Am J Sociol 106(6):1691–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cross C (2006) Barriers to advancing female careers in the high-tech sector: empirical evidence from Ireland. Women Manage Rev 21(1):28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison L (2001) Senior management in chartered surveying: where are the women? Women Manage Rev 15(5/6):264–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farrell KA, Hersch PL (2005) Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. J Cor Financ 11:85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Figart DM, Mutari E (2005) Rereading becker: contextualizing the development of discrimination theory. J Econ Issues 39(2):475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forster N (2000) A case study of women academics’ views on equal opportunities, career prospects and work-family conflicts in a British university. Women Manage Rev 15(7):316–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gale AW (1994) Women in non-traditional occupations: the construction industry. Women Manage Rev 9(2):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haessel W, Palmer J (1978) Market power and employment discrimination. J Hum Resour 13(4):545–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall-Taylor B (1997) The construction of women’s management skills and the marginalization of women in senior management. Women Manage Rev 12(7):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heilman ME (1997) Sex discrimination and the affirmative action remedy: the role of sex stereotypes. J Bus Ethics 16:877–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hellerstein JK, Neumark D, Troske KR (2002) Market forces and sex discrimination. J Hum Resour 37(2):353–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holmlund H, Sund K (2008) Is the gender gap in school performance affected by the sex of the teacher. Labour Econ 15:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hymowitz C, Schellhardt TD (1986) The glass ceiling. The Wall Street Journal. Special Report on the Corporate WomanGoogle Scholar
  29. Irvine WB (2000) Beyond sexual harassment. J Bus Ethics 28:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansson U (1998) The transformation of gendered work: dualistic stereotypes and paradoxical reality. Gend Work Organ 5(1):43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korac-Kakabadse N (2001) Editorial: from glass ceilings to global nomads: what difference to equity and access for women. Women Manag Rev 16(3):104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laufer J, Fielden SL (2002) Editorial: gendered organizational lives. Women Manage Rev 17(3/4):101–103Google Scholar
  33. Leblanc G (1995) Discrimination in the labour market. Can J Econ 28(3):702–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levitt SD (2004) Testing theories of discrimination: evidence from weakest link. J Law Econ XLVII:421–452Google Scholar
  35. Mavin S (2001) Women’s career in theory and practice: time for change? Women Manage Rev 16(4):183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metcalfe B, Dick G (2007) Is the force still with her? Gender and commitment in the police. Women Manage Rev 17(7/8):392–403Google Scholar
  37. Michie S, Nelson DL (2006) Barriers women face in information technology careers: self-efficacy, passion and gender biases. Women Manage Rev 21(1):10–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oakley JG (2000) Gender-based barriers to senior management positions: understanding the scarcity of female CEOs. J Bus Ethics 76:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Olson P (1990) The persistence of occupational segregation: a critique of its theoretical underpinning. J Econ Issues 24(1):161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paulson Gjerde KA (2002) The existence of gender-specific promotion standards in the U.S. Manag Decis Econ 23(8):447–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perry EL, Davis-Blake A, Kulik CT (1994) Explaining gender-based selection decisions: a synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Acad Manage Rev 19(4):786–820Google Scholar
  42. Peterson H (2007) Gendered work ideals in Swedish it firms: valued and not valued workers. Gend Work Organ 14(4):333–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Phelps E (1972) The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Am Econ Rev 62:659–661Google Scholar
  44. Schein VE (2001) A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. J Soc Issues 57:675–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh V, Vinnicombe S (2003) The 2002 female FTSE index and women directors. Women Manage Rev 18(7):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Szwajkowski E, Larwood L (1991) Rational decision processes and sex discrimination: testing “rational” bias theory. J Organ Behav 12(6):507–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terjesen S, Sealy R, Singh V (2009) Women directors on corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Cor Gov 17(3):320–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thanacoody PR, Bartram T, Barker M, Jacobs K (2006) Career progression among female academics: a comparative study of Australia and Mauritius. Women Manage Rev 21(7):536–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wentling RM (2003) The career development and aspirations of women in middle management—Revisited. Women Manage Rev 18(5/6):311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White B (1995) The career development of successful women. Women Manage Rev 10(3):4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson F (2005) Caught between difference and similarity: the case of women academics. Women Manage Rev 20(3/4):234–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wood GJ (2006) Career advancement in Australian middle managers: a follow-up study. Women Manage Rev 21(4):277–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zellner H (1972) Discrimination against women, occupational segregation, and the relative wage. Am Econ Rev 62(1/2):157–160Google Scholar
  54. Catalyst (1997a) 1997 catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the fortune 500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/178/1997-catalyst-census-of-women-corporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fortune-500
  55. Catalyst (1997b) 1997 catalyst census of women board directors of the fortune 500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/169/1997-catalyst-census-of-women-board-directors-of-the-fortune-500
  56. Catalyst (2002) 2002 Catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the fortune 500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/174/2002-catalyst-census-of-women-corporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fortune-500
  57. Catalyst (2003a) Women in US corporate leadership: 2003. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/93/women-in-us-corporate-leadership-2003
  58. Catalyst (2003b) 2003 Catalyst census of women board directors of the fortune 500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/148/2003-catalyst-census-of-women-board-directors-of-the-fortune-500
  59. Catalyst (2009a) 2008 catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the FP500. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/295/2008-catalyst-census-of-women-corporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fp500
  60. Catalyst (2009f) Women CEOs of the fortune 1000. http://www.catalyst.org/publication/322/women-ceos-of-the-fortune-1000
  61. Catalyst (2015b) Pyramid: women in S&P 500 companies. http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-sp-500-companies
  62. Donohue J. Is title VII efficient? U Pa L Rev 134(1986):1411. Available at http://works.bepress.com/john_donohue/48
  63. Europäische Kommission (2008b) Generaldirektion Beschäftigung, Soziales und Chancengleichheit, Frauen und Männer in Entscheidungspositionen 2007—Situations- und Trendanalyse. http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/publications/2008/ke8108186_de.pdf
  64. EuropeanPWN (European Professional Women’s Network), Press Release (2008) Third bi-annual EuropeanPWN BoardWomen Monitor 2008. www.europeanpwn.net/files/3rd_bwm_2008_press_release_1.pdf
  65. EuropeanPWN (European Professional Women’s Network), Press Release (2010) Fourth bi-annual EuropeanPWN BoardWomen Monitor 2010. http://www.pwnamsterdam.net/articles/epwn_board_monitor_2010
  66. Higgs D (2003) Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. http://www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_execs_review
  67. Butler J, Trouble G (1990) Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge Chapman & Hall Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Keinert-Kisin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations